A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Size does matter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 11th 04, 03:27 PM
HECTOP
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Size does matter

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/573107/M/

HECTOP
PP-ASEL-IA
http://www.maxho.com
maxho_at_maxho.com


  #2  
Old May 11th 04, 05:32 PM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 11 May 2004 10:27:36 -0400, HECTOP wrote:

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/573107/M/

HECTOP
PP-ASEL-IA
http://www.maxho.com
maxho_at_maxho.com


Why does it look like that plane was "photoshopped" in?



  #3  
Old May 11th 04, 05:36 PM
Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is no shadow.


Why does it look like that plane was "photoshopped" in?



  #4  
Old May 11th 04, 05:48 PM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 11 May 2004 16:36:31 +0000, Al wrote:

There is no shadow.


Why does it look like that plane was "photoshopped" in?


Ya, it was a rhetorical question. Aside from the fact that there is no
shadow, the other objects in the photo have fairly soft edges whereas the
plane has a harsh anti-aliased outline. To me, it jumps out as being fake
before you even notice the lack of shadow. In otherwords, the "crispness"
of the phane does not match that of other objects at the same distance.
There is also no motion blurr on the plane even though it obvious on the
cars.

Cheers!


  #5  
Old May 11th 04, 05:57 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Greg Copeland ) wrote:

Aside from the fact that there is no shadow,


Look again. There is a shadow, just at the crest of the road.

--
Peter










  #6  
Old May 11th 04, 06:28 PM
Greg Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 11 May 2004 12:57:13 -0400, Peter R. wrote:

Greg Copeland ) wrote:

Aside from the fact that there is no shadow,


Look again. There is a shadow, just at the crest of the road.


If that's the shadow to the plane, the angle doesn't appear to match any
others. All the other shadows would appear to place the sun directly
overhead. Which means, if what you're calling a shadow is supposed to be
coming from the plane, it was put in badly. Otherwise, we'd have to
simply call it an unidentified dark area in the picture. Furthermore,
look at where the shadow is cast under the wing.





  #7  
Old May 11th 04, 07:34 PM
Dima Volodin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Greg Copeland" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 11 May 2004 16:36:31 +0000, Al wrote:

There is no shadow.


Why does it look like that plane was "photoshopped" in?


Ya, it was a rhetorical question. Aside from the fact that there is no
shadow, the other objects in the photo have fairly soft edges whereas the
plane has a harsh anti-aliased outline. To me, it jumps out as being fake
before you even notice the lack of shadow. In otherwords, the "crispness"
of the phane does not match that of other objects at the same distance.
There is also no motion blurr on the plane even though it obvious on the
cars.


The shadows are there, and you don't get a motion blur on a target if you follow
it with your camera. An-124s are known to fly into BWI, and the picture seems
pretty consistent with the information the author provided. From what I can tell
(of course, to err is human), the picture was taken at Dorsey Rd, Glen Burnie,
MD (McPherson, Friendship Park), the Ruslan is landing 33L in the afternoon. The
METAR data for that time fit what you see on the picture pretty good. And if the
picture looks suspicious to you, you can always ask the author, the contact link
is right there next to the picture.

Cheers!


Dima

  #8  
Old May 12th 04, 08:07 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dima Volodin" wrote in message news:M39oc.30039$iy5.19659@okepread05...

The shadows are there, and you don't get a motion blur on a target if you follow
it with your camera.


If you pan the camera to eliminate blur for a moving object, then you expect to see blur
on stationary objects.

  #9  
Old May 11th 04, 09:51 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Greg Copeland" wrote in message

In otherwords, the "crispness"
of the phane does not match that of other objects at the same distance.
There is also no motion blurr on the plane even though it obvious on the
cars.


Could it be because the photographer was tracking the plane? I noticed
there's a guy looking at what appears to be the plane in the lower right
corner, meaning somebody is looking at -something-. There is a noticeable
lack of brakelights and skidmarks from the cars to suggest that the driver
was distracted (or a pilot, and geeking completely out) by the airplane.

An airplane like that used to land at Moffett (it's an AN-134, I believe).
Spent several hours watching semis drive in through the tail and exit
through the nose. The plane is that big.


  #10  
Old May 11th 04, 05:49 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Al wrote:

There is no shadow.


Yes, there is. The fuselage shadow runs along the top of the crest of the road.
Shadows of the wings and tail extend into the green field behind the plane. From the
angle of the wing shadow on the side of the fuselage, the ground shadows are where
one would expect them to be.

George Patterson
If you don't tell lies, you never have to remember what you said.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stop The Noise petitions FAA to increase N number size Earl Grieda Piloting 19 April 26th 04 04:46 AM
Former Air Force official pleads guilty to conspiracy in Boeing matter Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 April 21st 04 12:16 AM
Puget Sound TFRs reduced in size - charted here David H Owning 3 January 10th 04 06:01 AM
Puget Sound TFRs reduced in size, turned into National Security Areas C J Campbell Piloting 4 January 10th 04 06:01 AM
Trike wing bolt size Aaron Smith Home Built 0 September 30th 03 03:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.