A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Translate WX Forecast



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16  
Old July 31st 05, 02:22 AM
nooneimportant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
news


"Jonathan Goodish" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Matt Barrow" wrote:
I can't stand wading through an undecoded briefing where I have to

pick
through "Wind" and "Temperature" and all of that unnecessary verbal
nonsense in order to get the information.

Wind and Temp data is nonsense?


The data is not, the excess verbiage of "Wind" and "Temperature" is.



Sounds rather like the "If you can't run a computer from the command

line,
you shouldn't be on it!" crowd. That was a popular refrain from the
Unix
gang. I wonder how many of those are on the outs right now, with the IT
industry going south? "Requirements? We don't do requirements; you'll

get it
the way we want to do it".


Not really. The bottom line is that decoded METARs/TAFs provide a lot
of information in a small package, and it can be read very quickly.
Plain language briefings are cumbersome by comparison. I know of at
least one briefing provider that has an option for undecoded, and that
is CSC DUATs.

The reality is that encoded weather may be old, but there's nothing
wrong with it, and there are quite a few advantages to it. You do have
to learn how to read it, though.


Amazing that people want to save one or two lines that provide clarity,
but
then spend eons writing out long, rambling posts in here! :~)




The truth is that We like our old fashioned metars and tafs... yes i do
think they could be a little more clear, but do find it easier to quickly
read over one or two lines, then to parse through a longer undecoded format.
I can look at a TAF and spot trends very quickly, or look at multiple metars
on a page and instantly pick out temps, winds etc without having to look for
specific words. If you dont' like it, get your imformation from ADDS, DUATS
or any number of other sources that give the option of "Plain Language"
data. Now i do think plain language formats would be ideal for NOTAMS and
such, but leave TAFs and METARs alone, especially considering all you have
to do is call up your local FSS briefer, and he will decode and read the
damn thing to you anyway if you want.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hobbs Soaring Forecast Mike the Strike Soaring 0 June 4th 05 06:51 PM
Have you ever... Jay Honeck Piloting 229 May 6th 05 08:26 PM
RUC Mixed Boundary forecast m pautz Soaring 2 March 26th 05 02:48 AM
Weather Question: forecasting clouds Jonathan Piloting 11 November 19th 04 08:34 PM
A good 12 hour soaring forecast goes bad Jonathan Gere Soaring 5 July 11th 04 01:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.