If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message news "Jonathan Goodish" wrote in message ... In article , "Matt Barrow" wrote: I can't stand wading through an undecoded briefing where I have to pick through "Wind" and "Temperature" and all of that unnecessary verbal nonsense in order to get the information. Wind and Temp data is nonsense? The data is not, the excess verbiage of "Wind" and "Temperature" is. Sounds rather like the "If you can't run a computer from the command line, you shouldn't be on it!" crowd. That was a popular refrain from the Unix gang. I wonder how many of those are on the outs right now, with the IT industry going south? "Requirements? We don't do requirements; you'll get it the way we want to do it". Not really. The bottom line is that decoded METARs/TAFs provide a lot of information in a small package, and it can be read very quickly. Plain language briefings are cumbersome by comparison. I know of at least one briefing provider that has an option for undecoded, and that is CSC DUATs. The reality is that encoded weather may be old, but there's nothing wrong with it, and there are quite a few advantages to it. You do have to learn how to read it, though. Amazing that people want to save one or two lines that provide clarity, but then spend eons writing out long, rambling posts in here! :~) The truth is that We like our old fashioned metars and tafs... yes i do think they could be a little more clear, but do find it easier to quickly read over one or two lines, then to parse through a longer undecoded format. I can look at a TAF and spot trends very quickly, or look at multiple metars on a page and instantly pick out temps, winds etc without having to look for specific words. If you dont' like it, get your imformation from ADDS, DUATS or any number of other sources that give the option of "Plain Language" data. Now i do think plain language formats would be ideal for NOTAMS and such, but leave TAFs and METARs alone, especially considering all you have to do is call up your local FSS briefer, and he will decode and read the damn thing to you anyway if you want. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hobbs Soaring Forecast | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 0 | June 4th 05 06:51 PM |
Have you ever... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 229 | May 6th 05 08:26 PM |
RUC Mixed Boundary forecast | m pautz | Soaring | 2 | March 26th 05 02:48 AM |
Weather Question: forecasting clouds | Jonathan | Piloting | 11 | November 19th 04 08:34 PM |
A good 12 hour soaring forecast goes bad | Jonathan Gere | Soaring | 5 | July 11th 04 01:21 AM |