If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Doug "Woody" and Erin Beal" wrote "Grantland" wrote: (Harry Andreas) wrote: Joe Osman wrote: snip While doing CAS from afar doesn't have the dramatic flair of the good ol' days, it certainly is just as effective. Won't make very good footage for some future war movie though. That's all well and good if the technology works, but if it fails the results can be a lot nastier than when the ordnance was being pointed in the proper direction until the last second with the pilot there to make the decision to release or not. And if the enemy defeats or spoofs the terchnology we should still have the old fashioned capability around, especially in an expeditionary context where troops on the ground need "flying artillery". The technology is a lot harder to defeat than most people realize. The alternative is to spend a LOT of time training for dumb bomb deliveries that you'll probably never do: a waste to resources when you could be training for something more useful. Or not train for dumb bomb deliveries enough, and if you have to do it, not be competent enough which is a risk all it's own. I think you need to bet on the odds, which are strongly in favor of the technology, especially since it's been demonstrated in service. until someone detonates an EMP nukes(s) in high orbit. No doubt there's a coupla candidates already up there, waiting. There goes your $trillion+ investment.. tsk tsk Right because terrorists can drive U-Haul trucks into space. Since GPS Sats are thoroughly radiation hardened, it don't matter much. It's impossible to take out GPS service with a single weapon of any kind, any where. You_might_degrade system accuracy some places, some times but that's about it. The Air Force is active in increasing the hardness of the GPS system through increased coding gain, radiated power and AJ antennas for the weapons. I don't see much payoff and do see a lot of costs is maintaining the ability to deliver CAS fires with dumb munitions. Better to proliferate the ways of guiding smart munitions (mm-wave seekers for instance). The most fruitful avenue to interfering with the New Age CAS is in network communications attacks to slow down, corrupt or block those automated 9-line messages. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 30th 05 04:51 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 01:51 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |