If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
buying help
Hello,
I in the market for a six seater. Could somone please help me out with a cost analysis of a single engine 6 seater vs a twin. I would like something on the faster end of the group. Some of the models I've looked at are chugging along at 150kts or so. I'm looking for something closer to 190kts if possible. Thanks, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
John Doe wrote:
Hello, I in the market for a six seater. Could somone please help me out with a cost analysis of a single engine 6 seater vs a twin. I would like something on the faster end of the group. Some of the models I've looked at are chugging along at 150kts or so. I'm looking for something closer to 190kts if possible. Plane & Pilot just did a review on the Saratoga. Full fuel gave +500 pounds useful. If I remember right that included the deicing system. What a waste of money on a 6 seat, 180 knot plane... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
If you want to burn the fuel, an Aztec will true 180 knots. Figure a cost
of about $200 per hour, or 3 times the fuel burn times the fuel price. Our current price is $2.96, so 25gph x 3 x $2.96 = $222. We've found that to be about 10% high, so far. Jim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
might be 500# useful.. but to fill the seats of a "Lance".. watch the aft CG
BT "Darrel Toepfer" wrote in message ... John Doe wrote: Hello, I in the market for a six seater. Could somone please help me out with a cost analysis of a single engine 6 seater vs a twin. I would like something on the faster end of the group. Some of the models I've looked at are chugging along at 150kts or so. I'm looking for something closer to 190kts if possible. Plane & Pilot just did a review on the Saratoga. Full fuel gave +500 pounds useful. If I remember right that included the deicing system. What a waste of money on a 6 seat, 180 knot plane... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
BTIZ wrote:
might be 500# useful.. but to fill the seats of a "Lance".. watch the aft CG Well the Saratoga has an upfront luggage compartment to assist with that... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Darrel Toepfer wrote:
Plane & Pilot just did a review on the Saratoga. Full fuel gave +500 pounds useful. If I remember right that included the deicing system. What a waste of money on a 6 seat, 180 knot plane... What's the useful load with 3.5 hours' fuel in the tanks? George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
George Patterson wrote:
Darrel Toepfer wrote: Plane & Pilot just did a review on the Saratoga. Full fuel gave +500 pounds useful. If I remember right that included the deicing system. What a waste of money on a 6 seat, 180 knot plane... What's the useful load with 3.5 hours' fuel in the tanks? I quoted wrong, full tanks yields 411 pounds useful inside the cabin, 537 lbs total (front baggage? 100# max)... Full tanks is 102 gallons. TKS deice fluid weighs 9.2 lbs. per gallon and carries 4.4 gallons. 75% power consumption is 16.1 gph @ 175 knots @ 10k ft... 3600# gross, empty weight is 2466#, useful load 1149#. Max ramp weight is 3615#.. So something around 3 people and not much... The author mentions a ferry flight to down under at 25% over gross, 4500# total weight... 650 fpm climb out... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
so doesn't the Lance, and Cherokee 6... all precursors to the Saratoga
BT "Darrel Toepfer" wrote in message ... BTIZ wrote: might be 500# useful.. but to fill the seats of a "Lance".. watch the aft CG Well the Saratoga has an upfront luggage compartment to assist with that... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Darrel Toepfer wrote: BTIZ wrote: might be 500# useful.. but to fill the seats of a "Lance".. watch the aft CG Well the Saratoga has an upfront luggage compartment to assist with that.. So ... all you need is 6 people that weigh 75 lbs each . And each carrying one small 5 pound suitcase with them. .. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Darrel Toepfer wrote:
I quoted wrong, full tanks yields 411 pounds useful inside the cabin, 537 lbs total (front baggage? 100# max)... So. Using the figures you provided, you can put 60 gallons in the tanks and do 3 hour legs with nearly 45 minutes reserve and carry 663 pounds in the cabin (789 max). That's a little better, but not much. Leave the de-ice tanks empty, and you get another 40 pounds. That finally gets you up to 4 FAA adults. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fun weekend buying an Arrow (long) | Jack Allison | Owning | 44 | April 20th 05 12:29 PM |
Tips on buying a cessna 182 | Matteucci | Aviation Marketplace | 4 | September 15th 04 08:42 AM |
Advice on buying a 152? | rajek | Owning | 27 | June 21st 04 08:09 PM |
Information on buying an aircraft | Marco L | Piloting | 6 | August 20th 03 08:58 AM |
Buying my first plane | Gilles Leblanc | Piloting | 7 | July 29th 03 05:21 AM |