Dan Rather apologizes

Tje only people who are doing that is your side
"Leslie Swartz" wrote in message
...
They are now . . .

And if they weren't ****ed off at kerry before (for the other reasons),
they
should be for this one.

Steve Swartz

"Leadfoot" wrote in message
news:_us4d.333336$Oi.255112@fed1read04...
So every one who got a medal in vietnam is under a cloud right?

A year from now, no one will even remember Kerry...



"Leadfoot" wrote
Tje only people who are doing that is your side
"Leslie Swartz" wrote
They are now . . .

And if they weren't ****ed off at kerry before (for the other reasons),
they
should be for this one.

Steve Swartz

"Leadfoot" wrote
So every one who got a medal in vietnam is under a cloud right?

"Leadfoot" wrote in message
news:LGF4d.333599$Oi.40866@fed1read04...

Find me a vote where it was his vote that was critical.


Irrelevant.


In other words you can't do it.


No, it's that it's irrelevant. A vote against is a vote against whether or
not it's a deciding vote.



Invading Iraq not only needlessly but diverting assets away from
are real enemy al-queda.


There was no needless invasion of Iraq, the war on terror was
never limited to al Queda.


No wmd and no constructive links to al-queda. For that matter they can't
even show any terror attack was planned by Iraq agasinst the US.


At the time of the invasion every nation with intelligence capability agreed
that Iraq had WMD. Even those that opposed the invasion. Had there been no
invasion the world would still believe Iraq had WMD.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Leadfoot" wrote in message
news:LGF4d.333599$Oi.40866@fed1read04...

Find me a vote where it was his vote that was critical.


Irrelevant.


In other words you can't do it.


No, it's that it's irrelevant. A vote against is a vote against whether
or
not it's a deciding vote.

You can't find even one can you?




Invading Iraq not only needlessly but diverting assets away from
are real enemy al-queda.


There was no needless invasion of Iraq, the war on terror was
never limited to al Queda.


No wmd and no constructive links to al-queda. For that matter they
can't
even show any terror attack was planned by Iraq agasinst the US.


At the time of the invasion every nation with intelligence capability
agreed
that Iraq had WMD. Even those that opposed the invasion. Had there been
no
invasion the world would still believe Iraq had WMD.

Yeah but he didn't. Turns out a lot of people beleived Chalabi's nephew.
They either didn't know or didn't care the source had a little bit more bias
than say CBS news

"Leadfoot" wrote in message
news:3Wk5d.335188$Oi.62956@fed1read04...

You can't find even one can you?


I don't know, I didn't look for any. There's no point in looking for
something that's irrelevant.



Yeah but he didn't.


Right. The Kurds gassed themselves.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
. net...

"Leadfoot" wrote in message
news:3Wk5d.335188$Oi.62956@fed1read04...

You can't find even one can you?


I don't know, I didn't look for any. There's no point in looking for
something that's irrelevant.

No point if there aren't any.




Yeah but he didn't.


Right. The Kurds gassed themselves.

What year was that?

"Leadfoot" wrote

At the time of the invasion every nation with intelligence capability
agreed
that Iraq had WMD. Even those that opposed the invasion. Had there
been
no
invasion the world would still believe Iraq had WMD.

Yeah but he didn't. Turns out a lot of people beleived Chalabi's nephew.
They either didn't know or didn't care the source had a little bit more
bias
than say CBS news

What day between 17 Mar, 1988 (documented use of WMD) and today, did the
statement "Saddam had no WMD's" become true?

When was that?

Specifically....what day could be celebrated as "No WMD Day"?

Pete
"You've got to be very, very careful, general. We have spoken with Saddam
Hussein. He is a madman. He has weapons of mass destruction, biological
weapons. And he will use them against your troops."
Hosni Mubarak talking to Gen. Tommy Franks

"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real
...."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 04:34:15 GMT, "Pete"
wrote:

"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real
..."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

I'd love to have a cite for that quote. (Assuming I can't get it
simply by pasting it into Google, which I will now try.)

Thanks!

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org

"Cub Driver" wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 04:34:15 GMT, "Pete"
wrote:

"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents
a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is
real
..."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

I'd love to have a cite for that quote. (Assuming I can't get it
simply by pasting it into Google, which I will now try.)

It is from a speech he gave on that date at Georgetown University, try this
site for the full text:

http://www.seanrobins.com/national/k...statements.htm

"Pete" wrote in message
...

"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a
brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is
real
..."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.


Kerry lied about WMD!