If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Bell wrote:
But you cannot prove a causal relationship; unless, the problem is peculiar to the USA. My primary and secondary education was the result of unionised teachers, and it was reasonably useful. The decline in education in Ontario (and the rest of Canada, near as I can tell) is attributable political interference to ignore reality [general students feel bad, so eliminate the general level courses and dumb down the 'advanced' courses so the general level student can pass]. I consider myself lucky to live in a country where no one has successfully sued a professor over an esteem-busting low grade. To carry this tirade outside of the topic, I am infuriated that people want equality between two things that cannot be equal. No legislation will make below average students perform as well as above average students and people need the threat of failure to push them to excel [why work at it if they will pass me, anyways]. I had an adequate schooling in an Ontario collegiate institute's advanced programme in the early '70s. Although I did not graduate from Grade 13, I had a Junior Matric, and that was good enough to qualify for the Officer Classification Training Plan after some time in the ranks. I did not have much contact with the school system again until my niece and nephew were in high school -- I was appalled; they could not parse, they couldn't apply rudimentary logic to criticize written work (their maths were good, but I think that was mainly genetic and from trying to beat their dad at cards and backgammon). I only re-entered the school system as a mature student in 1995 following the CF's major reductions in combat arms officers. There was no slack cut, I am happy to say, but there was a real difference between students who qualified for honours programmes and those who did not. Frankly, the difference seemed to be those who had an idea of scholarship and academe, and those who did not. Sad to say, the divide seem to cleave along socio-economic strata, but I suspect largely because those whose parents were grads knew where there kids could find help when they needed it and steered them there. -- Andrew Chaplin SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO (If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Lothian wrote in message ...
In article , Michael Petukhov wrote: Yeah i know. Howeverr may be I am interested in people's of these particular NGs opinions. Why not? Moreover outrageously off-topics here are so often. So you are part of the problem, and nothing to do with the solution. Depends on what problem you are talking about. Moreover there are problems with mathematical prove of no solution at all. What's the Russian for troll? You mean russian word for troll? There are many actually. I mean for each english word we have some 5-10 different synonyms to be used in a different context, situation or persons to whom you speak. While I am an admirer of the great Russian language, I do not believe that it has between 3 and 6 million lexical items. Come on! At very best modern English (partucularly its US version) is reduced to 3-4 thousands. Maximum! Oh.. I forgot the main point... I did not understood would you agree with the author of that article or not? None of your bloody business, not here, anyway. Don't you think "not here, anyway" sounds a bit ambiguous...? *plonk* I apologize to all others for making a further contribution to this outrageously off-topic thread here (smn) and in ram, with which smn generally enjoys friendly relations. The rest is silence. No problem. There will be many others much less cowardly. Michael |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
A film and literature prof? What the hell do you expect from a FILM AND
LITERATURE PROF? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
1. So what. In an open society, it is easy to find examples of all
the wrong things. It's also easy, in America, to find out _about_ those wrong things, a little nuance our Canadian tut-tutter seems to miss (although Canadians don't seem to have a strong grasp of many things American in the first place). As compared to the Soviet Union, or China, or Japan, or even many topics in Europe where it's difficult if not impossible to find out about these things on your own regardless. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "t_mark"
wrote: 1. So what. In an open society, it is easy to find examples of all the wrong things. It's also easy, in America, to find out _about_ those wrong things, a little nuance our Canadian tut-tutter seems to miss (although Canadians don't seem to have a strong grasp of many things American in the first place). As compared to the Soviet Union, or China, or Japan, or even many topics in Europe where it's difficult if not impossible to find out about these things on your own regardless. I'm not a Canadian-American (or American-Canadian) like AHS, but I've worked extensively for Canadian companies and had time to learn some of the cultural differences. Indeed, I make many of my Canadian friends nervous when I tell Canadian political/ethnic/cultural jokes. There's a vague flavor of the Japanese concept of the "strange gaijin" who knows too much about the culture, eh? The problem is that Canada and the USA have so many superficial (and also deep) similarities that it can be hard to pick up the differences. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Howard Berkowitz wrote in message ...
In article , "t_mark" wrote: 1. So what. In an open society, it is easy to find examples of all the wrong things. It's also easy, in America, to find out _about_ those wrong things, a little nuance our Canadian tut-tutter seems to miss (although Canadians don't seem to have a strong grasp of many things American in the first place). As compared to the Soviet Union, or China, or Japan, or even many topics in Europe where it's difficult if not impossible to find out about these things on your own regardless. I'm not a Canadian-American (or American-Canadian) like AHS, but I've worked extensively for Canadian companies and had time to learn some of the cultural differences. Indeed, I make many of my Canadian friends nervous when I tell Canadian political/ethnic/cultural jokes. There's a vague flavor of the Japanese concept of the "strange gaijin" who knows too much about the culture, eh? Concept of gaijin is not those who knows too much about the culture. I live and work there for three years and as far as I understand this word is considered to be a bad word, is not used publicly, at least not before foreigners. The meaning of gaijin is a foreigner who do not undertsand rules of proper japanese style life and behaivior. Since both are quite complex particularly for beginners, almost all foreigners in Japan are a sort of gaijins. I am not sure what is the fraction of ordinary japanese share this views on foreigners but must be not so small fraction. Michael The problem is that Canada and the USA have so many superficial (and also deep) similarities that it can be hard to pick up the differences. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ ihuvpe | Chris | Instrument Flight Rules | 43 | December 19th 04 09:40 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ unakm | Karl Treier | Aviation Marketplace | 3 | December 17th 04 11:37 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ | John | Home Built | 4 | November 10th 04 01:45 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ihuvpe | john smith | Home Built | 2 | November 9th 04 03:50 AM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ihuvpe | john smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | November 9th 04 03:50 AM |