A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION IN STRIKEWARFARE.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 3rd 08, 09:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.military, rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Mike[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 111
Default COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION IN STRIKEWARFARE.

COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION IN STRIKE
WARFARE.
RAND.
http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2007/RAND_MG655.pdf
  #2  
Old January 4th 08, 03:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.military, rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Mr.Smartypants[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION INSTRIKE WARFARE.

On Jan 3, 2:32*pm, Mike wrote:
COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION IN STRIKE
WARFARE.
RAND.http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2007/RAND_MG655.pdf




Lots more friendly fire missions coming up!

YEEE-HAAAWWW!!!

  #3  
Old January 4th 08, 07:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.military, rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
g lof2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION INSTRIKE WARFARE.

On Jan 4, 7:45*am, "Mr.Smartypants" wrote:
On Jan 3, 2:32*pm, Mike wrote:

COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION IN STRIKE
WARFARE.
RAND.http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2007/RAND_MG655.pdf


Lots more friendly fire missions coming up!

YEEE-HAAAWWW!!!


There would not have to be any more if you just stand still a minute.
  #4  
Old January 4th 08, 09:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
SiG226[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION IN STRIKE WARFARE.


"Mr.Smartypants" wrote in message
...
On Jan 3, 2:32 pm, Mike wrote:
COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION IN STRIKE
WARFARE.
RAND.http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2007/RAND_MG655.pdf




Lots more friendly fire missions coming up!

YEEE-HAAAWWW!!!

hmm.....sounds like a donkey..........nope my mistake its an ass!


  #5  
Old January 4th 08, 09:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Steve Hix
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 340
Default COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION IN STRIKE WARFARE.

In article
,
g lof2 wrote:

On Jan 4, 7:45*am, "Mr.Smartypants" wrote:
On Jan 3, 2:32*pm, Mike wrote:

COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION IN STRIKE
WARFARE.
RAND.http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2007/RAND_MG655.pdf


Lots more friendly fire missions coming up!

YEEE-HAAAWWW!!!


There would not have to be any more if you just stand still a minute.


Aw, you just know he won't cooperate.
  #6  
Old January 6th 08, 08:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
fudog50[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION IN STRIKE WARFARE.

Hey smarty pants you are certainly embarrassing Canadiens as a whole
with your Libertairian spins, and I like Canadiens a lot....guess
what???

Everyone knows you are a loon and out in space.

Why are you consistently twisting facts? For what purpose?

Money?

Or is it just attention because you are lonely?

Give it a rest please, everyone just ignores your posts because they
are ludicrous.

I haven't been here for a few months which explains my fleeting
interest in your posts, but don't get excited, you won't hear from me
again, so relax.

Your posts are ALL BS and lies, and ignore the facts, which is a
typical libertarian ploy and is getting quite old and tiresome and
quite frankly, Does NOT work.

You need to try something else.


a On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:45:19 -0800 (PST), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:

On Jan 3, 2:32*pm, Mike wrote:
COMBAT PAIR: THE EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE-NAVY INTEGRATION IN STRIKE
WARFARE.
RAND.http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2007/RAND_MG655.pdf




Lots more friendly fire missions coming up!

YEEE-HAAAWWW!!!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Explain the Navy-Marine Corps Tactical Air Integration Plan to me. Henry J Cobb Naval Aviation 15 July 12th 06 09:21 PM
Air Force Working to Combat Stressors Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 18th 04 03:54 AM
Air Force ribbon will now show that wearer served in combat Stars and Stripes Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 May 7th 04 03:01 AM
Air Force combat search and rescue joins AFSOC team Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 30th 03 09:49 PM
Composite aircraft evolution David Megginson Owning 3 August 19th 03 05:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.