If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Geoffrey Barnes" wrote in message link.net...
I'm clear on how far away I have to stay from clouds during VFR flight Are you 300' away from that cloud or 400' away? What, you can't say? Then you shouldn't be flying VFR! That's why I decided to get an instrument rating. (j/k!) I'm guessing this counts as a "cloud", right? I mean, I couldn't see through it. That's my rule. If I can't see what's inside it, I don't try flying through it. Also applies well to mountains and birds. it. I reduced my speed a bit to keep my extended downwind from getting too close to the steel mill, and began to think of a plan that would keep the tower happy and me in legal VFR conditions. I was just about to ask to do a 360 in place when the Citation came over the numbers and the tower cleared me to turn base. On an 8-mile downwind you're practically in the enroute phase of flight. In Class D you're not even in the tower's airspace anymore. Widen out around, pinch in, or do the 360, whatever seems to make sense to you. If you know you;re the only one in the pattern just do it and give a courtesy call so the tower knows. If it's busy just give a shout and say, "waddaya want?" and they'll tell you. At that point, I asked to switch from touch-and-go to full stop, mostly because I didn't want to get caught facing that vapor cloud again. imagining a 50s-style scifi movie, "Attack of the Vapor Cloud!"/ There was nobody else in the pattern, and I don't think the tower controllers would have cared. But I didn't think of that at the time, and I wasn't convinced that I could stay legal if someone in authority decided that pillar of vapor coming from the steel plant constituted a "cloud". So I just landed and cut the flight short. How big was this pillar, 50', 200', 500' around, and you have miles of airspace with which to avoid it? Chill out (or just sublimate)! No one in the FAA sits around with radar scopes looking for VFR pilots who come within 400' of a cloud when the limit is 500'. Not by any means saying you can't get snagged in a technicality but my primary thought process is, "am I creating a risk by doing this." Example: few weekends ago I flew from BED to MVY under an broken cumulus ceiling that ranged between probably 2800' and 4000'. It was being produced by typical summer ground heating and ended abruptly at the shoreline. The forecast was unambiguous and expected no change until long after the flight. We cruised at altitudes between 3500' and 2500' the whole way pretty much. It was an otherwise gorgeous Saturday and we were cleared to land by Vineyard tower 5 miles out. Had the ceiling been 1000' higher we would have been sequenced at #5. I should mention the visibilities were 50 miles, and the tallest things between BED and MVY are one small patch of radio towers that are very easy to see and avoid. I also was under flight following the whole way, just so ATC knew where I was in case there was any IFR traffic that might want to come down through the clouds. To be sure, this is a flight I probably wouldn't have made on my own 50-100 hours ago (200TT now) but for this, what I could see was, that I had oodles of visibility, very static weather conditions (no chance of convective stuff either), and 1500-200' of legal altitude to work with. Under these circumstances is anybody going to care whether I was within 400' or 500' of the cloud above me? The ASOS at my home field is often off by 100s of feet from what I see out the window. You say to-may-to, I say to-mah-to. I felt comfortable that I had a million "outs" in case things got worse (airports everywhere within 5-10mi of my route the whole way) and I conducted the flight in such a way as not to endanger anyone else either. Maybe I'm being overconfident, or maybe I'm becoming more experienced. Sometimes it's hard to tell the difference. All I know is that it looked to me like a ton of guys missed a great day to fly. -cwk. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How high is that cloud? | Tim Hogard | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | November 29th 04 01:40 AM |
Revisiting lapse rates (From: How high is that cloud?) | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 26th 04 09:41 PM |
Cloud Separation... | Wily Wapiti | Piloting | 10 | August 14th 04 04:49 PM |
Winter Cloud Tops | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | January 9th 04 08:11 PM |
Logging x/c time and definition of landing | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 03 08:41 PM |