A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Products
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Collision avoidance equipment



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 11th 05, 10:57 AM
samcapt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Collision avoidance equipment

I have been reading about several low cost alternatives which provide
collision avoidance from Aviation Consumer. These devices seem to give
a rough estimate of range and the seperation altitude, but not
direction. Does anyone know of a portable system that give direction as
well?

  #2  
Old May 11th 05, 02:48 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

samcapt wrote:
I have been reading about several low cost alternatives which provide
collision avoidance from Aviation Consumer. These devices seem to give
a rough estimate of range and the seperation altitude, but not
direction. Does anyone know of a portable system that give direction as
well?

No, that would be rather difficult. These devices listen
omnidirectionally for other aircraft's Mode C returns. The
built in units use multiple directional antennas to do this
which would require a very large portable unit or precise
setting of the remote antennas neither of which was practical.

What might be possible is to sniff the TIS signal off a mode
S datalink (provided there is a mode S transponder somewhere
nearby), but I don't know enough about how that works.
  #3  
Old May 13th 05, 04:41 PM
jmk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The problem with a TIS "sniffer" is that it is designed to be a "login"
type thing. It could probably be done, but the information supplied is
specific to each aircraft request. And without knowing the location of
the requesting aircraft... I have much greater hope for TIS-B
(essentially the transistion plan from existing ATC radar to ADS-B.
But, of course, it's only available "elsewhere." Of course, TIS isn't
much better down where I fly... probably less than 1/10th of 1%
coverage.

It *is* possible to build an antenna (suite) that estimates direction
from differential time of arrival, coupled with relative signal
stength. We use something similar in some military applications, at
almost the same frequency as the xpndr. But it's not cheap, and the
bigger the antennas (and more spread out) the better. Distance would
still be a very crude estimate, of course, unless you make the array
active (interrogate like TCAS does) - and that is a big certification
issue as an intentional radiator.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Collision avoidance device Jim Hendrix Soaring 1 October 19th 04 09:24 AM
Airspeed of military planes Tetsuji Rai Piloting 100 April 24th 04 02:27 PM
Aviation Consumer and Collision Avoidance BHelman Products 52 April 23rd 04 05:35 AM
Flying when you know there is something wrong with the plane C J Campbell Piloting 26 January 14th 04 04:38 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.