|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
February 3rd 04, 06:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message news:VNRTb.7809 It is what the regs literally say. All they say is you have to be in instrument conditions. Doesn't say anything about flight rules. If you're in instrument conditions it's not legal VFR. Show me where it says that in the rules? My interpretation of the FAA's interpretation is that instrument conditions just means those that are necessitate operation by the instruments rather than requiring it to be less than the VFR minimums. 
|
|
#42
February 3rd 04, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message . .. Show me where it says that in the rules? Title 14--Aeronautics and Space CHAPTER I--FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PART 1--DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS § 1.1 General definitions. IFR conditions means weather conditions below the minimum for flight under visual flight rules. My interpretation of the FAA's interpretation is that instrument conditions just means those that are necessitate operation by the instruments rather than requiring it to be less than the VFR minimums. That interpretation is not consistent with the applicable regulations.
|
|
#43
February 3rd 04, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
ink.net: "Ron Natalie" wrote in message . .. Show me where it says that in the rules? Title 14--Aeronautics and Space CHAPTER I--FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PART 1--DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS § 1.1 General definitions. IFR conditions means weather conditions below the minimum for flight under visual flight rules. 'IFR conditions' and 'instrument conditions' are not necessarily the same thing. My interpretation of the FAA's interpretation is that instrument conditions just means those that are necessitate operation by the instruments rather than requiring it to be less than the VFR minimums. That interpretation is not consistent with the applicable regulations.
|
|
#44
February 3rd 04, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"gpsposter" wrote in message ... 'IFR conditions' and 'instrument conditions' are not necessarily the same thing. How do they differ?
|
|
#45
February 3rd 04, 07:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message . .. "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message news:VNRTb.7809 It is what the regs literally say. All they say is you have to be in instrument conditions. Doesn't say anything about flight rules. If you're in instrument conditions it's not legal VFR. Show me where it says that in the rules? My interpretation of the FAA's interpretation is that instrument conditions just means those that are necessitate operation by the instruments rather than requiring it to be less than the VFR minimums. Sort of like Ron's interpreation of CFR 14 Part 21 that claimed "a homebuilt is not an Experimental. 
|
|
#46
February 3rd 04, 09:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... "gpsposter" wrote in message ... 'IFR conditions' and 'instrument conditions' are not necessarily the same thing. How do they differ? As I said, there is no definition of instrument conditions in the rules. Hence the best we can come up with is the legal counsel. Your excessively pedantic nature can clearly see that they are different words.
|
|
#47
February 3rd 04, 09:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... Sort of like Ron's interpreation of CFR 14 Part 21 that claimed "a homebuilt is not an Experimental. I never said any such thing. Prove your allegations.
|
|
#48
February 3rd 04, 09:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message . .. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... Sort of like Ron's interpreation of CFR 14 Part 21 that claimed "a homebuilt is not an Experimental. I never said any such thing. Prove your allegations. You posted your ignorance to the "FAA form 337" thread at rec.aviation.homebuilt. Did you cancel you post, so you could lie now, Ron? Your track record for understanding CFR 14 is zero for three, over the past couple of weeks, Ron.
|
|
#49
February 4th 04, 12:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message . .. "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... Sort of like Ron's interpreation of CFR 14 Part 21 that claimed "a homebuilt is not an Experimental. I never said any such thing. Prove your allegations. You posted your ignorance to the "FAA form 337" thread at rec.aviation.homebuilt. Did you cancel you post, so you could lie now, Ron? Your track record for understanding CFR 14 is zero for three, over the past couple of weeks, Ron. Don't wrestle with a pig, Ron. The pig loves it, and all you will get is muddy.
|
|
#50
February 4th 04, 12:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Rich" wrote in message ... Don't wrestle with a pig, Ron. I think Ron cancelling his errant posts tells volumes. Saddam.net, eh? Bwahahahahahaha
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What approaches are in a database? | Ross | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | January 4th 04 07:57 PM |
| GPS approaches with Center | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 104 | October 22nd 03 09:42 PM |
| Logging instrument approaches | Slav Inger | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | July 27th 03 11:00 PM |
| Suppose We Really Do Have Only GPS Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 20th 03 05:10 PM |
| Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |
Linear Mode
