If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote:
Have been dealing with the "Kooks/Loons" that have been drifting through ADA swearing a "Bunch of Saudi's" could not have pulled off 9/11 because of ????? The same bunch also expound/argue differing "Red Herring Preposterous B/S Theories" as to why it could not have been "Hijacked Commercial A/C" involved in the 9/11 incidents. Which group do you frequent? Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type None of them Ralph...I did that till my fingertips developed calluses and my nerves started fraying then I discovered this neat little symbol shaped like a red circle with a slash through it marked 'ignore thread' (whatever that means!) and all those troublesome posts disappeared!...viola!... I dropped ada a couple years ago when ralfie mailbombed me with about 6 pictures of 'his' a/c...locked my email up for a week. -- -Gord. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message news "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message y.com... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message y.com... -Gord. Merry Christmas to you/yours Gord. Glad to see the "Sensible Old Hands" are still around/lurking ADA. Look here, Nesbitt, as long as you are calling 747s "bombs", you are a nut. Why does my wishing some 1 Merry Christmas cause you such "Heart Burn". No, Ralph, it is you attempting to include yourself in some "sensible old hands" group, that gives me alarm; as you are a nut calling 747s "bombs". Do you have any clue how humiliated Cal Tech is for that little stunt? I will not debate you over the fine points of Electrical Engineering, simply because I do not understand the "Fine Points" of same. You argue from a "Off the Cuff Perspective" without a true understanding of the hazards inherent in the "Basic Boeing CWT Design Philosophy" under specified circumstances. Your arguement that the 737 CWT wire bundles covered by advisory circular has anything to do with a "design philosophy" is delusional. A mistake with early 737 wire bundles does not translate into a 747 CWT problem. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though.. Duster |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Duster" wrote in message . .. Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better though.. Duster Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low heat. There have been several incidents world wide where Boeing A/C of various models have exploded sitting at gates, on ramps, taxing out, or shortly after take off after sitting with the air handling units running under ~ empty CWT's. There are now "Air Safety Directives" stipulating/requiring certain operating protocols to minimize this hazard associated with the "Boeing CWT Design Philosophy". Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.. . "Duster" wrote in message . .. Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better though.. Duster Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low heat. That, and Tarver being an engineer, reminds me of the old joke: an engineer is someone who thinks that, if your left leg is in a bucket of hot water and your right leg is in a bucket of ice, then on average, you're comfortable. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Could you point me to the thread? This sounds intersting...
Duster "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message .. . "Duster" wrote in message . .. Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better though.. Duster Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low heat. There have been several incidents world wide where Boeing A/C of various models have exploded sitting at gates, on ramps, taxing out, or shortly after take off after sitting with the air handling units running under ~ empty CWT's. There are now "Air Safety Directives" stipulating/requiring certain operating protocols to minimize this hazard associated with the "Boeing CWT Design Philosophy". Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote:
"Duster" wrote Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better though.. Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low heat. There have been several incidents world wide where Boeing A/C of various models have exploded sitting at gates, on ramps, taxing out, or shortly after take off after sitting with the air handling units running under ~ empty CWT's. There are now "Air Safety Directives" stipulating/requiring certain operating protocols to minimize this hazard associated with the "Boeing CWT Design Philosophy". Splaps Boy is correct in that the A/C is not a "bomb" in the conventional sense of large object full of high explosive that is gravity-dropped on a target, but a Boeing 7x7 aircraft's CWT with the right fuel-air mixture if detonated can equal several sticks of dynamite in explosive power. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"John Mazor" wrote:
"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote "Duster" wrote in message Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better though.. Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low heat. That, and Tarver being an engineer, reminds me of the old joke: an engineer is someone who thinks that, if your left leg is in a bucket of hot water and your right leg is in a bucket of ice, then on average, you're comfortable. Keyboard! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Duster" wrote in message m... Could you point me to the thread? This sounds intersting... Duster This has been an "On Going" exchange in many threads over a period of time. Tarver being an EE can't get a grip on the concept that the "explosive limits of fuel vapours in the Uleage of CWT's" vary with temp, pressure, & air content as the vent system functions. The normal protocal for ADA is to "Bottom Post", makeing it much easier to follow. Be warned to expect less than "Courterous Treatment" when dealing with Tarver aka "Splaps Boy/Splappy" the self described font of all knowledge things A/C & Aviation. If you do not believe this, just ask him. Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type "Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message .. . "Duster" wrote in message . .. Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better though.. Duster Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low heat. There have been several incidents world wide where Boeing A/C of various models have exploded sitting at gates, on ramps, taxing out, or shortly after take off after sitting with the air handling units running under ~ empty CWT's. There are now "Air Safety Directives" stipulating/requiring certain operating protocols to minimize this hazard associated with the "Boeing CWT Design Philosophy". Ralph Nesbitt Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
turbo video | Peter Holm | Aerobatics | 13 | September 29th 04 11:31 PM |
Aviation Video: Another F-16 bites the dust | Iwan Bogels | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | September 21st 04 07:02 AM |
In-Flight Video | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 11 | May 16th 04 06:11 AM |
B-36 Video | Dave Jones | Military Aviation | 0 | November 15th 03 04:05 PM |
"Support Our Troops" Video (Link) | dave911 | Military Aviation | 0 | July 29th 03 06:59 AM |