A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CF-xxx vs. C-Fxxx



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 5th 05, 11:51 PM
Marc CYBW
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CF-xxx vs. C-Fxxx

Hi,

Any Canadians out there know why older aircraft have a CF prefix while it
seems all newer registrations are CF- ?


  #2  
Old October 6th 05, 12:08 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Marc CYBW" wrote in message
news:rNY0f.1779$y_1.1412@edtnps89...

Any Canadians out there know why older aircraft have a CF prefix while it
seems all newer registrations are CF- ?


What's the difference?


  #3  
Old October 6th 05, 12:28 AM
Marc CYBW
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Oops

The old are CF-xxx
The newer ones are C-Fxxx (The hyphen is between the C and F (or C and G in
some cases, as in C-GMTF)

Marc



"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Marc CYBW" wrote in message
news:rNY0f.1779$y_1.1412@edtnps89...

Any Canadians out there know why older aircraft have a CF prefix while it
seems all newer registrations are CF- ?


What's the difference?



  #4  
Old October 6th 05, 01:00 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Marc CYBW" wrote in message
news:zkZ0f.1796$y_1.286@edtnps89...

Oops

The old are CF-xxx
The newer ones are C-Fxxx (The hyphen is between the C and F (or C and G
in some cases, as in C-GMTF)


Still doesn't look like a significant difference to me. Why bother with the
hyphen at all?


  #5  
Old October 6th 05, 02:23 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When I was learning to fly in '73 the change in
registrations came about. They had run out of CF numbers, having run
through CF-AAA to CF-ZZZ, with some left out for obvious reasons, so
they went to the C- format, starting with C-GXXX, and as older
airplanes were repainted they were converted from CF-ABC to C-FABC.
Ultralights became C-IXXX airplanes.
Some conversions were hilarious, like a 172 not far from he
C-FEAR.

The dash conforms with most of the rest of the world's
formats. Britain is G-XXXX, Germany D-XXXX, and so on. I have a book at
work that lists them all. Some have a single letter prefix, some have
two.

Dan

  #6  
Old October 6th 05, 02:54 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
ups.com...

When I was learning to fly in '73 the change in registrations came about.
They had run out of CF numbers, having run through CF-AAA to CF-ZZZ,
with some left out for obvious reasons, so they went to the C- format,
starting with C-GXXX, and as older airplanes were repainted they were
converted from CF-ABC to C-FABC.


They had run out of numbers?


  #7  
Old October 6th 05, 02:59 AM
Marc CYBW
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks!

Marc


wrote in message
ups.com...
When I was learning to fly in '73 the change in
registrations came about. They had run out of CF numbers, having run
through CF-AAA to CF-ZZZ, with some left out for obvious reasons, so
they went to the C- format, starting with C-GXXX, and as older
airplanes were repainted they were converted from CF-ABC to C-FABC.
Ultralights became C-IXXX airplanes.
Some conversions were hilarious, like a 172 not far from he
C-FEAR.

The dash conforms with most of the rest of the world's
formats. Britain is G-XXXX, Germany D-XXXX, and so on. I have a book at
work that lists them all. Some have a single letter prefix, some have
two.

Dan



  #9  
Old October 6th 05, 04:00 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:qm01f.9782$_a6.6030@trndny02...

So, as older planes are repainted, they'll run out of numbers again. Sort
of defeats the avowed purpose of changing the scheme.


What numbers?


  #10  
Old October 6th 05, 04:50 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote

They had run out of numbers?


Steven, did you just make a funny? I didn't know you had it in you! g

Still, you should put a g or :-) or something, just so that the unknowing
don't think that you are ignorant or something. ;-)
--
Jim in NC

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.