A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lidle crash: who is wrong?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 12th 06, 12:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Blasto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

Confusing reports on the Lidle crash-- Mayor Bloomberg, sounding
utterly confident in his sources, says the plane took off from
Teterboro, circled the Statue of Liberty, flew up (south-to-north) the
East River, then into the building. A few minutes earlier, a CNN
reporter using PASSUR asserted that after taking off the plane tracked
straight west-to-east over Central Park, turned right and followed the
East River (north-to-south) and suddenly banked right into the
building. Given that the impact was on the building's north face, the
latter account seems more likely.

Anyone have newer info?

--
B

  #2  
Old October 12th 06, 12:47 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,045
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

Blasto wrote:

A few minutes earlier, a CNN
reporter using PASSUR asserted that after taking off the plane tracked
straight west-to-east over Central Park, turned right and followed the
East River (north-to-south) and suddenly banked right into the
building. Given that the impact was on the building's north face, the
latter account seems more likely.


That is not how the Passur data depicts the several minutes prior to the
crash. The Mayor's account is what is depicted.

--
Peter
  #3  
Old October 12th 06, 01:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Blasto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?


Peter R. wrote:
Blasto wrote:

A few minutes earlier, a CNN
reporter using PASSUR asserted that after taking off the plane tracked
straight west-to-east over Central Park, turned right and followed the
East River (north-to-south) and suddenly banked right into the
building. Given that the impact was on the building's north face, the
latter account seems more likely.


That is not how the Passur data depicts the several minutes prior to the
crash. The Mayor's account is what is depicted.

--
Peter


Well, one thing that's needed is a definite time for the crash. If you
set Passur for 2:38 you'll see a plane following the CNN account
(although CNN has now switched to the Mayor's version)... In fact if
you just stare at Passur for a little while you'll see planes all over
the place dropping from the display where there are no airports.

So assuming the up-the-East-River account is correct, how did Lidle (or
the instructor) manage to hit the north face of the building? That
seems an impossibly tight turn.

--
B

  #4  
Old October 12th 06, 01:35 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Blasto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

oops.. I meant 2:28. Then at 2:30 you'll see a plane disappear pretty
much right 72nd and the river.

--
B

  #5  
Old October 12th 06, 02:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 252
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

"Blasto" wrote in message
ups.com...
So assuming the up-the-East-River account is correct, how did Lidle (or
the instructor) manage to hit the north face of the building? That
seems an impossibly tight turn.


It's not impossibly tight if it's planned and executed properly. In fact,
there's no (legal) choice but to make the turn. The VFR corridor over the
East River ends at the northern tip of Roosevelt Island. At that point, you
either make a U-turn or bust LGA's Class B (unless you have a clearance).

--Gary


  #6  
Old October 12th 06, 02:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,045
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

Blasto wrote:

In fact if
you just stare at Passur for a little while you'll see planes all over
the place dropping from the display where there are no airports.


Aircraft appear and disappear in Passur presumably due the sporadic radar
returns caused by the low altitudes flown by aircraft in those VFR
corridors combined with the tall buildings of the area.

So assuming the up-the-East-River account is correct, how did Lidle (or
the instructor) manage to hit the north face of the building? That
seems an impossibly tight turn.


As Gary indicated, aircraft flying up the east side of Manhattan in
the VFR corridor are required to turn around and fly back to the south,
as the corridor ends around the north end of Roosevelt Island.

How does an aircraft hit the north face of a building along the river
there? One possibility is that the pilot lost control of the aircraft
during the turn, say due to a stall. Another possibility is that the pilot
misjudged the point at which to begin the turn.

--
Peter
  #7  
Old October 12th 06, 02:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

"Gary Drescher" wrote:
It's not impossibly tight if it's planned and executed properly. In fact,
there's no (legal) choice but to make the turn. The VFR corridor over the
East River ends at the northern tip of Roosevelt Island. At that point, you
either make a U-turn or bust LGA's Class B (unless you have a clearance).


Or land.
  #8  
Old October 12th 06, 02:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 252
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

"Peter R." wrote in message
...
As Gary indicated, aircraft flying up the east side of Manhattan in
the VFR corridor are required to turn around and fly back to the south,
as the corridor ends around the north end of Roosevelt Island.

How does an aircraft hit the north face of a building along the river
there? One possibility is that the pilot lost control of the aircraft
during the turn, say due to a stall. Another possibility is that the
pilot
misjudged the point at which to begin the turn.


My guess is that they flew too fast and failed to remember that the turn
radius increases with the square of the airspeed. When they saw the
buildings coming, they banked steeply, causing them to descend and possibly
stall. (A witness on the ground who is also a pilot reported seeing the
plane in an unusually steep bank just before impact.)

--Gary


  #9  
Old October 12th 06, 03:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

Google for "524 e 72nd st.,new york city" and look at the
sat photo. There is a soccer field just northeast across
the river. IF they were having some engine problem, that
could have looked like the best place to land. Passing the
tops of the buildings and with probable winds aloft being
twice as strong as surface winds [maybe 25 kts. ] and the
venturi effect, the plane could have easily been turned
directly into the building. Just a guess.



"Blasto" wrote in message
ups.com...
| Confusing reports on the Lidle crash-- Mayor Bloomberg,
sounding
| utterly confident in his sources, says the plane took off
from
| Teterboro, circled the Statue of Liberty, flew up
(south-to-north) the
| East River, then into the building. A few minutes earlier,
a CNN
| reporter using PASSUR asserted that after taking off the
plane tracked
| straight west-to-east over Central Park, turned right and
followed the
| East River (north-to-south) and suddenly banked right into
the
| building. Given that the impact was on the building's
north face, the
| latter account seems more likely.
|
| Anyone have newer info?
|
| --
| B
|


  #10  
Old October 12th 06, 03:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
James Robinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 180
Default Lidle crash: who is wrong?

"Blasto" wrote:

Well, one thing that's needed is a definite time for the crash. If you
set Passur for 2:38 you'll see a plane following the CNN account
(although CNN has now switched to the Mayor's version)... In fact if
you just stare at Passur for a little while you'll see planes all over
the place dropping from the display where there are no airports.

So assuming the up-the-East-River account is correct, how did Lidle (or
the instructor) manage to hit the north face of the building? That
seems an impossibly tight turn.


You get different data from the different airports in Passur. If you use
EWR as the base airport, you can see the plane made two turns around the
Statue of Liberty, which you can't see from the other airports.

If look at the LaGuardia feed, you can not only use the 10 mile scale, you
can also see the aircraft fly up to Roosevelt Island, then make a 180 turn
toward the left before disappearing.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Doubts raised in jet crash Dave Butler Piloting 8 July 26th 05 01:25 AM
update on Montrose crash Bob Moore Piloting 3 November 29th 04 02:38 PM
Homemade plane crash Big John Home Built 9 October 17th 03 06:45 PM
Glider/Skydiving Crash dm Soaring 0 September 27th 03 05:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.