If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:20:34 GMT, Ed Rasimus
wrote: As I recall the X-29 project, one of the objectives was evaluation of the instability as a means of gaining agility for future highly maneuverable aircraft. The "urban legend" was that the aircraft required minimum of triple redundant FBW augmentation as loss of the augmentation would result in immediate excursions from stable flight and structural failure within seconds. The ultimate in "JC maneuvers". Well, it didn't have to have all three computers working, just one, which could have been the fourth, back-up one. But that wasn't a long-term sort of thing. However, it didn't hang around for seconds before it pitched up. stalled, and departed controlled flight. Time to double amplitude was a small fraction of a second, although I can't remember the number. It was smaller than that of the F-16, but the F-16 isn't very unstable (it's neutrally stable clean and full of fuel and could be flown, albeit rather oddly, without augmentation until enough fuel burned off, not that anyone except VISTA would try this). The X-29 was statically unstable because the project was a technology demonstrator for agile aircraft with forward-swept wings, aircraft that were stall-resistant. It wasn't statically unstable because it had a forward-swept wing. Always thought it made for an extremely ugly airplane. I thought it wasn't all that bad looking, myself. The X-31 was rather plain, but the X-29 was OK. Wasn't the basic structure from an F-16A? No, that was the X-31, I think, at least for the gear and cockpit. The X-29 used a couple of F-5s for the fuselages. I don't remember how far aft the F-5 airframe went, but it definitely included the cockpit and surrounding structure, as well as the gear, as I recall. Mary -- Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
German forward swept wing WWII fighter projects. | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 4 | January 11th 04 01:49 PM |
Canard planes swept wing outer VG's? | Paul Lee | Home Built | 8 | January 4th 04 08:10 PM |
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | September 29th 03 03:40 PM |
Can someone explain wing loading? | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 4 | September 10th 03 02:33 AM |
Wing Extensions | Jay | Home Built | 22 | July 27th 03 12:23 PM |