If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Rapoport" wrote
I see this all the time too but I don't really buy off on it. I don't hear of known-ice piston 135 charter and freight flights not making their destinations becasue of ice. Yeah, but you do hear about one falling out of the sky every once in a while. I think that if you have a known ice airplane and everything is in proper working order, you should be capable of flying in 99% of icing. The trick, of course, is recognizing the 1% you can't fly in before it's too late. This doesn't mean that there won't be tense moments and obviously having more performance is better but I don't see why any known ice airplane isn't adequate to the job. A good friend of mine has lots of experience in known-ice piston twins (acquired on the way up to the airlines) and gave me some advice when it looked like I might be moving into one (when it looked like I might have to move North for professional reasons). His position is that flying a piston airplane in icing conditions requires careful attention to maintenance (his experience is that most piston deice systems are poorly maintained) and a significantly greater level of weather savvy and skill (relative to flying a jet, which requires none - all icing problem go away at 400 kts indicated) but it can be done, and will allow the completion of the vast majority of missions in icing conditions. I suspect it's similar to the Stormscope vs. RADAR deal. I hear people say that a Stromscope is just a way of knowing that there's stuff out there and it's time to land, not a way of flying around T-storms. In reality, I live in T-storm central and have yet to cancel a flight because of T-storms. I have made some deviations, but so does a RADAR-equipped airplane. I have had some tense moments, and obviously having RADAR would have been better. Of course this is predicated on the Stormscope working properly. Proper operation means that when the sky is dead (meaning the air is smooth as glass, and any clouds are stratiform) you can fly around for hours without seeing a dot on the most sensitive setting. In reality, most avionics shops are not competent to perform such an installation and less than 20% of spherics devices function that way. These are simply specific instances of a more general rule - if you want to fly difficult weather in less capable equipment, you need to be a more capable pilot, but it can usually be done. Michael |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
It is possible to get icing if you were recently in colder air such that the airframe got cold-soaked and has not warmed to above
freezing yet. I've picked up ice in a descent that way before, but it doesn't take long before it goes way. -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Descending through a thin icing layer | Wyatt Emmerich | Instrument Flight Rules | 70 | December 31st 03 05:17 AM |
FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 07:44 PM |
Supercooled Water - More on Icing | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 50 | December 11th 03 01:20 PM |
FAR 91.157 Operating in icing conditions | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 98 | December 11th 03 06:58 AM |
snow and icing | Teacherjh | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | December 10th 03 04:00 AM |