A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What Argus Says about the As 014



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 22nd 04, 06:20 AM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default What Argus Says about the As 014

http://www.luftarchiv.de/motoren/argus.htm

Please note that "Argus As 014 Staustrahltriebwerke" translates into
"Argus As 014 RAMJET"
And NO, a gas turbine is NOT closer to a RAMJET than a Pulsejet
because neither the Ramjet or its primitive form, the pulsejet have a
compressor or turbine. My original comments on the pulsejet has always
been that the Germans were the ones that called it an intermittent
ramjet, or athodyd.
The V-1 was launched off a ramp or an aircraft at 250 mph for the
pulsejet to work independently. On the ground the firing of the engine
(according to numerous sources) lasted just 7 seconds by remote
control with compressed air and fuel pumped into the stovepipe to get
it up to operating temperature.
It was the 16-17g launch up to 250mph that got the As 014 operating
independently.

Sources:

"German Weapons of World War II": "the launch gear was important,
since the pulse jet engine needed to be at flying speed before it
would work"- pg 114

"Germany's Secret Weapons in World War II": "The device must be
accellerated by some external means to a critical threshold velocity,
something of the order of 300km/h (186 mph) before it will work..."
pgs 62-63
" the launch procedure was straightforward. The pulse jet was fired up
and allowed to run for 7 seconds, bringing it up to the correct
operating temperature" pg 66
rest of launch sequence as in my earlier post pgs 66-67

"The Last Year of the Luftwaffe May 1944 to May 1945": "The missile
accelerated rapidly and when it left the end of the 156 ft ramp it was
moving at 250 mph, comfortably above minimum flying speed" pgs 81-82

"German Secret Weapons of the Second World War" by Ian Hogg: "just off
to the left side of the ramp was the 'distributor unit' mounted on a
steel platform. This carried more compressed air tanks, pressure
guages, and distrubution valves supplying compressed air to the
missile, firstly to blow air into the front of the duct and simulate
flight, and secondly to switch on the fuel valve (and switch it off
again should there be any malfunction). There was also a transformer
and trembler coil which supplied power to the engine spark plug by
flexible lead" pg 20

Get the picture now? The V-1 pulsejet wasn't running on its own on the
ramp.
I have lots more references should you require them.

Rob
  #2  
Old January 22nd 04, 09:35 AM
JasiekS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Uzytkownik "robert arndt" napisal w wiadomosci
om...
http://www.luftarchiv.de/motoren/argus.htm

Please note that "Argus As 014 Staustrahltriebwerke" translates into
"Argus As 014 RAMJET"
And NO, a gas turbine is NOT closer to a RAMJET than a Pulsejet
because neither the Ramjet or its primitive form, the pulsejet have a
compressor or turbine. My original comments on the pulsejet has always
been that the Germans were the ones that called it an intermittent
ramjet, or athodyd.

[snip..]

Rob, you CANNOT tell about principles of how something works coming from
clasification only.
Please analyze following example: gliders, aircraft and helicopters (and
many others too) belong to the same group of vehicles called AERODYNES. Do
they work the same way? Can you tell 'glider is a simplified aircraft'?
Maybe. Can you tell 'helicopter is something like glider, but more
complicated'? SURELY NOT!

Ramjets and pulsejets (and turbojets, and turboprops and turbofans...)
belong to the group 'Strahltriebwerke'. Do they work the same way? NOT!
Common is only that some airstream ('Strahl') is coming into, gain some
energy (combustion) and goes out doing some useful work (direct thrust or
shp). All but one are working in the same thermodynamic combustion cycle:
constant pressure combustion. You guess WHICH one is different? YES, the
pulsejets are working in the constant volume combustion cycle.
'Staustrahltriebwerk' means only that incomin air is compressed in
aerodynamical way - withot use of any mechanically driven compressors. AFAIK
scramjets belong to the same 'Staustrahltriebwerke' branch of the general
'Strahltriebwerke' group. Do you see much common features between pulsejets
and scramjets?


Rob


Regards
JasiekS
Warsaw, Poland


  #3  
Old January 22nd 04, 09:47 AM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
http://www.luftarchiv.de/motoren/argus.htm



Get the picture now? The V-1 pulsejet wasn't running on its own on the
ramp.
I have lots more references should you require them.


Trouble is the video of the launch clearly shows it was

http://www.aardvark.co.nz/pjet/images/v101.mpg
http://www.aardvark.co.nz/pjet/images/v102.mpg

Keith


  #4  
Old January 22nd 04, 04:33 PM
robert arndt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
http://www.luftarchiv.de/motoren/argus.htm



Get the picture now? The V-1 pulsejet wasn't running on its own on the
ramp.
I have lots more references should you require them.


Trouble is the video of the launch clearly shows it was

http://www.aardvark.co.nz/pjet/images/v101.mpg
http://www.aardvark.co.nz/pjet/images/v102.mpg

Keith


Trouble is (if YOU watched video 1 closely) the pulsejet is running
off the distributor unit which is barely seen off to the left of the
ramp and the spark plug flexible lead connection is spotted too.
Since it took at least 186 mph for the As 014 to run independently
there is NO WAY it is running on its own on the ramp. The distributor
unit is operating it by remote control forcing compressed air and 75
octane fuel into the stovepipe, Ignition is remote controlled too.
Time warming up on the ramp- 7 seconds.

Rob
  #5  
Old January 22nd 04, 05:37 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message

...
"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
http://www.luftarchiv.de/motoren/argus.htm



Get the picture now? The V-1 pulsejet wasn't running on its own on the
ramp.
I have lots more references should you require them.


Trouble is the video of the launch clearly shows it was

http://www.aardvark.co.nz/pjet/images/v101.mpg
http://www.aardvark.co.nz/pjet/images/v102.mpg

Keith


Trouble is (if YOU watched video 1 closely) the pulsejet is running
off the distributor unit which is barely seen off to the left of the
ramp and the spark plug flexible lead connection is spotted too.



But there is no air being forced into the intake and no fuel connection.

Nobody denies an external air source and spark were needed
to start the thing but once it was running it clearly COULD
keep going with no ram air, hell you can even see the
valves cycling as it works

Since it took at least 186 mph for the As 014 to run independently
there is NO WAY it is running on its own on the ramp. The distributor
unit is operating it by remote control forcing compressed air and 75
octane fuel into the stovepipe,


HOW ?

There is nothing connected to force air into the intake,
the only connection is the spark plug lead

Here we have 2 videos both showing the same thing,
an engine running without ram air BEFORE take off.

Ignition is remote controlled too.
Time warming up on the ramp- 7 seconds.


I dont doubt they ran it on the ramp before launch, but its clear
that the engines in both clips were running WITHOUT an external
air source at launch.

It could hardly work otherwise since as you say it needed
that spark lead for starting and it clearly wasnt 200 yards long.

Keith




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS : GPS Trimble TLN 2000 + Moving Map ARGUS 7000 PA34 F-GFTF Aviation Marketplace 0 January 9th 05 08:42 PM
Carrier Islands Thomas W Ping Military Aviation 76 December 14th 03 12:13 PM
Argus 5000CE question Francois Marquis Instrument Flight Rules 5 August 2nd 03 10:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.