If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Peter Kemp peter_n_kempathotmaildotcom@ wrote: Mosquito, no question. Reliable, fun to fly, seats two, plus carries up to 4,000lb of "baggage". Of course finding one to buy could be a little tricky, but we are talking fantasy here. Hmmm, if you're thinking of a twin I'd go with the P-61 Black Widow. You'll need an LOA but oh man, talk about an evil looking airplane!! Think of the excitement you'll cause among the "black helicopter" crowd. G -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Matt:
You are right......we are refining this thing. A T-28A in Standard category does not need an LOA, while the T-28B/C in Experimental does need an LOA. VL |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
ArtKramr wrote:
From: (MLenoch) Correction: A T-28 does require a LOA letter. A limited licensed P-51D does not require a LOA letter. V Lenoch LOOA How come no one chose a B-26 Martin Marauder? You guys don't know what good is. (grin) Because there's only one around these days, and its owner isn't entertaining offers. -Marc -- Marc Reeve actual email address after removal of 4s & spaces is c4m4r4a4m4a4n a4t c4r4u4z4i4o d4o4t c4o4m |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
ArtKramr wrote:
Subject: Best warbird to own From: redc1c4 Date: 11/8/03 1:56 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: 3FACBDC3.5ED1728C@drunk "Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear considerable watching." Army Officer's Guide Of course we know that is a joke and there is no such statement in the Officers Guide. Not in my copy anyway. purportedly, it's from the 19th century.....and i find it humorous. no offense is meant to, or should be taken by, most, but i have had the distinct pleasure* of serving under a few who's actions made it clear that they felt that way....... btw, i like your site, and the stories. thanks for putting it up. redc1c4, *not sure they enjoyed it, but i did. %-) -- "Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear considerable watching." Army Officer's Guide |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
ArtKramr wrote:
Subject: Best warbird to own From: (MLenoch) Date: 11/8/03 5:30 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Correction: A T-28 does require a LOA letter. A limited licensed P-51D does not require a LOA letter. V Lenoch LOOA How come no one chose a B-26 Martin Marauder? You guys don't know what good is. (grin) serious question: are there any left in flying condition? redc1c4, who's buying a war bird as soon as i win the Lotto.......... %-) -- "Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear considerable watching." Army Officer's Guide |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 18:10:46 GMT, redc1c4 wrote:
who's buying a war bird as soon as i win the Lotto.......... %-) Mint juleps and military aviation don't mix... do they? -Jeff B. (who knows that wouldn't stop you) yeff at erols dot com |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
G.R. Patterson III wrote:
Gregg Germain wrote: THREE guys? Wow I'm impressed. Was one in the nose? ;^) There was a modification of the P-38 that added a passenger seat in the nose. The troops gave it the nickname "droop-snoot". Since it replaced the guns, it was not a popular mod with the pilots. The military radio gear lived in a hole behind the pilot and was quite substantial. Remove that, and you can fit a rather cramped seat back there. Not exactly a "passenger" seat, but rather another crew position for use as a level bomber, employing a Norden bombsight and a bombardier. Also, the P-38M night fighter variant had a second seat installed behind and above the pilot, with it's own canopy hatch- not sure what they did with the radios. Mike |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Yeff wrote:
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 18:10:46 GMT, redc1c4 wrote: who's buying a war bird as soon as i win the Lotto.......... %-) Mint juleps and military aviation don't mix... do they? -Jeff B. (who knows that wouldn't stop you) yeff at erols dot com couldn't tell ya..... OTOH, mint julep martinis are an entirely different animal. guns & alcohol don't mix though*. redc1c4, *the alcohol messes up the finish, the oil makes your drink taste funny, and worst of all, you waste part of your drink. %-) -- "Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear considerable watching." Army Officer's Guide |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Dale wrote:
In article , "G.R. Patterson III" wrote: orary fighters. The balance problem is caused by the aft fuselage tank. Many Mustangs have had this removed. In any case, you won't need to fill it unless you're planning a 1600 mile trip. Stall speed in military configuration was about 95, which isn't out of line with other fighters of the era and is actually a bit lower than the Bf-109. I've read, however, that the plane doesn't give warning before the stall and drops the left wing dramatically when it does. Len Deighton claims that few military pilots three-pointed the Mustang because that gets you too close to the stall speed. Some years back, I got to watch 52 of these planes land at Sun'n Fun. Every landing was a wheel landing with the tail slightly low. I only have 1 hour in a Mustang, but when doing stalls it gave plenty of warning with the stall occuring at about 81KIAS. We did not however do any accelerated stalls. That's interesting about 'little warning' and dropping the 'left' wing. I'm only familiar with some heavies and they all gave lots of warning, very 'fine' buffeting progressing to coarser and higher amplitudes before the 'real thing'. Also they all six dropped the 'right' wing. Would that be a function of the prop rotation direction? I notice that all six had right hand rotation, does the Mustang have left hand rotation?, or is it some other factor that causes this?. -- -Gord. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
redc1c4 writes: Yeff wrote: On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 18:10:46 GMT, redc1c4 wrote: who's buying a war bird as soon as i win the Lotto.......... %-) Mint juleps and military aviation don't mix... do they? -Jeff B. (who knows that wouldn't stop you) yeff at erols dot com couldn't tell ya..... OTOH, mint julep martinis are an entirely different animal. guns & alcohol don't mix though*. Alcohol and Gasoline do, but it tastes terrible. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Military & vintage warbird slides for sale | Wings Of Fury | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 10th 04 01:17 AM |
FA: 5 Airplane Model Kits - Bomber, Jet, Warbird | Disgo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 22nd 04 05:00 PM |
FS: Aircraft Instruments Parts Avionics Warbird Parts | Bill Berle | Home Built | 0 | January 10th 04 02:20 AM |
New B-24 Double Feature Now Showuing at Zeno's Warbird VideoDrive-In! | Zeno | Military Aviation | 0 | September 16th 03 03:59 PM |
Warbird Runway Crash | Mark and Kim Smith | Military Aviation | 3 | September 14th 03 07:47 PM |