A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Products
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Weekly News Statistics for demon.local: week ending 14 Sep 2007.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 23rd 07, 01:59 AM posted to demon.local,alt.talk.bollocks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.products
Michael Baldwin, Bruce[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 642
Default Weekly News Statistics for demon.local: week ending 14 Sep 2007.

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:44:21 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:31:31 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:37:15 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:22:09 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
All you have proven is you have less of a life than me.

Au contraire, PHucker. If anything, I lead a more vibrant life than
you.

A vibrant life on usenet, yes ok......

And elsewhere. At least I don't have parrots squawking about the place
at all hours.

They shut up at night.

What? You tape their little beaks up?

I switch the lights off.


I see. Butt, of course, you wouldn't! A0L!


What?


You wouldn't see with the lights off.

2. anonym............................................ : 115 16.4 8.7%
3. ah...............................................: 75 10.7 5.7%
4. @@^.............................................. : 73 10.4 5.5%
5. John \"C\.........................................: 68 9.7 5.2%
6. Paul {Hamilton Rooney}............................: 62 8.9 4.7%
7. Naked Gonad.......................................: 54 7.7 4.1%
8. Mr Pounder........................................: 53 7.6 4.0%
9. Peter Hucker......................................: 50 7.1 3.8%

A0L! Barely scraped into the top 10.

Is it possible to brush your teeth without wiggling your ass?

Why would you wiggle your arse when brushing you teeth? ... oh!

Conservation of angular momentum.

On what basis do you make that k'lame?

Physics.

What does that have to do with arses, PHucker?

Angular arse rotation is due to physics.


I suspect you like to get physical with arses.


Obsession noted.


Yes, I have noted your obsession.

When they found out their wives were attending a sex-toy party,
the husbands refused to go and pick them up,
and instead left them to their own devices.

That was lame.

But amusing.

Indeed.

[Bows]


Don't flatter yourself.


You did it for me.


I did not!

If it's zero degrees outside today and it's supposed to be twice as cold tomorrow, how cold is it going to be?


Why ask me?


I was asking the group in general. Don't think the group is all about you. Egotist.


Well, its not all about you.

Nevertheless, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is not to be
considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. Thus a
subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not
subject to the strong generative capacity of the theory. Of course, the
notion of level of grammaticalness is necessary to impose an interpretation
on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance
scope of a complex symbol. Conversely, any associated supporting element is
to be regarded as an abstract underlying order. Furthermore, this analysis
of a formative as a pair of sets of features does not readily tolerate
irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.


Come again?

Ads
  #12  
Old October 2nd 07, 03:07 AM posted to demon.local,alt.talk.bollocks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.products
Michael Baldwin, Bruce[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 642
Default Weekly News Statistics for demon.local: week ending 14 Sep 2007.

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:59:03 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:44:21 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:31:31 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:37:15 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:22:09 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
All you have proven is you have less of a life than me.

Au contraire, PHucker. If anything, I lead a more vibrant life than
you.

A vibrant life on usenet, yes ok......

And elsewhere. At least I don't have parrots squawking about the place
at all hours.

They shut up at night.

What? You tape their little beaks up?

I switch the lights off.

I see. Butt, of course, you wouldn't! A0L!

What?


You wouldn't see with the lights off.


I don't live in the middle of nowhere. There is no such thing as darkness here.


So you never get dark and stormy nights?

2. anonym............................................ : 115 16.4 8.7%
3. ah...............................................: 75 10.7 5.7%
4. @@^.............................................. : 73 10.4 5.5%
5. John \"C\.........................................: 68 9.7 5.2%
6. Paul {Hamilton Rooney}............................: 62 8.9 4.7%
7. Naked Gonad.......................................: 54 7.7 4.1%
8. Mr Pounder........................................: 53 7.6 4.0%
9. Peter Hucker......................................: 50 7.1 3.8%

A0L! Barely scraped into the top 10.

Is it possible to brush your teeth without wiggling your ass?

Why would you wiggle your arse when brushing you teeth? ... oh!

Conservation of angular momentum.

On what basis do you make that k'lame?

Physics.

What does that have to do with arses, PHucker?

Angular arse rotation is due to physics.

I suspect you like to get physical with arses.

Obsession noted.


Yes, I have noted your obsession.


pwease learn more engrish you siwwy jap.


Baka daro!

When they found out their wives were attending a sex-toy party,
the husbands refused to go and pick them up,
and instead left them to their own devices.

That was lame.

But amusing.

Indeed.

[Bows]

Don't flatter yourself.

You did it for me.


I did not!


Did sew!


I did knot!

If it's zero degrees outside today and it's supposed to be twice as cold tomorrow, how cold is it going to be?

Why ask me?

I was asking the group in general. Don't think the group is all about you. Egotist.


Well, its not all about you.


You have a few billion more people to rule out yet.


Right! Hands up anyone else reading this.

Nevertheless, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is not to be
considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. Thus a
subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not
subject to the strong generative capacity of the theory. Of course, the
notion of level of grammaticalness is necessary to impose an interpretation
on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance
scope of a complex symbol. Conversely, any associated supporting element is
to be regarded as an abstract underlying order. Furthermore, this analysis
of a formative as a pair of sets of features does not readily tolerate
irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.


Come again?


Over your head?


Yuck! You're gross!

  #13  
Old October 5th 07, 02:05 PM posted to demon.local,alt.talk.bollocks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.products
Michael Baldwin, Bruce[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 642
Default Weekly News Statistics for demon.local: week ending 14 Sep 2007.

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:07:13 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:59:03 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:44:21 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:31:31 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

What? You tape their little beaks up?

I switch the lights off.

I see. Butt, of course, you wouldn't! A0L!

What?

You wouldn't see with the lights off.

I don't live in the middle of nowhere. There is no such thing as darkness here.


So you never get dark and stormy nights?


Not with streetlighting. It was nice in a powercut once. It confuses the neighbours when my lights continue to work.


Your gerbils work overtime on that treadmill of yours?

On what basis do you make that k'lame?

Physics.

What does that have to do with arses, PHucker?

Angular arse rotation is due to physics.

I suspect you like to get physical with arses.

Obsession noted.

Yes, I have noted your obsession.

pwease learn more engrish you siwwy jap.


Baka daro!


What?


Stupid fool.

If it's zero degrees outside today and it's supposed to be twice as cold tomorrow, how cold is it going to be?

Why ask me?

I was asking the group in general. Don't think the group is all about you. Egotist.

Well, its not all about you.

You have a few billion more people to rule out yet.


Right! Hands up anyone else reading this.


They don't have to be reading this for the group to be about them. Maybe the group is about Neil Barker?


That fat ****? No way!

Nevertheless, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is not to be
considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. Thus a
subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not
subject to the strong generative capacity of the theory. Of course, the
notion of level of grammaticalness is necessary to impose an interpretation
on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance
scope of a complex symbol. Conversely, any associated supporting element is
to be regarded as an abstract underlying order. Furthermore, this analysis
of a formative as a pair of sets of features does not readily tolerate
irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.

Come again?

Over your head?


Yuck! You're gross!


That's not what I meant, therefore you're gross.


No, I am not 144.

A Pakistani arrives in London City all excited. He stops the first person he meets. "Good day, Mr. British, thank you to accept me in Your nice country", but the person interrupts and says: "I am not British, I'm Chinese."
The Pakistani continues on his way and meets another passer-by. "Thank you Mr. British for to let my family and me stay here... " Again, he's interrupted before finishing his sentence. "I no be British, I be Turk!"
He goes a little farther and meets another person and greets him "thank you for letting me come to your beautiful country." ... "I'm not British, I'm Kosavon."
"But," answers the Pakistani distressed, "where are the British??"
The Kosavon looks at his watch and says ..... "Probably at work."


Typical, all the mooslimes are bludging.

  #14  
Old November 1st 07, 03:48 AM posted to demon.local,alt.talk.bollocks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.products
Michael Baldwin, Bruce[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 642
Default Weekly News Statistics for demon.local: week ending 14 Sep 2007.

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:05:28 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:07:13 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:59:03 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:44:21 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

Peter Hucker wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:31:31 +0100, Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:

What? You tape their little beaks up?

I switch the lights off.

I see. Butt, of course, you wouldn't! A0L!

What?

You wouldn't see with the lights off.

I don't live in the middle of nowhere. There is no such thing as darkness here.

So you never get dark and stormy nights?

Not with streetlighting. It was nice in a powercut once. It confuses the neighbours when my lights continue to work.


Your gerbils work overtime on that treadmill of yours?


See sig.


See sig run.

On what basis do you make that k'lame?

Physics.

What does that have to do with arses, PHucker?

Angular arse rotation is due to physics.

I suspect you like to get physical with arses.

Obsession noted.

Yes, I have noted your obsession.

pwease learn more engrish you siwwy jap.

Baka daro!

What?


Stupid fool.


Elaborate.


You stupid fool.

Nevertheless, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is not to be
considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. Thus a
subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not
subject to the strong generative capacity of the theory. Of course, the
notion of level of grammaticalness is necessary to impose an interpretation
on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance
scope of a complex symbol. Conversely, any associated supporting element is
to be regarded as an abstract underlying order. Furthermore, this analysis
of a formative as a pair of sets of features does not readily tolerate
irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.

Come again?

Over your head?

Yuck! You're gross!

That's not what I meant, therefore you're gross.


No, I am not 144.


Oh very funny.....


Yes, I thought so.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Monthly News Statistics for demon.local: month of Aug 2007. Peter Hucker[_2_] Products 91 November 4th 07 06:42 AM
Weekly News Statistics for demon.local: week ending 17 Aug 2007. Michael Baldwin, Bruce[_2_] Products 4 August 24th 07 01:29 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.