If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ...
I have seen DEs do this with applicants that they thought were marginal. They ask more questions to confirm their opinion one way or another. The applicant may flunk on some small item, but what the DE is really saying is that he wants the applicant to go back and study harder. He tells the applicant this, but the applicant does not necessarily mention that when she tells other people how her check ride went. Yes. That's why its critical that we have a good relationship with the DE. The DE should take the time to talk to the CFI after the checkride and debrief us. Whether the student passes or fails, its good to know what the DE's opinion was. It also allows you to warn students of items that a particular DE is focused on. -Robert |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ...
I have seen DEs do this with applicants that they thought were marginal. They ask more questions to confirm their opinion one way or another. The applicant may flunk on some small item, but what the DE is really saying is that he wants the applicant to go back and study harder. He tells the applicant this, but the applicant does not necessarily mention that when she tells other people how her check ride went. Yes. That's why its critical that we have a good relationship with the DE. The DE should take the time to talk to the CFI after the checkride and debrief us. Whether the student passes or fails, its good to know what the DE's opinion was. It also allows you to warn students of items that a particular DE is focused on. -Robert |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
First of all I want to thank everyone for their opinion and advise.
It's a real pleasure to have a forum like this to get honest opinions. Second, the situation has since been resolved to everyone's satisfaction.. My student continued the test the next day after I had a chance to lightly question the DE. At first, I really didn't want to address the issue about how dissatisfied the student was with the DE's personality. However after chit chatting with the DE for a few I ‘discovered' that the DE was on his 3rd day of all day check rides and was getting tired. Plus, it seems there was some miscommunication between the student and DE during the exam that might have lead to a misunderstanding and stress being placed on the student. However, on the final day of the check ride (3 days in all, weather was a factor), my student reported that the DE seems to be in a much better mood and was actually pleasant to fly with. In the end, the student ended up passing. What I've learned? In the future I'm going to establish a better relationship between myself the available DE's in my area. I take the blame for not devoting more attention to this. With that said, I still have some reservations about using this DE again. I understand that some ‘stress' is normal, however if the DE is taking it several steps further (due to his own fatigue or other factors), then I see that as a problem. One other factor I can now discuss is the DE's method of distracting/testing (?) the student. Seems even if the student is giving the DE a correct answer to a questions, the DE will look disappointed and shake their head in a disapproving manner. I've personally never heard of this tactic, but I think it's a poor method to use during an exam. So, thanks again for any comments. Fly safe, |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
True, but we had a really bad DE who used to give 8 hour orals to
PP-ASELs, and flunked them on silly stuff like this too. If he needs 8 hours to determine whether somebody posesses the level of knowledge for a PP-ASEL, then he's a pretty shaky examiner. If he needs more than a couple of hours to determine that (given the student already has passed the knowledge test), then I'm inclined to believe the problem is the DE, and not the student. BTW, This DE didn't stay a DE. He got the message when every CFI in the region refused to send him anyone. He worked out of the same airport as a popular (more reasonable) DE. The reasonable guy would have literally dozens of exams per week, the shaky guy none. Cap "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "OtisWinslow" wrote in message news There was one here that spent almost 8 hours with a PPL applicant and then flunked her on some little thing. Any CFI who would send a student to a DE like that has to be nuts. I have seen DEs do this with applicants that they thought were marginal. They ask more questions to confirm their opinion one way or another. The applicant may flunk on some small item, but what the DE is really saying is that he wants the applicant to go back and study harder. He tells the applicant this, but the applicant does not necessarily mention that when she tells other people how her check ride went. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Wasn't your checkride for Rec certificate, not private?
Cub Driver wrote in message . .. On 17 Aug 2004 10:45:02 -0700, (Mark) wrote: However, on the final day of the check ride Good grief! Perhaps I lucked out. I took my check ride on a very cold January day in New Hampshire (we didn't then have the 20-degree F restriction) in a very weary J-3 Cub. The examiner spent about twenty minutes quizzing me on the ground, then climbed into the front seat and asked me to turn west (right) at 600 feet. I confirmed: "Turning west at 1,000 feet," and did so, figuring that he was trying to catch me turning into potentially someone on base. But no; he just wanted to stay close to the airport, which we did for the next twenty minutes, then landed. He was *very* cold! I of course had learned to wear fleece-lined jeans and long underwear. In any event, it was hailed locally as the shortest checkout ever. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com Expedition sailboat charters www.expeditionsail.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Strange and/or really difficult approaches | SeeAndAvoid | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | February 24th 04 03:25 AM |
D'Amato's Role Investigated in La Guardia Airport Deal | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 0 | December 25th 03 05:47 AM |
BAE & Boeing sign £400,000,000 deal | Mycroft | Military Aviation | 9 | November 16th 03 06:41 PM |
Best deal on renter's insurance? | Evan Hunt | Piloting | 5 | August 16th 03 10:02 PM |