If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In rec.aviation.military Charles Talleyrand wrote:
: There are lots of P51s out there, so they are not rare enough. : Further, they are said to be even harder to fly than normal for : vintage and type. Where does it say P-51's are hard to fly? Or harder to fly than "normal"? --- Gregg "Improvise, adapt, overcome." Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Phone: (617) 496-1558 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:39:34 -0600, Alan Minyard
wrote in Message-Id: : How about an A-37 (or T-37) Tweety Bird? Two seats, reasonable handling, not too bad on fuel. Are these actually available? Do you have any idea of the going price? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"The Raven" wrote in message ...
"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message om... I'm fantasy shopping for my new warbird or historic aircraft. My requirements are ... - Historic value (rare and interesting aircraft) - Reasonably easy to fly - No turbines and under 12,500 lbs (no type rating needed) - Seats two - Aerobatic - Easy on the eyes I don't know enough to find the right aircraft. There are lots of P51s out there, so they are not rare enough. Further, they are said to be even harder to fly than normal for vintage and type. The P51 is one of the few WWII fighters that looks good in a two seat variant. Flying Me-109s are quite rare, but I've read they are just too tough to land and only seat one person. Two seat Spitfires are just ugly. The P38 and P39 are attactive because of the nosewheel gear. I understand that the P39 was also used as a trainer in WWII (so it might be easy to fly). A Folker Triplane is probably a reasonable plane to fly, but I have no desire to bath in castor oil and it only seats one person. My thinking suggests dive and torpedo bombers might be the solution. They typically seat two or more, and the naval aircraft should have reasonable low speed handling. Is this sound thinking? Would a Dauntless or Devistator or even a Stuka fit the requirements? What fantasy aircraft should I buy? There's a Wirraway for sale in Australia. Should hit max points for rarity in the US, I believe they are easy to fly and have parts commonality with other aircraft. See this one for sale, Cdn dollars...I know this aircraft and it is in great shape. The company also has others for sale. http://www.aviatorsale.com/aix446/ Joe Hine |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
In rec.aviation.military Ed Majden wrote:
: Back in the 1950's I saw a privately owned P38 with USA markings land at : the Regina airport in Saskatchewan. Three guys climbed out of it. They : un-screwed the back of a tip tank and removed their suitcases! Don't know : who owned it and I didn't write down the N---- tail number. I wonder if : this P38 is still around??? : Ed THREE guys? Wow I'm impressed. Was one in the nose? ;^) I've seen a film of Gary Cooper unfolding himself from teh back seat of a P-38 and he was really crammed in there. -- --- Gregg "Improvise, adapt, overcome." Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Phone: (617) 496-1558 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
In rec.aviation.military Roger Halstead wrote:
: On 7 Nov 2003 12:37:59 -0400, Gregg Germain : wrote: :In rec.aviation.military Charles Talleyrand wrote: : :: There are lots of P51s out there, so they are not rare enough. :: Further, they are said to be even harder to fly than normal for :: vintage and type. : : Where does it say P-51's are hard to fly? Or harder to fly than : "normal"? : Every thing is relative. That's why I added "Or harder to fly than 'normal'" and why I put normal in quotes. I'm curious as to how the conclusion was reached - it's certainly harder to fly than a Cessna 152, but not nearly as hard to fly as the space shuttle. I'm assuming he compared them to aircraft contemporary with the P-51 since he used the word "vintage". Was it harder to fly than the P-39? the 39 has some tough spin characteristics. Other than the 51 being somewhat less stable when the aft gas tank was full, I don't know of any other difficult characteristics. Just curious what he meant by "harder". --- Gregg "Improvise, adapt, overcome." Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Phone: (617) 496-1558 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Twydell" I'm fantasy shopping for my new warbird or historic aircraft. My The P38 and P39 are attactive because of the nosewheel gear. I understand that the P39 was also used as a trainer in WWII (so it might be easy to fly). Back in the 1950's I saw a privately owned P38 with USA markings land at the Regina airport in Saskatchewan. Three guys climbed out of it. They un-screwed the back of a tip tank and removed their suitcases! Don't know who owned it and I didn't write down the N---- tail number. I wonder if this P38 is still around??? Ed |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message om... I'm fantasy shopping for my new warbird or historic aircraft. My requirements are ... - Historic value (rare and interesting aircraft) - Reasonably easy to fly - No turbines and under 12,500 lbs (no type rating needed) - Seats two - Aerobatic - Easy on the eyes I have two brand new, less than 250 TT Henschel Hs 126, Greek Air Force markings. 100 K Euros each. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
On 7 Nov 2003 12:37:59 -0400, Gregg Germain
wrote: In rec.aviation.military Charles Talleyrand wrote: : There are lots of P51s out there, so they are not rare enough. : Further, they are said to be even harder to fly than normal for : vintage and type. Where does it say P-51's are hard to fly? Or harder to fly than "normal"? Every thing is relative. Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member) www.rogerhalstead.com N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2) --- Gregg "Improvise, adapt, overcome." Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Phone: (617) 496-1558 |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
rv4flyer wrote:
See this one for sale, Cdn dollars...I know this aircraft and it is in great shape. The company also has others for sale. http://www.aviatorsale.com/aix446/ The engine needs an immediate overhaul. As it said, TBO is 600 hours with a 50 hour extension. This bird has 632 on the engine. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN http://www.mortimerschnerd.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Military & vintage warbird slides for sale | Wings Of Fury | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 10th 04 01:17 AM |
FA: 5 Airplane Model Kits - Bomber, Jet, Warbird | Disgo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 22nd 04 05:00 PM |
FS: Aircraft Instruments Parts Avionics Warbird Parts | Bill Berle | Home Built | 0 | January 10th 04 02:20 AM |
New B-24 Double Feature Now Showuing at Zeno's Warbird VideoDrive-In! | Zeno | Military Aviation | 0 | September 16th 03 03:59 PM |
Warbird Runway Crash | Mark and Kim Smith | Military Aviation | 3 | September 14th 03 07:47 PM |