A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lieberman calls on Rumsfeld to resign



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 21st 06, 08:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Leadfoot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Lieberman calls on Rumsfeld to resign

One, it's a little late and the timing is a little suspicious.

Two, Joe might need a new job and he would be a leading candidate to replace
Rumsfeld

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060821/...nate_lieberman

Sen. Joe Lieberman, attacked by fellow Democrats as being too close to the
White House on the Iraq War, on Sunday called on Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld to resign but said the United States cannot "walk away" from the
Iraqis.

Lieberman, the one-time Democratic vice presidential candidate, is running
as an independent in his bid for a fourth term since losing the Democratic
nomination to newcomer Ned Lamont, who harnessed voters' anger against the
war in Iraq.

Lieberman, an early supporter of the Iraq war, said he had called for
Rumsfeld to step down in 2003.

"With all respect to Don Rumsfeld, who has done a grueling job for six
years, we would benefit from new leadership to work with our military in
Iraq," he said on CBS' "Face the Nation."

Lieberman said the Bush administration should have sent more troops into
Iraq "to secure the country."

"We had a naive vision that the Iraqis were going to embrace us and then go
on and live happily ever after," he said.

Lieberman said the administration must "put severe pressure on the Iraqis to
contain sectarian violence."

"There is still hope in Iraq and as long as there is we cannot just pick up
and walk away and leave them to the sure disaster that would follow and
would compromise our security in the war on terrorism," he said.

The Lamont campaign issued a statement Sunday criticizing Lieberman for
trying to "paint himself as courageous for clinging to the failed 'stay the
course' policy in Iraq and not listening to the voters of Connecticut on the
need to change course."

"His new found 'criticism' of the war won't convince Connecticut voters
after so many years of stubbornly rubber-stamping Bush's failed policies,"
the statement said.

The war in Iraq was the hallmark of Lamont's primary campaign. He calls for
the withdrawal of U.S. troops from what he often refers to as "a bloody
civil war," and says he believes that those who got America into the
conflict should be held accountable.

Lieberman accused Lamont of distorting his stance on Iraq.

"He made me into a cheerleader for George Bush and everything that's
happened," Lieberman said. "And the record shows that, while I believe we
did the right thing in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, I've been very critical
over the years, particularly in 2003 and 2004, about the failure to send
enough American troops to secure the country, about the absence of adequate
plans and preparation to deal with post-Saddam Iraq."

"As bad as things are now - and they've gotten worse in the last six
months - it would be a disaster if America set a deadline and said we're
getting all of our troops out by a given date," Lieberman said. "That's a
position Ned Lamont has taken."

Tom Swan, campaign manager for Lamont, said Sunday the campaign stands by
its criticism of Lieberman as being too close to President Bush.

Asked about Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who was quoted as saying that
Lieberman echoes Republicans, Lieberman said it was "just plain politics by
somebody who has ambitions of his own."

"I voted 90 percent of the time with a majority of Democrats in the U.S.
Senate," he said.

"I'm worried that my party may become what we've accused the Republicans of,
a kind of litmus-test party," he said. "If you don't agree with us 100
percent of the time, you don't agree with us. I'm devoted to the Democratic
Party."

A new Quinnipiac University poll shows Lamont is trailing Lieberman by 12
percentage points among likely voters. It said much of Lieberman's advantage
comes from his popularity among Republicans and unaffiliated voters, the
largest voting block in Connecticut.


  #2  
Old August 21st 06, 02:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Jack Linthicum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default Lieberman calls on Rumsfeld to resign


Leadfoot wrote:
One, it's a little late and the timing is a little suspicious.

Two, Joe might need a new job and he would be a leading candidate to replace
Rumsfeld

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060821/...nate_lieberman

Sen. Joe Lieberman, attacked by fellow Democrats as being too close to the
White House on the Iraq War, on Sunday called on Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld to resign but said the United States cannot "walk away" from the
Iraqis.

Lieberman, the one-time Democratic vice presidential candidate, is running
as an independent in his bid for a fourth term since losing the Democratic
nomination to newcomer Ned Lamont, who harnessed voters' anger against the
war in Iraq.

Lieberman, an early supporter of the Iraq war, said he had called for
Rumsfeld to step down in 2003.

"With all respect to Don Rumsfeld, who has done a grueling job for six
years, we would benefit from new leadership to work with our military in
Iraq," he said on CBS' "Face the Nation."

Lieberman said the Bush administration should have sent more troops into
Iraq "to secure the country."

"We had a naive vision that the Iraqis were going to embrace us and then go
on and live happily ever after," he said.

Lieberman said the administration must "put severe pressure on the Iraqis to
contain sectarian violence."

"There is still hope in Iraq and as long as there is we cannot just pick up
and walk away and leave them to the sure disaster that would follow and
would compromise our security in the war on terrorism," he said.

The Lamont campaign issued a statement Sunday criticizing Lieberman for
trying to "paint himself as courageous for clinging to the failed 'stay the
course' policy in Iraq and not listening to the voters of Connecticut on the
need to change course."

"His new found 'criticism' of the war won't convince Connecticut voters
after so many years of stubbornly rubber-stamping Bush's failed policies,"
the statement said.

The war in Iraq was the hallmark of Lamont's primary campaign. He calls for
the withdrawal of U.S. troops from what he often refers to as "a bloody
civil war," and says he believes that those who got America into the
conflict should be held accountable.

Lieberman accused Lamont of distorting his stance on Iraq.

"He made me into a cheerleader for George Bush and everything that's
happened," Lieberman said. "And the record shows that, while I believe we
did the right thing in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, I've been very critical
over the years, particularly in 2003 and 2004, about the failure to send
enough American troops to secure the country, about the absence of adequate
plans and preparation to deal with post-Saddam Iraq."

"As bad as things are now - and they've gotten worse in the last six
months - it would be a disaster if America set a deadline and said we're
getting all of our troops out by a given date," Lieberman said. "That's a
position Ned Lamont has taken."

Tom Swan, campaign manager for Lamont, said Sunday the campaign stands by
its criticism of Lieberman as being too close to President Bush.

Asked about Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who was quoted as saying that
Lieberman echoes Republicans, Lieberman said it was "just plain politics by
somebody who has ambitions of his own."

"I voted 90 percent of the time with a majority of Democrats in the U.S.
Senate," he said.

"I'm worried that my party may become what we've accused the Republicans of,
a kind of litmus-test party," he said. "If you don't agree with us 100
percent of the time, you don't agree with us. I'm devoted to the Democratic
Party."

A new Quinnipiac University poll shows Lamont is trailing Lieberman by 12
percentage points among likely voters. It said much of Lieberman's advantage
comes from his popularity among Republicans and unaffiliated voters, the
largest voting block in Connecticut.


Although Lieberman may or may not have called for Rumsfeld to step down
in 2003 in May of 2004, in the pages of the Wall Street Journal he
wrote:

"Most Democrats and Republicans, including President Bush and Sen.
Kerry, agree that we must successfully finish what we have started in
Iraq. Now is the time for all who share that goal to make our agreement
publicly clear, to stress what unites us. Many argue that we can only
rectify the wrongs done in the Iraqi prisons if Donald Rumsfeld
resigns. I disagree. Unless there is clear evidence connecting him to
the wrongdoing, it is neither sensible nor fair to force the
resignation of the secretary of defense, who clearly retains the
confidence of the commander in chief, in the midst of a war. I have yet
to see such evidence. Secretary Rumsfeld's removal would delight
foreign and domestic opponents of America's presence in Iraq. "

  #3  
Old August 21st 06, 04:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.military.naval
Louie B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Lieberman calls on Rumsfeld to resign , Now hold your Breath

And when Rummy resigns , Let go . Fool .

  #4  
Old August 23rd 06, 03:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
John P. Mullen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default Lieberman calls on Rumsfeld to resign

Jack Linthicum wrote:

Leadfoot wrote:

One, it's a little late and the timing is a little suspicious.

Two, Joe might need a new job and he would be a leading candidate to replace
Rumsfeld

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060821/...nate_lieberman

Sen. Joe Lieberman, attacked by fellow Democrats as being too close to the
White House on the Iraq War, on Sunday called on Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld to resign but said the United States cannot "walk away" from the
Iraqis.

Lieberman, the one-time Democratic vice presidential candidate, is running
as an independent in his bid for a fourth term since losing the Democratic
nomination to newcomer Ned Lamont, who harnessed voters' anger against the
war in Iraq.

Lieberman, an early supporter of the Iraq war, said he had called for
Rumsfeld to step down in 2003.

"With all respect to Don Rumsfeld, who has done a grueling job for six
years, we would benefit from new leadership to work with our military in
Iraq," he said on CBS' "Face the Nation."

Lieberman said the Bush administration should have sent more troops into
Iraq "to secure the country."

"We had a naive vision that the Iraqis were going to embrace us and then go
on and live happily ever after," he said.

Lieberman said the administration must "put severe pressure on the Iraqis to
contain sectarian violence."

"There is still hope in Iraq and as long as there is we cannot just pick up
and walk away and leave them to the sure disaster that would follow and
would compromise our security in the war on terrorism," he said.

The Lamont campaign issued a statement Sunday criticizing Lieberman for
trying to "paint himself as courageous for clinging to the failed 'stay the
course' policy in Iraq and not listening to the voters of Connecticut on the
need to change course."

"His new found 'criticism' of the war won't convince Connecticut voters
after so many years of stubbornly rubber-stamping Bush's failed policies,"
the statement said.

The war in Iraq was the hallmark of Lamont's primary campaign. He calls for
the withdrawal of U.S. troops from what he often refers to as "a bloody
civil war," and says he believes that those who got America into the
conflict should be held accountable.

Lieberman accused Lamont of distorting his stance on Iraq.

"He made me into a cheerleader for George Bush and everything that's
happened," Lieberman said. "And the record shows that, while I believe we
did the right thing in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, I've been very critical
over the years, particularly in 2003 and 2004, about the failure to send
enough American troops to secure the country, about the absence of adequate
plans and preparation to deal with post-Saddam Iraq."

"As bad as things are now - and they've gotten worse in the last six
months - it would be a disaster if America set a deadline and said we're
getting all of our troops out by a given date," Lieberman said. "That's a
position Ned Lamont has taken."

Tom Swan, campaign manager for Lamont, said Sunday the campaign stands by
its criticism of Lieberman as being too close to President Bush.

Asked about Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who was quoted as saying that
Lieberman echoes Republicans, Lieberman said it was "just plain politics by
somebody who has ambitions of his own."

"I voted 90 percent of the time with a majority of Democrats in the U.S.
Senate," he said.

"I'm worried that my party may become what we've accused the Republicans of,
a kind of litmus-test party," he said. "If you don't agree with us 100
percent of the time, you don't agree with us. I'm devoted to the Democratic
Party."

A new Quinnipiac University poll shows Lamont is trailing Lieberman by 12
percentage points among likely voters. It said much of Lieberman's advantage
comes from his popularity among Republicans and unaffiliated voters, the
largest voting block in Connecticut.



Although Lieberman may or may not have called for Rumsfeld to step down
in 2003 in May of 2004, in the pages of the Wall Street Journal he
wrote:

"Most Democrats and Republicans, including President Bush and Sen.
Kerry, agree that we must successfully finish what we have started in
Iraq. Now is the time for all who share that goal to make our agreement
publicly clear, to stress what unites us. Many argue that we can only
rectify the wrongs done in the Iraqi prisons if Donald Rumsfeld
resigns. I disagree. Unless there is clear evidence connecting him to
the wrongdoing, it is neither sensible nor fair to force the
resignation of the secretary of defense, who clearly retains the
confidence of the commander in chief, in the midst of a war. I have yet
to see such evidence. Secretary Rumsfeld's removal would delight
foreign and domestic opponents of America's presence in Iraq. "


Well, I don't see him winning.

Blaming Lamont for his website crashing is, to say the least, uncool and
not the behavior one would expect of a seasoned legislator. Last I
heard, he hasn't apologized, either.

He's not yet on the ticket. I hear his is doing OK with the signatures,
getting about 80% valid, but there is still the matter of the petition
circulaters. They must be registered voters in Connecticut. That will
be harder to check, but if he used out of state help, he probably won't
make the cut.

And, his recent public statements don't seem to be helping. According
to the article below, he has gone from leading Lamont by 10 points to a
statistical tie in just one week.

-----------------

Lieberman, Lamont Are Tied in American Research Group Survey

By Kristin Jensen

Aug. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, who's running
for re-election as an independent, is in a statistical tie with
Democratic primary winner Ned Lamont, according to a poll taken by the
American Research Group Inc. in the past five days.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...rrA&refer=home

-----------------

John Mullen
  #5  
Old August 23rd 06, 11:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Jack Linthicum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default Lieberman calls on Rumsfeld to resign


John P. Mullen wrote:
Jack Linthicum wrote:

Leadfoot wrote:

One, it's a little late and the timing is a little suspicious.

Two, Joe might need a new job and he would be a leading candidate to replace
Rumsfeld

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060821/...nate_lieberman

Sen. Joe Lieberman, attacked by fellow Democrats as being too close to the
White House on the Iraq War, on Sunday called on Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld to resign but said the United States cannot "walk away" from the
Iraqis.

Lieberman, the one-time Democratic vice presidential candidate, is running
as an independent in his bid for a fourth term since losing the Democratic
nomination to newcomer Ned Lamont, who harnessed voters' anger against the
war in Iraq.

Lieberman, an early supporter of the Iraq war, said he had called for
Rumsfeld to step down in 2003.

"With all respect to Don Rumsfeld, who has done a grueling job for six
years, we would benefit from new leadership to work with our military in
Iraq," he said on CBS' "Face the Nation."

Lieberman said the Bush administration should have sent more troops into
Iraq "to secure the country."

"We had a naive vision that the Iraqis were going to embrace us and then go
on and live happily ever after," he said.

Lieberman said the administration must "put severe pressure on the Iraqis to
contain sectarian violence."

"There is still hope in Iraq and as long as there is we cannot just pick up
and walk away and leave them to the sure disaster that would follow and
would compromise our security in the war on terrorism," he said.

The Lamont campaign issued a statement Sunday criticizing Lieberman for
trying to "paint himself as courageous for clinging to the failed 'stay the
course' policy in Iraq and not listening to the voters of Connecticut on the
need to change course."

"His new found 'criticism' of the war won't convince Connecticut voters
after so many years of stubbornly rubber-stamping Bush's failed policies,"
the statement said.

The war in Iraq was the hallmark of Lamont's primary campaign. He calls for
the withdrawal of U.S. troops from what he often refers to as "a bloody
civil war," and says he believes that those who got America into the
conflict should be held accountable.

Lieberman accused Lamont of distorting his stance on Iraq.

"He made me into a cheerleader for George Bush and everything that's
happened," Lieberman said. "And the record shows that, while I believe we
did the right thing in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, I've been very critical
over the years, particularly in 2003 and 2004, about the failure to send
enough American troops to secure the country, about the absence of adequate
plans and preparation to deal with post-Saddam Iraq."

"As bad as things are now - and they've gotten worse in the last six
months - it would be a disaster if America set a deadline and said we're
getting all of our troops out by a given date," Lieberman said. "That's a
position Ned Lamont has taken."

Tom Swan, campaign manager for Lamont, said Sunday the campaign stands by
its criticism of Lieberman as being too close to President Bush.

Asked about Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who was quoted as saying that
Lieberman echoes Republicans, Lieberman said it was "just plain politics by
somebody who has ambitions of his own."

"I voted 90 percent of the time with a majority of Democrats in the U.S.
Senate," he said.

"I'm worried that my party may become what we've accused the Republicans of,
a kind of litmus-test party," he said. "If you don't agree with us 100
percent of the time, you don't agree with us. I'm devoted to the Democratic
Party."

A new Quinnipiac University poll shows Lamont is trailing Lieberman by 12
percentage points among likely voters. It said much of Lieberman's advantage
comes from his popularity among Republicans and unaffiliated voters, the
largest voting block in Connecticut.



Although Lieberman may or may not have called for Rumsfeld to step down
in 2003 in May of 2004, in the pages of the Wall Street Journal he
wrote:

"Most Democrats and Republicans, including President Bush and Sen.
Kerry, agree that we must successfully finish what we have started in
Iraq. Now is the time for all who share that goal to make our agreement
publicly clear, to stress what unites us. Many argue that we can only
rectify the wrongs done in the Iraqi prisons if Donald Rumsfeld
resigns. I disagree. Unless there is clear evidence connecting him to
the wrongdoing, it is neither sensible nor fair to force the
resignation of the secretary of defense, who clearly retains the
confidence of the commander in chief, in the midst of a war. I have yet
to see such evidence. Secretary Rumsfeld's removal would delight
foreign and domestic opponents of America's presence in Iraq. "


Well, I don't see him winning.

Blaming Lamont for his website crashing is, to say the least, uncool and
not the behavior one would expect of a seasoned legislator. Last I
heard, he hasn't apologized, either.

He's not yet on the ticket. I hear his is doing OK with the signatures,
getting about 80% valid, but there is still the matter of the petition
circulaters. They must be registered voters in Connecticut. That will
be harder to check, but if he used out of state help, he probably won't
make the cut.

And, his recent public statements don't seem to be helping. According
to the article below, he has gone from leading Lamont by 10 points to a
statistical tie in just one week.

-----------------

Lieberman, Lamont Are Tied in American Research Group Survey

By Kristin Jensen

Aug. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, who's running
for re-election as an independent, is in a statistical tie with
Democratic primary winner Ned Lamont, according to a poll taken by the
American Research Group Inc. in the past five days.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...rrA&refer=home

-----------------

John Mullen


The site crashing is due to cronyism. They dropped a full fledged
operator using a dedicated server for some friend of a campaign manager
who wanted to help his buddy and save a few bucks.

All the polls now show the race as nearly dead-heat, 44 Liberman 42
Lamont last I saw. The poor schmuck Republican has enough baggage to
fill a 747 and still he wanders onto cable TV like he had a chance.

  #6  
Old August 23rd 06, 02:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Grey Satterfield
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Lieberman calls on Rumsfeld to resign

On 8/22/06 9:56 PM, in article , "John P. Mullen"
wrote:
Well, I don't see him winning.

Blaming Lamont for his website crashing is, to say the least, uncool and
not the behavior one would expect of a seasoned legislator. Last I
heard, he hasn't apologized, either.

He's not yet on the ticket. I hear his is doing OK with the signatures,
getting about 80% valid, but there is still the matter of the petition
circulaters. They must be registered voters in Connecticut. That will
be harder to check, but if he used out of state help, he probably won't
make the cut.

And, his recent public statements don't seem to be helping. According
to the article below, he has gone from leading Lamont by 10 points to a
statistical tie in just one week.


The issue is very much in doubt and Lieberman could certainly get beat
again, although I think his chances are better than John seems to believe
they are. It looks as if it is going to be a very close election.

Grey Satterfield

  #8  
Old August 23rd 06, 02:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Fred J. McCall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 107
Default Lieberman calls on Rumsfeld to resign

"John P. Mullen" wrote:

:Jack Linthicum wrote:
:
: Although Lieberman may or may not have called for Rumsfeld to step down
: in 2003 in May of 2004, in the pages of the Wall Street Journal he
: wrote:
:
: "Most Democrats and Republicans, including President Bush and Sen.
: Kerry, agree that we must successfully finish what we have started in
: Iraq. Now is the time for all who share that goal to make our agreement
: publicly clear, to stress what unites us. Many argue that we can only
: rectify the wrongs done in the Iraqi prisons if Donald Rumsfeld
: resigns. I disagree. Unless there is clear evidence connecting him to
: the wrongdoing, it is neither sensible nor fair to force the
: resignation of the secretary of defense, who clearly retains the
: confidence of the commander in chief, in the midst of a war. I have yet
: to see such evidence. Secretary Rumsfeld's removal would delight
: foreign and domestic opponents of America's presence in Iraq. "
:
:Well, I don't see him winning.

Of course you don't. That's because you're a knee-jerk Left Wing
Democrat, John. Reality just doesn't intrude for your sort.

:Blaming Lamont for his website crashing is, to say the least, uncool and
:not the behavior one would expect of a seasoned legislator. Last I
:heard, he hasn't apologized, either.

Last I heard, both State officials and the FBI were still
investigating. Needless to say, Lamont's website never got attacked.

:He's not yet on the ticket. I hear his is doing OK with the signatures,
:getting about 80% valid, but there is still the matter of the petition
:circulaters. They must be registered voters in Connecticut. That will
:be harder to check, but if he used out of state help, he probably won't
:make the cut.

And do you have ANY reason to believe that to be the case? Of course
not. Just more 'wishing hard'.

:And, his recent public statements don't seem to be helping. According
:to the article below, he has gone from leading Lamont by 10 points to a
:statistical tie in just one week.

Varies by poll, as always. When the typical error on such polls is
3%-5%, this isn't exactly meaningful.

But you will keep trying to 'wish hard'...

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
  #9  
Old August 23rd 06, 02:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Fred J. McCall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 107
Default Lieberman calls on Rumsfeld to resign

Grey Satterfield wrote:

:On 8/23/06 5:52 AM, in article
. com, "Jack Linthicum"
wrote:
: The [Lieberman Web] site crashing is due to cronyism. They dropped a full
: fledged operator using a dedicated server for some friend of a campaign
: manager who wanted to help his buddy and save a few bucks.
:
: All the polls now show the race as nearly dead-heat, 44 Liberman 42 Lamont
: last I saw. The poor schmuck Republican has enough baggage to fill a 747 and
: still he wanders onto cable TV like he had a chance.
:
:Interesting. If that's what happened, it certainly makes sense. Sending
ut amateurs to do the work of professionals is a recipe for disaster.

Except it's not what happened. It is, however, what the Lamont
campaign wants people to believe happened.

I'll simply note that both state officials and the FBI are still
investigating, last I heard...

--
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
soul with evil."
-- Socrates
  #10  
Old August 23rd 06, 02:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Jack Linthicum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default Lieberman calls on Rumsfeld to resign


Grey Satterfield wrote:
On 8/22/06 9:56 PM, in article , "John P. Mullen"
wrote:
Well, I don't see him winning.

Blaming Lamont for his website crashing is, to say the least, uncool and
not the behavior one would expect of a seasoned legislator. Last I
heard, he hasn't apologized, either.

He's not yet on the ticket. I hear his is doing OK with the signatures,
getting about 80% valid, but there is still the matter of the petition
circulaters. They must be registered voters in Connecticut. That will
be harder to check, but if he used out of state help, he probably won't
make the cut.

And, his recent public statements don't seem to be helping. According
to the article below, he has gone from leading Lamont by 10 points to a
statistical tie in just one week.


The issue is very much in doubt and Lieberman could certainly get beat
again, although I think his chances are better than John seems to believe
they are. It looks as if it is going to be a very close election.

Grey Satterfield


Close is the only way Joe can win, the state is 24% Republican, 33%
Democrat and 43% independent. He needs many people who don't care one
way or another about the war and his closeness to the Republicans, and
those will be hard to come by.
http://americanresearchgroup.com/ctsenate/

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 11:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 10:45 PM
Rumsfeld Must Resign WalterM140 Military Aviation 1 May 13th 04 08:24 PM
God Honest Naval Aviation 2 July 24th 03 04:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.