If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Tony Cox" wrote:
Isn't switching mental state so low to the ground a safety issue in its own right, regardless of the impact it might have on others? Yes, it's a "safety issue" in the sense that there is, as always, risk in flying. The risk can be managed, however. My description was at my limits, in perfect favorable conditions when I've got lots of recent flight practice, the wind isn't too strong, etc. One of the dangerous parts of Instrument flying is the mental switching between flying 'on instruments' and 'on visual' when shooting an ILS down to minimums. Quite a few accidents have been caused by disorientation when switching mental gears in patchy low-level clouds -- it takes people a few seconds to adjust & one has to be quite sure what you are planning to do (that is, stay 'on instruments' until you're guaranteed a continuous visual so you don't have to change gears again). I recognize this, but it's important for me to make a strong commitment to my flight status. I want the mental transition to "landing" every time before I land. If I'm trying to get away, I may decide I need to raise the gear. I may actually have lift and still have to land if I'm climbing slowly and the wind is moving me away from a position of safe access to the runway to "too far downwind." The mental switch to "landing" ensures my landing gear check, my ballast gets dumped, and I tighten my belts. I may make those checks 3-4 times if conditions are variable. I'm no glider pilot, but I'd have thought the same psychological issues might be relevant here. Is it just you that change mental state so low to the ground, or is it common practice. If you read my post closely, you'll see these mental states: 1) "I'm probably going to have to land" I'm now making sure I know the pattern, wind, traffic, etc. 2) "I'm landing." Here is where I do my checklist, dump water ballast (it takes me 3+ minutes), enter the pattern and get the gear down, etc. If I'm still trying to stay aloft, this decision is revocable, but my flight path is fixed unless lift is encountered. If I encounter lift, I decide whether I'm too low, the wind is too strong or traffic is a problem that prevents a turn. 3) "I'm not landing" I divert from my flight path by turning in lift I've decided it is safe to turn in. My gear may be retracted if things are improving significantly. I may stop dumping water. I may switch back and forth from state 3 and 2. Every entry into mental state 2 results in a complete checklst, gear check, etc. 4) "I'm irrevocably commmitted to landing" Lift encountered now is disregarded. This is a positive irrevocable decision in my mental state that differs from state 2. I have never broken and have promised myself I will never break this commitment no matter how tempted I am. It is usually entered from state 3, when things haven't gone as well as I'd hoped. I suspect that something similar is universal among XC glider pilots, with the altitude that one will switch to mental state 3 gradually decreasing with skill and experience. Like many other glider pilots ahve said to me, it seems that the moment I lower the gear, or even touch the gear handle, I hit lift. When we do, we usually can escape. You have to be ready to land, and you have to have a lower limit. As your altitude decreases, your options diminish and you are forced to approach the landing area. This forcing of your location may begin 15 to 20 miles away from an airport. A successful "save" is entirely possible long after this position forcing has begun. Not trying to be confrontational. Just interested. I don't take it as confrontational. In part I posted here to hear the view of those who have no glider experience. I want to know what they think. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Opinions please, preferred pattern joining methods | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 46 | February 7th 05 08:29 PM |
joining the traffic pattern quandary | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 77 | January 17th 05 05:07 PM |
Hickory NC Airport Flight Pattern | HBYardSale | Aerobatics | 1 | March 11th 04 02:19 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |