|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
June 8th 04, 11:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Cessna 150 vs 152
From what I've read on this NG, the Lycoming engine is a better choice in
terms of hours to Major Overhaul. A Continental engine with Millenium cylinders makes the engine less likely to fail. All things equal, including the price, what is considered a better buy, the 150 or 152? Presume they're one model year apart and equally equipped. Advice and opinions, please. Marty 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 03:40 PM |
| Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! | Bill Berle | Home Built | 73 | June 25th 04 04:53 AM |
| FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
| FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Owning | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Threaded Mode