Senate Bill S.786 could kill NWS internet weather products

It all comes down to what is less costly, the waste in government or
the
profit margin that a private enterprise would require. If the
private
enterprise is efficient enough that it can make a profit and still
cost
less than a government agency, then it is a good deal overall.


Not in the instant case. The government would still have all
the expense of operating a weather service--then a private concern
would get to sell the fruits of that tax money. E.g. Corporate
Welfare without even the meager benefits that something like a
subsidized sports stadium brings a community.

The proper and effective way to privatize services of this sort
is to put the operational support for the service up for competative
bidding by prospective contractors and NOT by privatizing the data
themselves.



You notice they don't want to maintain the 350 or so ASOS's around the
country many of which are in remote locations. I maintain about 9 of them
along with a radar computer systems river gages precip gages alert
transmitters (NWR) etc etc. They could not do this and make a profit!

Exactly. Our tax dollars will continue to fund the NWS to do the
"heavy lifting" of data acquisition and interpretation. The weather
companies would profit from this at our expense.

-Jim

New weather satellite set to launch:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science....ap/index.html

$340 Million. Maybe the good Senator from PA can convince AccuWeather
to chip in since they would be the big customers.

-Jim