A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

C-150 turbine time!!!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 16th 05, 11:38 AM
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Morgans wrote:
What do you have, then? An old airplane with enough power to pull it apart?
Hmmm.


Well, not really. The tow plane at our glider club was built in 1946 and
originally had a Gipsy inline 4 cylinder engine of 85 hp.

It now has an O-320 of 160 hp, and regularly has a glider attached to
the other end. Performance is great when the glider is not attached!

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"
  #12  
Old May 16th 05, 06:20 PM
Sport Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Dylan Smith wrote:
In article . com,

Sport Pilot wrote:
They make turbine jet engines for model airplanes now. I even

recall
someone attaching a ring gear to the impeller and making a turbo

prop
out of it. So a turbo prop C 150 would not be impossible.


Someone made a turbojet powered Cri-Cri (a single seat aircraft

normally
powered by two small two-stroke engines on small pylons off the

nose).
The cheapest twinjet time in the world!

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"


Yes, the turbojet Cri-Cri was powered by two model airplane turbines,
the largest available. I think they were over 30 lbs thrust each.

  #13  
Old May 16th 05, 11:10 PM
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Ron Natalie wrote:

There was a Turbine Luscombe or something like that kicking around
for a while.


There still is. It was built by the Luscombe Foundation here in AZ.
It's a classic example of why turbines and small low flying aircraft
are not a good mix. The 150 hp turbine burns about 16 gph in cruise.
With the Luscombe's small fuel capacity, range is pretty miserable.
The only incident I've heard of with the plane was... wait for it...
fuel starvation!

All in all, it's a very interesting exercise in design and
engineering, but as a practical mod, it's a flop.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFI without commercial? Jay Honeck Piloting 75 December 8th 10 04:17 PM
Time, running out of fuel and fuel gauges Dylan Smith Piloting 29 February 3rd 08 07:04 PM
Dumb Reg question John Gaquin Piloting 67 May 4th 05 04:54 AM
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.