A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

My New Weapon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 26th 10, 07:16 PM posted to misc.writing,alt.religion.christianity,alt.religion.kibology,rec.aviation.piloting
Gezellig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 463
Default My New Weapon

On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:10:50 -0600, Jim Logajan wrote:

Gezellig wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:57:52 -0500, Walker wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:47:29 -0500, Mark wrote:


Gezellig,

When you see a person posting under different names, such as "Walker" and
"Mark" (and god knows how many others he uses on x-privat.org) why do you
insist on replying? Do you not understand that every post from that person
are from the same account - which are easily IDed by being from x-
privat.org and have this header:


No, I was unaware.

X-Authenticated-User: $$gwx18quhxz9-wu_g$qv3bkmank

One person's inanity (or insanity) is enough.


I suppose your right, Jim, he's insane.

And I am inane for answering him.

But I guess you don't care as you set my answer to alt.null

sigh
  #12  
Old January 26th 10, 07:24 PM posted to misc.writing,alt.religion.christianity,alt.religion.kibology,rec.aviation.piloting
Gezellig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 463
Default My New Weapon

On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:10:50 -0600, Jim Logajan wrote:

One person's inanity (or insanity) is enough.


Actually I was cruel when I said Mark(ie) is insane. I think he has
Bifold Dysfunction.

Curable, good news!

http://www.hydroswing.com/Aviation.php
  #13  
Old January 26th 10, 07:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Logajan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,958
Default My New Weapon

Gezellig wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:10:50 -0600, Jim Logajan wrote:

Gezellig wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:57:52 -0500, Walker wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:47:29 -0500, Mark wrote:


Gezellig,

When you see a person posting under different names, such as "Walker"
and "Mark" (and god knows how many others he uses on x-privat.org)
why do you insist on replying? Do you not understand that every post
from that person are from the same account - which are easily IDed by
being from x- privat.org and have this header:


No, I was unaware.


And I suppose you were unaware that you added back in all the irrelevant
cross-posts to the other groups I _didn't_ include in my reply?

X-Authenticated-User: $$gwx18quhxz9-wu_g$qv3bkmank

One person's inanity (or insanity) is enough.


I suppose your right, Jim, he's insane.

And I am inane for answering him.


And inane for adding back in all those other groups, since I explicitly
replied to the only one in the list that I follow - r.a.p.

But I guess you don't care as you set my answer to alt.null

sigh


Past postings by you and $$gwx18quhxz9-wu_g$qv3bkmank clearly indicated
neither of you would be detered by changes to the followup-to header.

Anyway, thanks for helping to kick r.a.p while it's down and dying.
  #14  
Old January 26th 10, 07:44 PM posted to misc.writing,alt.religion.christianity,alt.religion.kibology,rec.aviation.piloting
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default My New Weapon

On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:33:38 -0600, Mark Edwards wrote:

[Mark and forger]

Geez, you two, get a room!

Mark Edwards


Not in my present room.

Some cute little brunette named Tammy stole her boyfriend's car and
credit cards and put me up on the 14th floor of the "Yachtsman" for a
week in Myrtle Beach, while spending thousands by day, and smoking the
sheets by night.
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
  #15  
Old January 26th 10, 08:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gezellig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 463
Default My New Weapon

On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:33:41 -0600, Jim Logajan wrote:

Gezellig wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:10:50 -0600, Jim Logajan wrote:

Gezellig wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:57:52 -0500, Walker wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:47:29 -0500, Mark wrote:

Gezellig,

When you see a person posting under different names, such as "Walker"
and "Mark" (and god knows how many others he uses on x-privat.org)
why do you insist on replying? Do you not understand that every post
from that person are from the same account - which are easily IDed by
being from x- privat.org and have this header:


No, I was unaware.


And I suppose you were unaware that you added back in all the irrelevant
cross-posts to the other groups I _didn't_ include in my reply?


No, look down the bottom, I thought you made a mistake.

X-Authenticated-User: $$gwx18quhxz9-wu_g$qv3bkmank

One person's inanity (or insanity) is enough.


I suppose your right, Jim, he's insane.

And I am inane for answering him.


And inane for adding back in all those other groups, since I explicitly
replied to the only one in the list that I follow - r.a.p.

But I guess you don't care as you set my answer to alt.null

sigh


Past postings by you and $$gwx18quhxz9-wu_g$qv3bkmank clearly indicated
neither of you would be detered by changes to the followup-to header.


How many times do you want me to admit it?

Anyway, thanks for helping to kick r.a.p while it's down and dying.


I'm sure you think by setting headers so replies fly out into nowhere,
leaving your posts as if you have the last word, I'm sure you believe
that "helps" r.a.p.

I don't.

I'm also sure when Mark(ie) came roaring into r.ap. spouting all kinds
of BS even though he isn't certificated, now lies that he is, that was
way kewl too.

You know, Jim, I'm from the school of thought that when people respond
to trolls like Mark, MxManiac, Bunyip, etc etc, who don't pilot, people
who might read that dribble.,..

*get killed*

Which leads me to believe that r.a.p is better of dead.

Oh, btw, although I appreciate your input it would have had much more
influence if *you* hadn't stuck the inital 1,000 or so daggers in r.a.p
by infighting and responding to Mx, Berie, Maxwell and on and on ad on.

  #16  
Old January 26th 10, 08:43 PM posted to misc.writing,alt.religion.christianity,alt.religion.kibology,rec.aviation.piloting
Bill Penrose[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default My New Weapon

On Jan 26, 10:39*am, Mark wrote:
Enough about me, more later of course VVBG Now for my latest answer to
ending the Afghan war.

http://tinyurl.com/yjz4zmf


If pennies are outlawed, only outlaws will have pennies.

DB



  #17  
Old January 26th 10, 08:47 PM posted to misc.writing,alt.religion.christianity,alt.religion.kibology,rec.aviation.piloting
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default My New Weapon

On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:43:13 -0800 (PST), Bill Penrose wrote:

On Jan 26, 10:39*am, Mark wrote:
Enough about me, more later of course VVBG Now for my latest answer to
ending the Afghan war.

http://tinyurl.com/yjz4zmf


If pennies are outlawed, only outlaws will have pennies.

DB


I know what it is to draw the attention of educators, and be selected
for I.Q. testing and advanced placement
--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/
  #18  
Old January 26th 10, 08:47 PM posted to misc.writing,alt.religion.christianity,alt.religion.kibology,rec.aviation.piloting
Mark Edwards
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default My New Weapon

No cluons were harmed when Bill Penrose wrote:
If pennies are outlawed, only outlaws will shop at JC Penney's.


IFYPFY.


Mark-mmmm!-cheap suits!-Edwards
--
Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

  #19  
Old January 26th 10, 11:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Logajan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,958
Default My New Weapon

Gezellig wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:33:41 -0600, Jim Logajan wrote:
Past postings by you and $$gwx18quhxz9-wu_g$qv3bkmank clearly
indicated neither of you would be detered by changes to the
followup-to header.


How many times do you want me to admit it?


My apologies. Once should have been enough - so I should have been more
gentle in my reply, but in my defense I'd say I was still irritated that
you couldn't see what seemed obvious to me. But I've been reading Usenet
for over 20 years, so may have acquired a tiny extra insight that makes
me check headers. I've also written Usenet moderation software which
perhaps provids me with a little extra insight into how to interpret
them.

Anyway, thanks for helping to kick r.a.p while it's down and dying.


I'm sure you think by setting headers so replies fly out into nowhere,
leaving your posts as if you have the last word, I'm sure you believe
that "helps" r.a.p.


Again, I apologize, since it appears I made an incorrect assumption about
the intent of your followups to x-privat.org user
X-Authenticated-User: $$gwx18quhxz9-wu_g$qv3bkmank

To be clear, my intent to reset the followup-to header was not to "get
the last word" since I hope my posting history indicates I make only
enough posts to make my meaning clear and allow others to get the "last
word," if they so choose. I simply assumed you and/or "$$gwx18quhxz9-wu_g
$qv3bkmank" were both playing at the same game and deserved to work a
little extra in any replies you made.

I don't.

I'm also sure when Mark(ie) came roaring into r.ap. spouting all kinds
of BS even though he isn't certificated, now lies that he is, that was
way kewl too.

You know, Jim, I'm from the school of thought that when people respond
to trolls like Mark, MxManiac, Bunyip, etc etc, who don't pilot,
people who might read that dribble.,..


But the person who posted as "Bertie" _is_ a pilot.
Mxsmanic originally never claimed to be a pilot (though he's posted
deliberately ambiguous messages that, by context, imply otherwise.)
I have no information on "Mark" other than he's been targeted for reasons
unknown to me by "$$gwx18quhxz9-wu_g$qv3bkmank".

*get killed*


Seems unlikely.

Oh, btw, although I appreciate your input it would have had much more
influence if *you* hadn't stuck the inital 1,000 or so daggers in
r.a.p by infighting and responding to Mx, Berie, Maxwell and on and on
ad on.


I'd be surprised if I had any influence!

I was following r.a.p back when all three of the people you mentioned
actually peacefully (relatively speaking) co-existed for awhile. None
appeared to start out as "trolls" (to this group anyway.) But in one of
Mxsmanic's posts that asked an aviation-related question, Bertie was one
of those who provided an informed and civil reply (I'd have to search
Google's archive to locate that thread if you don't believe me.)

Things went south between Mx and a lot of others when Mx tossed out a
sweeping insult of pilots on r.a.p, since he got a couple answers that
appeared to be contradictory. Like a lot of online posters, he was unable
to find the courage to post an apology.

Something similar happened with respect to "Maxwell."

I think people change only slowly and it's a good idea to learn self-
control in social interactions, so if anyone wants to discuss aviation
I'm not one to hold long grudges. And I'm not one to hold them to placate
the grudges of others.

If you think I have some failing because of that tendency, I'd suggest
that _perhaps_ you aren't living up to the meaning of the Dutch word you
appear to be using as your handle.
  #20  
Old January 26th 10, 11:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gezellig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 463
Default My New Weapon

On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:10:59 -0600, Jim Logajan wrote:

But the person who posted as "Bertie" _is_ a pilot.


IMO made it worse.

Mxsmanic originally never claimed to be a pilot (though he's posted
deliberately ambiguous messages that, by context, imply otherwise.)


Which is why he is dangerous.

I have no information on "Mark" other than he's been targeted for reasons
unknown to me by "$$gwx18quhxz9-wu_g$qv3bkmank".

*get killed*


Seems unlikely.


Perhaps but no crap info, no chance of it.

Oh, btw, although I appreciate your input it would have had much more
influence if *you* hadn't stuck the inital 1,000 or so daggers in
r.a.p by infighting and responding to Mx, Berie, Maxwell and on and on
ad on.


I'd be surprised if I had any influence!


You claimed I am part of the problem with r.ap., all I am saying, so
were/are you, I at least admit it.

I was following r.a.p back when all three of the people you mentioned
actually peacefully (relatively speaking) co-existed for awhile. None
appeared to start out as "trolls" (to this group anyway.) But in one of
Mxsmanic's posts that asked an aviation-related question, Bertie was one
of those who provided an informed and civil reply (I'd have to search
Google's archive to locate that thread if you don't believe me.)

Things went south between Mx and a lot of others when Mx tossed out a
sweeping insult of pilots on r.a.p, since he got a couple answers that
appeared to be contradictory. Like a lot of online posters, he was unable
to find the courage to post an apology.

Something similar happened with respect to "Maxwell."


Nice story, Jim, but the ridiculous threads with handsfulls of existing
and past posters here on r.a.p. for months on in were, imo, dangerous
and well supported by r.a.p. particiapnts.

Trolls don't kill newsgroups, idiots who respond to trolls do.

If you think I have some failing because of that tendency, I'd suggest
that _perhaps_ you aren't living up to the meaning of the Dutch word you
appear to be using as your handle.


I have no idea what Gezellig means, I saw it somewhere, liked the sound,
used the handle.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MASSIVE NEW CONVENTIONAL WEAPON READY: USAF's new 30,000 pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator [formerly known as Big BLU] being fitting for use on B-2 Stealth Bombers. This could be THE weapon to use against Iran's underground nuclear facilities to DE AirRaid[_4_] Naval Aviation 7 July 26th 07 11:35 PM
RAF Jaguar weapon options Dave Kearton Aviation Photos 0 March 1st 07 10:55 AM
Japanese AA Weapon? Kenneth Williams Military Aviation 18 November 7th 03 06:10 AM
Rapists and Robbers have a New Weapon Bumper7 Aerobatics 0 July 17th 03 09:37 AM
Rapists and Robbers have a New Weapon Micbloo Rotorcraft 1 July 8th 03 08:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.