FAA hurting for good help

http://www.nypost.com/seven/07142008...rol_119827.htm

LOL! The FAILED Aviation Administration is no ****ed up they
got to troll for High School kids to brainwash and force to
endure Malaysian tennis shoe factory work conditions on the
job guiding aluminum tubes full of people at 600 miles and hour

Hey white kids who work for the FAA get ready to "Kiss that
Black Ass"!!!

Alls the FAA Guvment bosses be colored you know...

Obviously since they once hired you.

Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
drive one to.


Bertie

On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Obviously since they once hired you.

Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
drive one to.

Ah !
So that's what his beef is....
And racist too.
He's an all round loser

"george" wrote in message
...
On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Obviously since they once hired you.

Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
drive one to.

Ah !
So that's what his beef is....
And racist too.
He's an all round loser

I'm sure our resident NATCA shill has a much bigger beef than most realize.

Within the FAA, I believe unions perform a very necessary and useful purpose
just as they do for other areas of professional aviation. Most NATCA
members feel the same way and are very productive employees.

Then you have those that fall into another category. You have some
controllers who really just can't hack it. Their reasons for joining the
union are a bit more nefarious. They join the union because they feel it
provides them with protection and intimidation from management who would
surely fire them if it weren't for the union (there's probably some truth
here). These types of controllers are pretty easy to identify. They wear
their NATCA membership on their sleeve. You'll find them coming back from
break early just so they can jump into the flight data position or they
might volunteer for other non operational tasks or they might just find a
good place to hide. They will do anything to keep from working airplanes,
because they know if they do it enough they will eventually screw up. Some
worm their way into full time NATCA positions. They are all perennial
complainers.

There's little doubt our resident NATCA shill falls into the second
category.

george wrote:
On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Obviously since they once hired you.

Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
drive one to.

Ah !
So that's what his beef is....
And racist too.
He's an all round loser


AND THE FAA MANAGEMENT SYCOPHANTS SPEAK

Mike wrote:
"george" wrote in message
...
On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Obviously since they once hired you.

Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
drive one to.

Ah !
So that's what his beef is....
And racist too.
He's an all round loser

I'm sure our resident NATCA shill has a much bigger beef than most realize.

Within the FAA, I believe unions perform a very necessary and useful
purpose just as they do for other areas of professional aviation. Most
NATCA members feel the same way and are very productive employees.

Then you have those that fall into another category. You have some
controllers who really just can't hack it. Their reasons for joining
the union are a bit more nefarious. They join the union because they
feel it provides them with protection and intimidation from management
who would surely fire them if it weren't for the union (there's probably
some truth here). These types of controllers are pretty easy to
identify. They wear their NATCA membership on their sleeve. You'll
find them coming back from break early just so they can jump into the
flight data position or they might volunteer for other non operational
tasks or they might just find a good place to hide. They will do
anything to keep from working airplanes, because they know if they do it
enough they will eventually screw up. Some worm their way into full
time NATCA positions. They are all perennial complainers.

There's little doubt our resident NATCA shill falls into the second
category.


The percentage of little penis FAA Managers who can't "hack"
it as a controller or technician is much greater than a few
bad controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA.

Most FAA managers are also LOSERS or STUPID so they go into
management, strap on the goose down knee pads blow a little
cock and before you know it they have risen to their level
of incompetence and inadequacy

Which one of those categories do you fit?? Mike......???

BlackHawk wrote:
Mike wrote:
"george" wrote in message
...
On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Obviously since they once hired you.

Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation
should drive one to.

Ah !
So that's what his beef is....
And racist too.
He's an all round loser

I'm sure our resident NATCA shill has a much bigger beef than most
realize. Within the FAA, I believe unions perform a very necessary and
useful
purpose just as they do for other areas of professional aviation. Most
NATCA members feel the same way and are very productive
employees. Then you have those that fall into another category. You have
some
controllers who really just can't hack it. Their reasons for joining
the union are a bit more nefarious. They join the union because they
feel it provides them with protection and intimidation from
management who would surely fire them if it weren't for the union
(there's
probably some truth here). These types of controllers are pretty
easy to identify. They wear their NATCA membership on their sleeve.
You'll
find them coming back from break early just so they can jump into the
flight data position or they might volunteer for other non
operational tasks or they might just find a good place to hide. They will
do anything to keep from working airplanes, because they know if they
do it enough they will eventually screw up. Some worm their way
into full time NATCA positions. They are all perennial complainers.

There's little doubt our resident NATCA shill falls into the second
category.


The percentage of little penis FAA Managers who can't "hack"
it as a controller or technician is much greater than a few
bad controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA.


That's not true. At any given facility there are more bad controllers who
hide behind the apron of NATCA than there are managers that can't hack it as
a controller.

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
BlackHawk wrote:
Mike wrote:
"george" wrote in message
...
On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Obviously since they once hired you.

Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation
should drive one to.
Ah !
So that's what his beef is....
And racist too.
He's an all round loser
I'm sure our resident NATCA shill has a much bigger beef than most
realize. Within the FAA, I believe unions perform a very necessary and
useful
purpose just as they do for other areas of professional aviation. Most
NATCA members feel the same way and are very productive
employees. Then you have those that fall into another category. You have
some
controllers who really just can't hack it. Their reasons for joining
the union are a bit more nefarious. They join the union because they
feel it provides them with protection and intimidation from
management who would surely fire them if it weren't for the union
(there's
probably some truth here). These types of controllers are pretty
easy to identify. They wear their NATCA membership on their sleeve.
You'll
find them coming back from break early just so they can jump into the
flight data position or they might volunteer for other non
operational tasks or they might just find a good place to hide. They will
do anything to keep from working airplanes, because they know if they
do it enough they will eventually screw up. Some worm their way
into full time NATCA positions. They are all perennial complainers.

There's little doubt our resident NATCA shill falls into the second
category.

The percentage of little penis FAA Managers who can't "hack"
it as a controller or technician is much greater than a few
bad controllers who hide behind the apron of NATCA.


That's not true. At any given facility there are more bad controllers who
hide behind the apron of NATCA than there are managers that can't hack it as
a controller.



Where is your facility? OZ?

BTW you let the cat out of the bag. It is precisely why the
FAA is so ****ed up. Why is ANY FAA manager a product of a
washed out controller, minority or golf buddy?

Don't you know the culture in the FAA falls into two
categories??

1. **** up move up or...........
2. Be a minority or demonstrate your ability to "Kiss the
Black Ass"


Since when did aviation qualifications come into play in the
FAA??

Like I said, your facility must be somewhere near OZ

On 2008-07-22, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
That's not true. At any given facility there are more bad controllers who
hide behind the apron of NATCA than there are managers that can't hack it as
a controller.

Since I've once again taken up flying, it's become obvious to me that there
are far more controllers who understand it's a cooperative effort between
controllers and pilots that keeps people safe, and who are willing to do
what they can to help folks through crowded airspace safely. There are a
bunch of really professional folks on the other side of that microphone.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)

On Jul 23, 11:34 am, BlackHawk wrote:
george wrote:
On Jul 23, 3:50 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Obviously since they once hired you.

Then of course they realised there's a limit to what desperation should
drive one to.

Ah !
So that's what his beef is....
And racist too.
He's an all round loser

AND THE FAA MANAGEMENT SYCOPHANTS SPEAK

You've got the wrong country son