If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
What is the difference between 'runway heading' and 'straight-ahead'?
"Mike Rapoport" wrote in newsXEme.3670$MI4.1787 @newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net: "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 1... Ron Rosenfeld wrote in : Good point. In other words, the aircraft should climb on runway heading to 2300', and then turn to any heading and continue climbing at 200ft/NM to the minimum IFR altitude. No you should *not* "cllimb on runway heading to 2300' ". You: 1) cross the runway end at 35' 2) climb to 400' straight ahead at 200'/nm 3) turn to any heading while continuing to climb 200'/nm, obviously you would choose your on course or clearance heading. Mike MU-2 |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
On 30 May 2005 10:59:56 -0500, Andrew Sarangan
wrote: What is the difference between 'runway heading' and 'straight-ahead'? Rwy Heading: The same compass heading as the runway orientation (i.e. no wind correction). Straight Ahead: Flying the same course as the runway orientation. Interesting that in the US we are taught that an instruction to fly runway heading means just that -- no wind correction. But in the setting of an ODP, given the manner in which the obstacles are surveyed, it would make more sense to me to fly "straight-ahead". Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 1... What is the difference between 'runway heading' and 'straight-ahead'? "Mike Rapoport" wrote in newsXEme.3670$MI4.1787 @newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net: "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 1... Ron Rosenfeld wrote in : Good point. In other words, the aircraft should climb on runway heading to 2300', and then turn to any heading and continue climbing at 200ft/NM to the minimum IFR altitude. No you should *not* "cllimb on runway heading to 2300' ". You: 1) cross the runway end at 35' 2) climb to 400' straight ahead at 200'/nm 3) turn to any heading while continuing to climb 200'/nm, obviously you would choose your on course or clearance heading. Mike MU-2 None. I was respoinding to the notion that you have to climb on runway heading or straight ahead to 2300'. You only need to maintain runway heading to 400'. Mike MU-2 |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message news "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 1... Ron Rosenfeld wrote in : Good point. In other words, the aircraft should climb on runway heading to 2300', and then turn to any heading and continue climbing at 200ft/NM to the minimum IFR altitude. No you should *not* "cllimb on runway heading to 2300' ". You: 1) cross the runway end at 35' 2) climb to 400' straight ahead at 200'/nm 3) turn to any heading while continuing to climb 200'/nm, obviously you would choose your on course or clearance heading. Are'nt we still talking about KIDI runway 10 departure? The one that says: "DEPARTURE PROCEDU Rwy 10, climb runway heading to 2300 before proceeding on course." ? |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
"John Clonts" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message news "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 1... Ron Rosenfeld wrote in : Good point. In other words, the aircraft should climb on runway heading to 2300', and then turn to any heading and continue climbing at 200ft/NM to the minimum IFR altitude. No you should *not* "cllimb on runway heading to 2300' ". You: 1) cross the runway end at 35' 2) climb to 400' straight ahead at 200'/nm 3) turn to any heading while continuing to climb 200'/nm, obviously you would choose your on course or clearance heading. Are'nt we still talking about KIDI runway 10 departure? The one that says: "DEPARTURE PROCEDU Rwy 10, climb runway heading to 2300 before proceeding on course." ? Argh! You're right! For some reason I thought that we were talking about diverse departures in general. Mike |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Rapoport wrote: "John Clonts" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message news "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 1... Ron Rosenfeld wrote in : Good point. In other words, the aircraft should climb on runway heading to 2300', and then turn to any heading and continue climbing at 200ft/NM to the minimum IFR altitude. No you should *not* "cllimb on runway heading to 2300' ". You: 1) cross the runway end at 35' 2) climb to 400' straight ahead at 200'/nm 3) turn to any heading while continuing to climb 200'/nm, obviously you would choose your on course or clearance heading. Are'nt we still talking about KIDI runway 10 departure? The one that says: "DEPARTURE PROCEDU Rwy 10, climb runway heading to 2300 before proceeding on course." ? Argh! You're right! For some reason I thought that we were talking about diverse departures in general. Mike That runway is a modified or restricted diverse departure because it has an instruction as opposed to a full departure route. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Iowa City Airport in the News | John Galban | Piloting | 40 | April 17th 05 03:41 AM |
Iowa City Airport in the News | Dave S | Piloting | 0 | April 6th 05 10:24 PM |
SWRFI update... Moving again (argghh!!)... | Dave S | Home Built | 14 | October 15th 04 03:34 AM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Owning | 24 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 18 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |