If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:36:38 -0000, "Chris" wrote in :: More efficient in fuel-per-passenger-mile? Doubtful. Try driving a car across an ocean or mountain range and I think the airplane comes out more fuel efficient. Given the A380 is overweight, over budget and yet to fly, It's difficult to know the truth on this issue. But that doesn't prevent its makers from hailing it as a major European feat that will reshape aviation. Let's discuss it further after it has actually flown. It was at some stage 2 percent overweight. Airbus claims that this problems has been solved. If you really want to doubt then doubt Boeing's claims on the 7E7. They seem so desperate now that they will be happy to promise almost everything. Nik |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:32:22 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:36:38 -0000, "Chris" wrote in :: More efficient in fuel-per-passenger-mile? Doubtful. Try driving a car across an ocean or mountain range and I think the airplane comes out more fuel efficient. Given the A380 is overweight, Underweight actually. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...c&refer=europe over budget By what %? How does that compare with other similar projects? --==++AJC++==-- |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Larry,
Given the A380 is overweight, over budget and yet to fly, It's difficult to know the truth on this issue. But that doesn't prevent its makers from hailing it as a major European feat that will reshape aviation. Let's discuss it further after it has actually flown. Come on, Larry, you know better than that. There is no doubt the thing will fly. Also, at this stage in the project, there is no doubt it will sell (actually, something like 160 are sold) and be within weight and budget limits. This is not some Boeing "project" aka pipedream where the boss holds up a tiny model to the press. The plane is a month or two from first flight. It is also not a company like Eclipse. These guys mean business - and you only have to compare their sales numbers to that of Boeing to see that they know what they are doing. Don't fall for the Boeing propaganda... -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Larry, Given the A380 is overweight, over budget and yet to fly, It's difficult to know the truth on this issue. But that doesn't prevent its makers from hailing it as a major European feat that will reshape aviation. Let's discuss it further after it has actually flown. Come on, Larry, you know better than that. There is no doubt the thing will fly. Also, at this stage in the project, there is no doubt it will sell (actually, something like 160 are sold) and be within weight and budget limits. This is not some Boeing "project" aka pipedream where the boss holds up a tiny model to the press. The plane is a month or two from first flight. It is also not a company like Eclipse. These guys mean business - and you only have to compare their sales numbers to that of Boeing to see that they know what they are doing. Don't fall for the Boeing propaganda... -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) Inclusive of options the A380 is beyond the 250 mark. Of cause all options might not be exercised. But chances are that at least a good deal of them will if the thing offer what has been promised. Nik |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Come on, Larry, you know better than that. There is no doubt the thing
will fly. Also, at this stage in the project, there is no doubt it will sell (actually, something like 160 are sold) and be within weight and budget limits. This is not some Boeing "project" aka pipedream where the boss holds up a tiny model to the press. The plane is a month or two from first flight. It is also not a company like Eclipse. These guys mean business - and you only have to compare their sales numbers to that of Boeing to see that they know what they are doing. It will be interesting to see what Airbus does with the A380's rudder/vertical stabilizer design. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Larry Dighera
says... On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:36:38 -0000, "Chris" wrote in :: More efficient in fuel-per-passenger-mile? Doubtful. Try driving a car across an ocean or mountain range and I think the airplane comes out more fuel efficient. Given the A380 is overweight, over budget and yet to fly, It's difficult to know the truth on this issue. But that doesn't prevent its makers from hailing it as a major European feat that will reshape aviation. Let's discuss it further after it has actually flown. With computers the way they are nowadays, I wouldn't worry too much about how closely actual performance will match predicted. Airbus has demonstrated a solid capacity to build on previous models in ever- increasing sizes, and the only thing that's at all radical about the A380 is its size. Given that it's bigger than the 747 by a sizable margin, I'd say that reshaping long haul commercial aviation is a given. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Morgans" wrote in message ... "Peter" wrote The A380 doesn't need 110 pilots to carry 440 passengers. Huge manpower savings. True, but it does need more pilots than 110 passenger cars do. How do you work that out? Two pilots versus 110 drivers - the plane clearly has the edge in manpower efficiency. That is really twisted thinking. Normally, in a car, one of the passengers is posing as the (pilot)driver. Therefore, airbus loses. Airbus - two people that went somewhere, only because they had to, vs car - no person went somewhere they did not have to. Well, two people (pilot and co-pilot) plus about thirty flight attendants in the back |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Jay,
It will be interesting to see what Airbus does with the A380's rudder/vertical stabilizer design. Why? A friend of mine heads the production design group, so I could ask. but I guess you are hinting at the Queens, NY crash. Well, the A380 will do exactly the same if you press the pedals left and right way in rapid succession. So will any Boeing passenger jet. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
sell (actually, something like 160 are sold) Actually, 149 as of today, including the UPS deal. The Airbus goal was to sell 150 by mid-2005. I'd bet on them selling one piece in five months - any deals? :-)) Patrick |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
On 19/01/2005, Thomas Borchert wrote:
It will be interesting to see what Airbus does with the A380's rudder/vertical stabilizer design. Why? A friend of mine heads the production design group, so I could ask. but I guess you are hinting at the Queens, NY crash. Well, the A380 will do exactly the same if you press the pedals left and right way in rapid succession. So will any Boeing passenger jet. I was under the impression that in newer FBY aircraft the software wouldn't allow the pilot to break the rudder or the vertical stabiliser off. -- Simon Elliott http://www.ctsn.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force conducts live test of MOAB | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 21st 03 10:45 PM |