If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Can anyone explain what TFR's are supposed to do?
I haven't figured out why TFR's exist. How are they supposed to
protect the President and/or whatever else? Does the Secret Service and the FAA really think that just having a "no flight activity" within an imaginary circle sixty miles across will really stop a determined assailant? Besides, light airplanes just don't have the hitting power to cause much of a problem for anything but a "soft" target, and any soft target would be so small as to be an immensely hard target to hit, not to mention how difficult it would be to be at the right place and time to actually have a shot at hitting it while it's in the open. I mean come'on, once the president's airplane is on the ground, he's off and rolling on a schedule that has him moving constantly. Talk about a moving target! And then when he stops, it's often inside a big building. Those times he might be scheduled for an outdoor address, I can see the Secret Service getting a bit uptight about that and not wanting stray airplanes around at that point, but how often does that happen? Are the airliners prevented from flying within the TFR? If not, can someone explain why not? It wasn't a lightplane that caused the collaps of the WTC. Is the TFR anything but a panacea for the Secret Service? Something they can point to as proof that they take their job seriously? Sort of reminds me of that old joke about a guy walking down the street who spots another guy jumping up and down and waving a bag above his head. The first guy stops and asks whats going on. The second guy says he's scaring elephants away. "There aren't any elephants around here." The first guy says. "Pretty effective isn't it?" The second guy responds. Corky Scott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Giving the gub'mit every benefit of the doubt, although without any evidence
that anyone currently in the administration could find their ass with both hands, I think the idea is to reduce the number of radar targets they would need to deal with if someone did attempt an aerial attack. Our GA planes themselves are not the threat, they would just provide cover for one. Being realistic, it's just more mindless knee jerking to make the uniformed public feel better. -- Roger Long |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The TFRs are supposed to prevent an unspecified attack on the President of
the United States by unspecified persons. While it is true that the TFRs are probably ineffective and they are discriminatory, it is not true that general aviation airplanes pose no threat or that their threat is less than that of ground vehicles. A small airplane can approach a target at speeds in excess of 200 mph and drop a bomb or detonate itself with little warning. The fact that the same mission could be accomplished by other means, such as a truck full of explosives, is irrelevant. It is possible that the means of attack is more important to the attacker than the effectiveness of the attack -- the whole "terror from the skies" thing. Small airplanes flown by the Civil Air Patrol carried bombs and were effective during WW II in patrolling against submarines and even managed to sink one. As Lee Harvey Oswald demonstrated, there is no way to protect the President or anyone else against a determined and possibly suicidal attacker. There will always be people who are willing to take great risks to get close to the President, although no one has made a serious attempt since Gerald Ford. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Corky Scott" wrote in message ... I haven't figured out why TFR's exist. How are they supposed to protect the President and/or whatever else? That's the general principle. Does the Secret Service and the FAA really think that just having a "no flight activity" within an imaginary circle sixty miles across will really stop a determined assailant? The FAA ain't running the circus. I suspect that the Secret Service feels that by keeping all (or at least) most friendly traffic out of the area, it makes it easier to spot the unfriendlies. The TFR's used to follow the president around for certain appearances but they were MUCH smaller than the recent oens. Are the airliners prevented from flying within the TFR? If not, can someone explain why not? It wasn't a lightplane that caused the collaps of the WTC. The argument (laughable) is that air carriers have gone through a more rigorous security procedure and aren't a problem. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ... As Lee Harvey Oswald demonstrated, there is no way to protect the President or anyone else against a determined and possibly suicidal attacker. There will always be people who are willing to take great risks to get close to the President, although no one has made a serious attempt since Gerald Ford. Excuse me? Hinkley managed to get a bullet into Ronald Reagan and turned James Brady into a candidate for national vegetable. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Ron Natalie wrote: The FAA ain't running the circus. I suspect that the Secret Service feels that by keeping all (or at least) most friendly traffic out of the area, it makes it easier to spot the unfriendlies. And notice when they're serious about it the TFR is 60 miles across. Really makes you wonder what the point of a 6 mile wide TFR is. I can cross from the edge of that to the center in 1 minute. Then what? It's stupid, but I'd hate to generate so much discussion about it that they "solve" the problem by widening the TFRs. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
As Lee Harvey Oswald demonstrated, there is no way to protect the
President or anyone else against a determined and possibly suicidal attacker. There will always be people who are willing to take great risks to get close to the President, although no one has made a serious attempt since Gerald Ford. Which president did Gerald Ford attempt to kill (besides himself, of course)? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
It makes the American public and media feel good that something is being
done. The other benefit is that the TFR tells everyone where the President every minute. (Oh, unless they put one up for mis information) Corky Scott wrote: I haven't figured out why TFR's exist. How are they supposed to protect the President and/or whatever else? Does the Secret Service and the FAA really think that just having a "no flight activity" within an imaginary circle sixty miles across will really stop a determined assailant? Besides, light airplanes just don't have the hitting power to cause much of a problem for anything but a "soft" target, and any soft target would be so small as to be an immensely hard target to hit, not to mention how difficult it would be to be at the right place and time to actually have a shot at hitting it while it's in the open. I mean come'on, once the president's airplane is on the ground, he's off and rolling on a schedule that has him moving constantly. Talk about a moving target! And then when he stops, it's often inside a big building. Those times he might be scheduled for an outdoor address, I can see the Secret Service getting a bit uptight about that and not wanting stray airplanes around at that point, but how often does that happen? Are the airliners prevented from flying within the TFR? If not, can someone explain why not? It wasn't a lightplane that caused the collaps of the WTC. Is the TFR anything but a panacea for the Secret Service? Something they can point to as proof that they take their job seriously? Sort of reminds me of that old joke about a guy walking down the street who spots another guy jumping up and down and waving a bag above his head. The first guy stops and asks whats going on. The second guy says he's scaring elephants away. "There aren't any elephants around here." The first guy says. "Pretty effective isn't it?" The second guy responds. Corky Scott |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Corky Scott" wrote in message ... I haven't figured out why TFR's exist. How are they supposed to protect the President and/or whatever else? Most of them have nothing to do with the President. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Ross Richardson" wrote in message ... It makes the American public and media feel good that something is being done. The other benefit is that the TFR tells everyone where the President every minute. (Oh, unless they put one up for mis information) The American public doesn't know the TFR's exist. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An odd clearance...can anyone explain? | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 32 | September 18th 04 09:35 PM |
Puget Sound TFRs reduced in size - charted here | David H | Owning | 3 | January 10th 04 06:01 AM |
wasn't Toyots supposed to come out with a plane a few years ago? | James | Home Built | 2 | December 22nd 03 05:45 AM |
TEC, can anyone use small words and explain this to me? | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | November 16th 03 05:51 PM |
Please explain | T3 | Military Aviation | 28 | November 14th 03 11:11 PM |