If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:39:30 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote: The myth that 21.302 (b)(2) has been rescinded, which it ain't. Jim "Javier Henderson" wrote in message ... Jon A. writes: Who said that? Are you speaking of the legendary owner manufactured parts myth that has been repeated so many times that folks are proving it to be true? What myth is this? -jav No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on his own. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
An owner produced part is not airworthy unless it matches the blueprints the
manufacturer supplied to the FAA when the aircraft was certificated. Or a 337 with and STC is used. Or a field approval is obtained. "Jon A." wrote in message news On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:39:30 -0800, "RST Engineering" wrote: The myth that 21.302 (b)(2) has been rescinded, which it ain't. Jim "Javier Henderson" wrote in message ... Jon A. writes: Who said that? Are you speaking of the legendary owner manufactured parts myth that has been repeated so many times that folks are proving it to be true? What myth is this? -jav No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on his own. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
That doesn't HAPPEN to be true, but I'll let you deal with your FSDO any way
you want. Nobody ever said that "willy nilly" (whatever the hell that means) was an option. You spend a deuce of a lot of time as an apprentice learning what looks like airplane and what doesn't. Jim "Dan Thompson" wrote in message . com... An owner produced part is not airworthy unless it matches the blueprints the manufacturer supplied to the FAA when the aircraft was certificated. Or a 337 with and STC is used. Or a field approval is obtained. No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on his own. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Carl Ellis wrote:
Draw your own conclusions. http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/news/arch...2002/Parts.htm You can draw lots of conclusions from this, but you can't draw a conclusion that allowing owner produced parts is bad ... which is clearly the intent of your post. An improperly made part is bad, but a properly made part would have been just fine. Matt |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:25:21 -0500, Matt Whiting wrote:
You can draw lots of conclusions from this, but you can't draw a conclusion that allowing owner produced parts is bad ... which is clearly the intent of your post. An improperly made part is bad, but a properly made part would have been just fine. Matt No, that is not the intent of my post. I just provided the article for other to see what the FAA has to say about this. In fact, I am in the process of making an owner manufactured part of my own following the guidelines in the article. Owner produced parts are a good thing for those of us with orphaned aircraft. You just need to be aware of the requirements for it to be legal. - Carl - |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Carl Ellis wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:25:21 -0500, Matt Whiting wrote: You can draw lots of conclusions from this, but you can't draw a conclusion that allowing owner produced parts is bad ... which is clearly the intent of your post. An improperly made part is bad, but a properly made part would have been just fine. Matt No, that is not the intent of my post. I just provided the article for other to see what the FAA has to say about this. Ok, good. In fact, I am in the process of making an owner manufactured part of my own following the guidelines in the article. Owner produced parts are a good thing for those of us with orphaned aircraft. You just need to be aware of the requirements for it to be legal. Yes, and even more important, for it to be safe. Matt |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:10:47 GMT, "Dan Thompson"
wrote: An owner produced part is not airworthy unless it matches the blueprints the manufacturer supplied to the FAA when the aircraft was certificated. Or a 337 with and STC is used. Or a field approval is obtained. Holy Crap! Someone else that reads the entire passage, not just what they want to see! Hope you have your armor on. The pseudo lawyers are going to get you! "Jon A." wrote in message news On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:39:30 -0800, "RST Engineering" wrote: The myth that 21.302 (b)(2) has been rescinded, which it ain't. Jim "Javier Henderson" wrote in message ... Jon A. writes: Who said that? Are you speaking of the legendary owner manufactured parts myth that has been repeated so many times that folks are proving it to be true? What myth is this? -jav No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on his own. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:58:15 -0800, "RST Engineering"
wrote: That doesn't HAPPEN to be true, but I'll let you deal with your FSDO any way you want. Nobody ever said that "willy nilly" (whatever the hell that means) was an option. You spend a deuce of a lot of time as an apprentice learning what looks like airplane and what doesn't. Jim And you spend more time justifying doing something that isn't right. Gotta go, I'm curing some rubber for my airplane tires and it'll go bad if I don't get right on it! "Dan Thompson" wrote in message .com... An owner produced part is not airworthy unless it matches the blueprints the manufacturer supplied to the FAA when the aircraft was certificated. Or a 337 with and STC is used. Or a field approval is obtained. No, the myth that an owner could just willy nilly make up a part on his own. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Geezus! What's this group coming to? Pretty soon it;ll turn out to
be a good and accurate source of info! On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:13:40 -0800, Carl Ellis wrote: Draw your own conclusions. http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/news/arch...2002/Parts.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
molding plexiglas websites? | [email protected] | Home Built | 13 | February 6th 05 09:26 PM |
Would you like to write about your hobby for one of the UK's top websites? | Steve Roche | Home Built | 0 | February 13th 04 10:36 AM |
Zenith Ch 701 Builder's info and websites?? | DL152279546231 | Home Built | 1 | February 10th 04 08:21 PM |
homebuilder websites updated daily? | Joa | Home Built | 6 | December 28th 03 07:30 PM |