If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!):
Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!):
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0...ic.php?t=53409 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!):
Ed Rasimus wrote:
On 29 May 2006 15:14:30 -0700, wrote: Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!): http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0...ic.php?t=53409 Rangel has done this before--about three years ago. At that time the bill went nowhere until just before the presidential election at which time it was defeated something like 425 to 5. Rangel didn't vote for his own bill. If you won't "cowerfromthetruth" you should note that Rangel is a Democrat, exceptionally liberal (bordering on socialist), from a heavily minority district in Detroit and adamantly against the administration. A draft bill is totally ludicrous. Conscripts don't have the retainability or the necessary skills for the configuration of the current US military establishment. If you've watched operations recently you might have noted that we no longer depend upon massed forces marching in lock-step across the plains of Waterloo. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com Ed, Rep. Charlie Rangel actually represents New York's 15th Congressional district. The district covers Upper Manhattan and parts of the Bronx. The district also includes Rikers Island, make of that what you will. ALV |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!):
Ed Rasimus wrote:
A draft bill is totally ludicrous. Conscripts don't have the retainability or the necessary skills for the configuration of the current US military establishment. If you've watched operations recently you might have noted that we no longer depend upon massed forces marching in lock-step across the plains of Waterloo. Who says conscription has to be non-selective? There's already something of a seperate draft for medical personel. If a general draft were implemented again, why could it not be set up to cherry pick only those with the skills / general education / maturity the military thinks they can work with. IMHO a draft is a bad idea because getting into situation that would require it are bad ideas. But I don't see why one could not be workable, if it were designed around the same personel needs that the military is currently struggling to find voluneteer applications for. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!):
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!):
Ian MacLure wrote:
wrote in Who says conscription has to be non-selective? There's already something of a seperate draft for medical personel. Huh? Please explain. There are no draftees in service. Sorry, I should have been more specific. There is already the structure of a seperate, targeted program in existence, but it has not been "turned on". "The Health Care Personnel Delivery System (HCPDS) is a standby plan developed for the Selective Service System at the request of Congress. If needed it would be used to draft health care personnel in a crisis. It is designed to be implemented in connection with a national mobilization in an emergency, and then only if Congress and the President approve the plan and pass and sign legislation to enact it." The point is not that it's not active, but that the idea of having a targeted draft program has already been developed. If it can be done for one job need, it can be done for another. If a general draft were implemented again, why could it not be set up to cherry pick only those with the skills / general education / maturity the military thinks they can work with. We don't have any need for a levee en masse on the scale of WWII or even Korea. The phrase "cherry pick" implies going through a large pool of candidates to find the small fraction who have what you need. In short, don't lower the standards for enlistment, but actually raise them a lot, then virtually march everyone through the recruiting office and keep the phone numbers of the small fraction who meet your standards. Everyone assumes a draftee army would be composed of high school dropouts, but there's no reason the process could not be structured to produce a smaller army composed exclusively of scholar athletes, or whoever the generals think would be the best recruits. IMHO a draft is a bad idea because getting into situation that would require it are bad ideas. Sometimes its not our call. Perhaps, but the current administation is not exactly known for creative thinking when it comes to seeking alternatives. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!):
In article .com,
wrote: Ian MacLure wrote: wrote in Who says conscription has to be non-selective? There's already something of a seperate draft for medical personel. Huh? Please explain. There are no draftees in service. Sorry, I should have been more specific. There is already the structure of a seperate, targeted program in existence, but it has not been "turned on". "The Health Care Personnel Delivery System (HCPDS) is a standby plan developed for the Selective Service System at the request of Congress. If needed it would be used to draft health care personnel in a crisis. It is designed to be implemented in connection with a national mobilization in an emergency, and then only if Congress and the President approve the plan and pass and sign legislation to enact it." Sort of like registering for Selective Service when there is no draft. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!):
"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... On 29 May 2006 15:14:30 -0700, wrote: Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!): http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0...ic.php?t=53409 Rangel has done this before--about three years ago. At that time the bill went nowhere until just before the presidential election at which time it was defeated something like 425 to 5. Rangel didn't vote for his own bill. If you won't "cowerfromthetruth" you should note that Rangel is a Democrat, exceptionally liberal (bordering on socialist), from a heavily minority district in Detroit and adamantly against the administration. A draft bill is totally ludicrous. Last time I checked our military was stretched extremely thin. Whicha has allowed the Iranian version of Hitler to thumbs his nose at us while he acquires nukes. And making the assumption that military action (if required) against Iran can be limited to airstrikes is ludicrous. Conscripts don't have the retainability or the necessary skills for the configuration of the current US military establishment. That depends on who and how long you draft them for. Although it might be quite possible to add some division the old fashioned way... with volunteers. If you've watched operations recently you might have noted that we no longer depend upon massed forces marching in lock-step across the plains of Waterloo. One of the worst mistakes we can make is to assume that we will fight future wars like the last one. In the case of Iraq they were weakened by a previous war, had an arms embargo and were studied in minute detail for the twelve years before we invaded. If we are really lucky the next major war will be fought after the next Presidential election. The present fools have show themselves to be completely incompetent. BTW Have you read Cobra II yet? Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!):
The point of these commie-libs introducing and advocating conscription isn't
to get more sodliers for the military. The point of it all is to get more people mad at "the man." Ed is right, there is zero potential for these half-hearted attempts to accomplish conscription. It's the commie-libs version of "you're either with us or your're with [the administration]." You have to wonder when the same people that alaways want to cut funding for DoD suddenly want to hang some millstone around the neck of DoD, if these people do actually want us to win against the terrorist. Scott "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... On 29 May 2006 15:14:30 -0700, wrote: Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!): http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0...ic.php?t=53409 Rangel has done this before--about three years ago. At that time the bill went nowhere until just before the presidential election at which time it was defeated something like 425 to 5. Rangel didn't vote for his own bill. If you won't "cowerfromthetruth" you should note that Rangel is a Democrat, exceptionally liberal (bordering on socialist), from a heavily minority district in Detroit and adamantly against the administration. A draft bill is totally ludicrous. Conscripts don't have the retainability or the necessary skills for the configuration of the current US military establishment. If you've watched operations recently you might have noted that we no longer depend upon massed forces marching in lock-step across the plains of Waterloo. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Rep Rangel introduces Draft Bill (for Iran?!):
On Mon, 29 May 2006 22:26:15 GMT, Ed Rasimus
wrote: If you won't "cowerfromthetruth" you should note that Rangel is a Democrat, exceptionally liberal (bordering on socialist), from a heavily minority district in Detroit and adamantly against the administration. A draft bill is totally ludicrous Well, not from Rangel's point of view. The intent is to keep up the fear factor among university students. Perhaps your institution is different, but the local campus believes with the fervor of the newly converted that the Bush administration is about to institute the draft the minute they divert their eyes. Another fervent belief, though perhaps not so widespread, is that soldiers are being stationed on the borders so that, when the time comes, they can turn their rifles in the other direction and complete the fascist takeover. To judge from reading the student newspaper, as I do from month to month, is to wonder anew at the gullibility of the young, and their lack of any historical sense. You regularly read about how wars are always started by Republican presidents (presumably including WWI, WWII, Korean, and Vietnam, to name the major American military conflicts of the 20th century). -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another letter against the proposed bill | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 0 | September 15th 04 04:34 AM |
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 428 | July 1st 04 11:16 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Concorde Finally Goes Bust!!! | Larry Fransson | General Aviation | 10 | November 11th 03 05:03 AM |