If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"Roger" wrote in message
news I've had the Deb stall in level flight at 5500 feet on a beautiful clear day. Do you have any theories about what caused that one? I gather you were not practicing stalls or slow flight? -- Will westes AT earthbroadcast.com |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Dylan Smith wrote in message ...
In article , CHANGE USERNAME TO westes wrote: How do you use prop on a single engine plane to improve alignment to the runway? Rudder and ailerons I understand. And on a dual engine airplane I In a tractor configured (i.e. engine and prop on the nose, single fin directly in line with the fuselage and in the propwash) single engine plane, at low speeds the propwash over the tail surfaces make the rudder much more effective if you give the engine some power. Bingo. -cwk. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:57:14 -0800, "CHANGE USERNAME TO westes"
wrote: "Roger" wrote in message news I've had the Deb stall in level flight at 5500 feet on a beautiful clear day. Do you have any theories about what caused that one? I gather you were not practicing stalls or slow flight? Clear air turbulence. It could have been wake turbulence but there were no reported aircraft in the area. It had been a smooth ride. I hit a pretty hard bump, followed by another with in a few seconds. I brought the power back and slowed to Va. I hit another still harder bump. The next one left me looking at the ground, but at 140MPH plus the nose came right back up. I don't think the altitude changed a 100 feet. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 03:30:09 GMT, "C Kingsbury"
wrote: "BTIZ" wrote in message news:VSwod.131876$bk1.3469@fed1read05... and what is the published max demonstrated crosswind ?? less than 20knts in my guess.. I've landed my 172 in 30 knot crosswinds, as in 25g40 knot winds perpendicular to the runway. Sure as hell not with more than one notch down, though. Fun ride it was. The number in the book is for a plane at gross weight with the engine at idle. It's the number at which the rudder runs out of effectiveness to keep the nose aligned with the runway. So you blow it over with the prop. Of I sure hope your instructor didn't come up with that. It has absolutely nothing to do with the planes real capabilities. The figure in the book has only one meaning. It was the wind on the day the cross wind landing capability was tested and has very little to do with what the plane can actually do in stronger wings. My Deb has a 12 knot demonstrated cross wind component. I've taken off and landed a the cross wind component of 25. course if it's a short field and you're near gross, then you're going to be a lot closer to what the book says. But a 15-kt crosswind is nothing for a lightly-loaded plane as long as the pilot knows what he's doing. It depends on the airplane. If the slip to land is used you know if you have enough aileron and rudder to keep the plane tracking and aligned with the runway. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com -cwk. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:02:35 -0800, "BTIZ"
wrote: and what is the published max demonstrated crosswind ?? less than 20knts in my guess.. Which has nothing to do with real life. but I agree.. 40 degree flaps in a cross wind is not a good idea.. even less so for a Cessna I would agree for a gusty cross wind, but not a steady wind. OTOH it does depend on the airplane. I always used full flaps in the Cherokee. Never found a reason not to and I flew in a lot of windy conditions. Then again I've landed a 150 in some very strong cross winds and I used full flaps. However which every configuration you choose, work up to it. Just because some one else does it doesn't mean you can use any particular configuration in wind conditions you haven't experienced before. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com snip |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"BTIZ" wrote in message news:VSwod.131876$bk1.3469@fed1read05... and what is the published max demonstrated crosswind ?? less than 20knts in my guess.. It also depends on how you're loaded. As the CG moves back the rudder is working off a shorter arm in trying to pivot the airplane straight. With a more forward CG it's effectiveness will stay to a lower airspeed. The real bottom line is whether or not you can keep the nose straight with the amount of aileron needed to stay over the centerline. The max demonstrated number is a good guideline for your average pilot. For those that fly in areas of the country with high winds a lot of the time they get a little more skilled at handling the xw. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Aviation accidents alarming Marines | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 11th 04 08:35 PM |
Aviation accidents alarming Marines | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 11th 04 08:35 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |