If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you think you've seen it all...
Morgans wrote:
You have one labeled P-38 starting as a Corsair taxies by. I thought, why is the P-38 starting both engines at the same time? I have never seen a twin do that; must be hell on a battery. Then I noticed that the Corsair going by has his prop turning at about the same speed as the P-38. That is odd. His engine must be running, as nobody is towing him. Then it occurred to me. The camera must have had a very fast shutter, and what appeared as the twin starting, is also happening to the Corsair prop; they are both running at idle, and the camera is nearly stopping the prop, but rapidly enough that it looks as they are turning slowly. When Jay first put that video up, there was extensive discussion about the fact that the Lightning's engines appear to be turning in the same direction, while it's known that they didn't. I think you've found the reason. It's possible that the period in which the Lightning's props seem to be stopped is actually a period in which they were in perfect synch with the camera. I don't remember if anyone else proposed your theory during that thread. Someone might have. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you think you've seen it all...
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:PZhBf.721145$x96.655433@attbi_s72... You might want to re-label that video. g Yeah, that's what happens when you take low-res video with a Canon digital camera. The shutter speed is actually too SLOW, not too fast, and it messes with the prop rotation. Nah. A slow shutter speed would result in enough blur to make the motion obvious. The real issue is frame rate, when it comes to the apparent motion of the prop. I didn't look at the videos in question, but NTSC is 30 frames per sec (okay, technically it is 29.97). If the prop rotation is the right multiple of that (in blades per second), the prop will look stopped, regardless of shutter speed. The camera is actually taking 60 shots per second, since each frame has an odd field and an even field. So as far as shutter speed goes, the slowest the shutter speed can be is 1/60th of a second for the above-mentioned NTSC. That would be slow enough to get some blur in there. But that would probably overexpose most outdoor shots, even at an f-stop of 22, unless you also have a filter to cut the light some. In good light, the shutter speed could be 1/250th of a second or even faster, which would freeze the prop without much blur at all. So, to sum up: any frame rate can be a problem, depending on the actual rotation speed of the prop. Slower shutter speeds can help, by blurring the image of the prop a bit, but it won't change whether the individual prop blades appear stationary or not. However, the photographer usually would need to take special steps to ensure a slow enough shutter speed; the default autoexposure on a typical consumer video camera probably won't be slow enough. Pete |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you think you've seen it all...
Recently, Jay Honeck posted:
For those who might be feeling a bit jaded, or as if they've "seen it all before", I submit: http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photoga...d-bat-suit.wmv Ay yi yi! Kinda puts a different spin on "sport pilot", doesn't it? Neil |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you think you've seen it all...
Can we all agree that this video (P38 Start Up) isn't CGI? g
The Monk |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Just when you think you've seen it all...
Yeah, that's what happens when you take low-res video with a Canon digital
camera. The shutter speed is actually too SLOW, not too fast, and it messes with the prop rotation. That's an interesting effect. What still confuses me is that the guy to the right of the Corsair appears to be walking at a normal pace - that is, the image seems smooth enough and not visibly erratic or jumpy. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
OT - Just when you think you've seen it all...
"George Patterson" wrote in message news:n2iBf.31300$RK3.891@trnddc06... When Jay first put that video up, there was extensive discussion about the fact that the Lightning's engines appear to be turning in the same direction, while it's known that they didn't. George Patterson Actually, the USA sold the P-322 Lightning I (looks a lot like a P-38) to Great Britain where both props turned the same way... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|