A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is XM weather worthwhile?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 27th 05, 05:07 PM
Ron Garret
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is XM weather worthwhile?

My SR22 partners want to install XM weather to the tune of about $10k.
I'm not convinced it's worthwhile. The plane is based in Southern
California where we don't tend to get the kind of squirrelly weather
they get east of the Mississippi. In the summer we'll get isolated
thunderstorms over the desert, but the plane already has a stormscope.
We get marine layer fog, but XM doesn't help with that. The only
situation, it seems to me, where you'd get any use out of it at all is
if you're flying in a winter storm, which I something I never intend to
do (and they're pretty easy to avoid because they sweep in off the
Pacific and can be reliably predicted days, sometimes weeks, in advance).

Does anyone out there think XM weather is worthwhile in SoCal? If so,
why?

Thanks,
rg
  #2  
Old January 27th 05, 07:57 PM
Jack Allison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Does anyone out there think XM weather is worthwhile in SoCal? If so,
why?


Can't comment specifically on XM or SoCal...but, for long x-c flying, we
flew a newer C-182 with the ground based weather uplink system (can't
recall the name at the moment) and it was very helpful in avoiding some
weather enroute. If I was mostly flying VFR in a localized area, I'd
have a hard time coughing up $10K for XM weather...but if I was flying a
significant amount of x-c time, IMHO, it's worth it.

--
Jack Allison
PP-ASEL, IA Student, Student Arrow Buyer

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth
with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there
you will always long to return"
- Leonardo Da Vinci

(Remove the obvious from address to reply via e-mail)
  #3  
Old January 27th 05, 08:24 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Garret" wrote:
Does anyone out there think XM weather is worthwhile in SoCal? If so,
why?


An SR-22 is a nice traveling machine--seems a waste if you never go far in
it. But if no one ever flies anywhere but So. Cal., I'd say no, even though
WxWorx also gives you METARs and TAFs which would be useful.

And waddya mean "the kind of squirrelly weather they get east of the
Mississippi?" Tornado Alley is *west* of the Mississippi, remember. The
weather can get mighty squirrely between the Rockies and the Mississippi. If
you ever take a long trip east, you will be mighty glad you've got satellite
weather.
--
Dan
C-172RG at BFM


  #4  
Old January 27th 05, 10:46 PM
Stan Prevost
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Garret" wrote in message
...
My SR22 partners want to install XM weather to the tune of about $10k.
I'm not convinced it's worthwhile. The plane is based in Southern
California where we don't tend to get the kind of squirrelly weather
they get east of the Mississippi. In the summer we'll get isolated
thunderstorms over the desert, but the plane already has a stormscope.
We get marine layer fog, but XM doesn't help with that. The only
situation, it seems to me, where you'd get any use out of it at all is
if you're flying in a winter storm, which I something I never intend to
do (and they're pretty easy to avoid because they sweep in off the
Pacific and can be reliably predicted days, sometimes weeks, in advance).

Does anyone out there think XM weather is worthwhile in SoCal? If so,
why?


Can't speak to SoCal, but we are based in Alabama and fly from Texas to
Maine, Florida to Wisconsin, and think it is worthwhile. The $10K is a bit
breathtaking, you must be considering a much higher-end installation than we
have. We display on an iPAQ 4700 PDA, using AnyWhereMap software with XM
weather.

Stan


  #5  
Old January 27th 05, 10:57 PM
Victor J. Osborne, Jr.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't like being w/o it. Have had it for a year. Lots of startup
problems w/ support (the 800 phone clone people don;t know from aviation.
"Yes, we have lots of channels") They kept refreshing my 'radio' as a
standard car unit, not aviation.

Having 'said' that, I have it on a EFB and I like the other functions that
having it on an uplink would not allow.

--

Thx, {|;-)

Victor J. (Jim) Osborne, Jr.



take off my shoes to reply


  #6  
Old January 28th 05, 01:19 AM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jack Allison" wrote in message ...
Does anyone out there think XM weather is worthwhile in SoCal? If so, why?


Can't comment specifically on XM or SoCal...but, for long x-c flying, we flew a newer C-182 with the ground based
weather uplink system (can't recall the name at the moment) and it was very helpful in avoiding some weather enroute.
If I was mostly flying VFR in a localized area, I'd have a hard time coughing up $10K for XM weather...but if I was
flying a significant amount of x-c time, IMHO, it's worth it.

--
Jack Allison
PP-ASEL, IA Student, Student Arrow Buyer


Make that long XC flights across the midwest then yes, but for trips up to SFO or similar no way...


  #7  
Old January 28th 05, 04:16 AM
Nathan Young
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:07:48 -0800, Ron Garret
wrote:

My SR22 partners want to install XM weather to the tune of about $10k.
I'm not convinced it's worthwhile. The plane is based in Southern
California where we don't tend to get the kind of squirrelly weather
they get east of the Mississippi. In the summer we'll get isolated
thunderstorms over the desert, but the plane already has a stormscope.
We get marine layer fog, but XM doesn't help with that. The only
situation, it seems to me, where you'd get any use out of it at all is
if you're flying in a winter storm, which I something I never intend to
do (and they're pretty easy to avoid because they sweep in off the
Pacific and can be reliably predicted days, sometimes weeks, in advance).


XM Weather is great. I use a portable version in my Cherokee.

Cost: $2000 tablet PC (which obviously has uses outside the aircraft)
WxWorx portable receiver: ~$800
Monthly svc fee $50

It is really a question of how much you want to pay to have the
integrated hardware vs portable. In a Cherokee, that decision was
easy. The answer is probably different in a $250k plane.

-Nathan


  #8  
Old January 28th 05, 10:10 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As others have said, it depends on how and where you fly. In the
midwest, I have found that when the weather gets bad it can be hard to
find a FSS that has time to talk - "Arrow 27D, you're no. 4 for
weather" so the metars and nexrad become indispensable if you don't
have a stormscope. Around the great lakes, a stormscope won't show
snow showers. AnywhereMap (control vision) has a $2200 PDA system for
which you can get TAF, METAR, and NEXRAD for $30/mo from XM radio.

  #9  
Old January 28th 05, 10:22 PM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote

AnywhereMap (control vision) has a $2200 PDA system for
which you can get TAF, METAR, and NEXRAD for $30/mo from XM radio.


Check on that $2200 price. :-)
--
Jim in NC


  #10  
Old February 7th 05, 11:21 PM
John W. Galvin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Nathan Young" wrote in message
...
XM Weather is great. I use a portable version in my Cherokee.

Cost: $2000 tablet PC (which obviously has uses outside the aircraft)
WxWorx portable receiver: ~$800
Monthly svc fee $50

-Nathan


We have XM Weather on a Tablet PC similar to that mentioned above in our
SR22. Extremely worthwhile for an IFR pilot. Also use JeppView FliteDeck
for approach charts. Personally, I would be hard put to justify the $7,500
Cirrus XM Weather Option and/or the $3,600 Cirrus CMAX Approach Plates
Option and/or the $11,500 Cirrus Terrain Awareness Option when the same or
_better_ functionality can be had with a Tablet PC based option (WxWorx XM
Weather, Jeppesen JeppView FliteDeck, and PCAvionics MountainScope) for
_far_less money.

--Galvin


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Learning more about weather Matt Young Instrument Flight Rules 9 December 23rd 04 01:34 PM
Part 135 Question - Weather Reporting requirement G Farris Instrument Flight Rules 5 October 21st 04 11:05 PM
Cockpit weather display question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 6 July 21st 04 01:07 PM
Looks like the first day of sun 'n fun is out for bad weather Tedstriker Home Built 2 April 14th 04 08:36 PM
Uplink weather advice Richard Kaplan Instrument Flight Rules 15 August 31st 03 11:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.