If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is XM weather worthwhile?
My SR22 partners want to install XM weather to the tune of about $10k.
I'm not convinced it's worthwhile. The plane is based in Southern California where we don't tend to get the kind of squirrelly weather they get east of the Mississippi. In the summer we'll get isolated thunderstorms over the desert, but the plane already has a stormscope. We get marine layer fog, but XM doesn't help with that. The only situation, it seems to me, where you'd get any use out of it at all is if you're flying in a winter storm, which I something I never intend to do (and they're pretty easy to avoid because they sweep in off the Pacific and can be reliably predicted days, sometimes weeks, in advance). Does anyone out there think XM weather is worthwhile in SoCal? If so, why? Thanks, rg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone out there think XM weather is worthwhile in SoCal? If so,
why? Can't comment specifically on XM or SoCal...but, for long x-c flying, we flew a newer C-182 with the ground based weather uplink system (can't recall the name at the moment) and it was very helpful in avoiding some weather enroute. If I was mostly flying VFR in a localized area, I'd have a hard time coughing up $10K for XM weather...but if I was flying a significant amount of x-c time, IMHO, it's worth it. -- Jack Allison PP-ASEL, IA Student, Student Arrow Buyer "When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return" - Leonardo Da Vinci (Remove the obvious from address to reply via e-mail) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron Garret" wrote: Does anyone out there think XM weather is worthwhile in SoCal? If so, why? An SR-22 is a nice traveling machine--seems a waste if you never go far in it. But if no one ever flies anywhere but So. Cal., I'd say no, even though WxWorx also gives you METARs and TAFs which would be useful. And waddya mean "the kind of squirrelly weather they get east of the Mississippi?" Tornado Alley is *west* of the Mississippi, remember. The weather can get mighty squirrely between the Rockies and the Mississippi. If you ever take a long trip east, you will be mighty glad you've got satellite weather. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron Garret" wrote in message ... My SR22 partners want to install XM weather to the tune of about $10k. I'm not convinced it's worthwhile. The plane is based in Southern California where we don't tend to get the kind of squirrelly weather they get east of the Mississippi. In the summer we'll get isolated thunderstorms over the desert, but the plane already has a stormscope. We get marine layer fog, but XM doesn't help with that. The only situation, it seems to me, where you'd get any use out of it at all is if you're flying in a winter storm, which I something I never intend to do (and they're pretty easy to avoid because they sweep in off the Pacific and can be reliably predicted days, sometimes weeks, in advance). Does anyone out there think XM weather is worthwhile in SoCal? If so, why? Can't speak to SoCal, but we are based in Alabama and fly from Texas to Maine, Florida to Wisconsin, and think it is worthwhile. The $10K is a bit breathtaking, you must be considering a much higher-end installation than we have. We display on an iPAQ 4700 PDA, using AnyWhereMap software with XM weather. Stan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I don't like being w/o it. Have had it for a year. Lots of startup
problems w/ support (the 800 phone clone people don;t know from aviation. "Yes, we have lots of channels") They kept refreshing my 'radio' as a standard car unit, not aviation. Having 'said' that, I have it on a EFB and I like the other functions that having it on an uplink would not allow. -- Thx, {|;-) Victor J. (Jim) Osborne, Jr. take off my shoes to reply |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Jack Allison" wrote in message ... Does anyone out there think XM weather is worthwhile in SoCal? If so, why? Can't comment specifically on XM or SoCal...but, for long x-c flying, we flew a newer C-182 with the ground based weather uplink system (can't recall the name at the moment) and it was very helpful in avoiding some weather enroute. If I was mostly flying VFR in a localized area, I'd have a hard time coughing up $10K for XM weather...but if I was flying a significant amount of x-c time, IMHO, it's worth it. -- Jack Allison PP-ASEL, IA Student, Student Arrow Buyer Make that long XC flights across the midwest then yes, but for trips up to SFO or similar no way... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:07:48 -0800, Ron Garret
wrote: My SR22 partners want to install XM weather to the tune of about $10k. I'm not convinced it's worthwhile. The plane is based in Southern California where we don't tend to get the kind of squirrelly weather they get east of the Mississippi. In the summer we'll get isolated thunderstorms over the desert, but the plane already has a stormscope. We get marine layer fog, but XM doesn't help with that. The only situation, it seems to me, where you'd get any use out of it at all is if you're flying in a winter storm, which I something I never intend to do (and they're pretty easy to avoid because they sweep in off the Pacific and can be reliably predicted days, sometimes weeks, in advance). XM Weather is great. I use a portable version in my Cherokee. Cost: $2000 tablet PC (which obviously has uses outside the aircraft) WxWorx portable receiver: ~$800 Monthly svc fee $50 It is really a question of how much you want to pay to have the integrated hardware vs portable. In a Cherokee, that decision was easy. The answer is probably different in a $250k plane. -Nathan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
As others have said, it depends on how and where you fly. In the
midwest, I have found that when the weather gets bad it can be hard to find a FSS that has time to talk - "Arrow 27D, you're no. 4 for weather" so the metars and nexrad become indispensable if you don't have a stormscope. Around the great lakes, a stormscope won't show snow showers. AnywhereMap (control vision) has a $2200 PDA system for which you can get TAF, METAR, and NEXRAD for $30/mo from XM radio. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
wrote AnywhereMap (control vision) has a $2200 PDA system for which you can get TAF, METAR, and NEXRAD for $30/mo from XM radio. Check on that $2200 price. :-) -- Jim in NC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan Young" wrote in message
... XM Weather is great. I use a portable version in my Cherokee. Cost: $2000 tablet PC (which obviously has uses outside the aircraft) WxWorx portable receiver: ~$800 Monthly svc fee $50 -Nathan We have XM Weather on a Tablet PC similar to that mentioned above in our SR22. Extremely worthwhile for an IFR pilot. Also use JeppView FliteDeck for approach charts. Personally, I would be hard put to justify the $7,500 Cirrus XM Weather Option and/or the $3,600 Cirrus CMAX Approach Plates Option and/or the $11,500 Cirrus Terrain Awareness Option when the same or _better_ functionality can be had with a Tablet PC based option (WxWorx XM Weather, Jeppesen JeppView FliteDeck, and PCAvionics MountainScope) for _far_less money. --Galvin |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Learning more about weather | Matt Young | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | December 23rd 04 01:34 PM |
Part 135 Question - Weather Reporting requirement | G Farris | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | October 21st 04 11:05 PM |
Cockpit weather display question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | July 21st 04 01:07 PM |
Looks like the first day of sun 'n fun is out for bad weather | Tedstriker | Home Built | 2 | April 14th 04 08:36 PM |
Uplink weather advice | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | August 31st 03 11:39 PM |