A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Engine... Overhaul? / Replace? advice please



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 16th 04, 02:54 PM
Alex
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"text news" wrote in message ...
The engine in our 1972 C172 (0-320-E2D) is now due for overhaul after 2800
hours as lead particles have started appearing in the oil filter. (Top
overhaul was at 1500, bottom end untouched). Still running beautifully, no
vibration, plenty of power, good compressions etc...



Hi!

Have you considered this option;

http://www.centurion-engines.com/index.htm

Does anyone has experiences about their engines?

br,

Alex
  #12  
Old February 17th 04, 04:44 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

G.R. Patterson III wrote:

text news wrote:


snip

I understand that with "re-built" you get a new log book. This sounds good
but in practice it is because the engine has been re-built from a collection
of untraceable parts, hence the new log book, so the advantage seems
emotional rather than mechanical!



You've been lied to. When Lycoming creates a remanufactured engine, they use mainly
new parts. Whether new or used, all parts used meet the spcifications for new parts.
That's the logic behind the new logbook.


If "mainly" means pistons and cylinders, yes. So by parts-count, I guess you
could say "mainly". But AFAIK you are taking pot luck on some pretty expensive
parts: crank, cam, case.


When Lycoming overhauls an engine, they also use used parts "from a collection of
untraceable parts", but those parts only have to meet the specifications for return
to service. Either way, they install new pistons and cylinders.


New pistons and cylinders, yes. Since the prices of new pistons and cylinders
from Lyc have dropped so drastically a few years ago, I don't think anyone is
overhauling Lyc cylinders any more. The cost of overhaul is too close to the new
price.

snip


The main thing that gives problems is the cylinders. In a field overhaul, your
old cylinders are usually bored and re-used. If necessary, the bore may be
plated back up to size. Other things may be done to recondition them, but, any
way you look at it, they've put up with a lot of abuse. Few cylinders will reach
TBO three times; some won't make it twice. Lycoming replaces the cylinders with
new.


I think this is obsolete information. It was true a few years ago, but these
days field-overahulers are putting in all-new cylinders.

snip

Dave
Remove SHIRT to reply directly.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I Robert Clark Military Aviation 2 May 26th 04 06:42 PM
Advice on Ford V-8 Engine Thought Holger Stephan Home Built 3 February 20th 04 04:04 PM
engine overhaul & autopilot question CriticalMass Owning 8 February 13th 04 06:11 PM
How much to replace cracked crankshaft in 1972 skyhawk O-320-E2D engine Dave Gribble Owning 2 February 4th 04 08:30 AM
When does an engine needs an overhaul? Victor Owning 9 August 15th 03 04:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.