If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
KX155 KX 155A Anybody know the difference?
The KX155 in my "new" airplane (Helio Courier) seems to have bitten the
dust. It looks like an old POS and I am trying to figure out what to do. What are the functional differences between the KX155, KX165 and the KX155A and KX165A? The airplane has a Garmin 300XL as #1 and a switching relay to allow the 300XL or the KX155 to drive the HSI. I am trying to decide what to do. My options a A: #1 Garmin 430 #2 KX155 Get rid of the "GPS/NAV" switch/annunciator box B: Same as A but with 530. Pricey, but I could just buy the tray and connectors and shuttle the 530 in my MU-2 back and forth until Garmin has WAAS and then buy a 530A for the MU-2. This has the advantage of presumably saving the cost of the WAAS upgrade thereby reducing the 530 premium somewhat. C: #1 Currently installed 300XL. #2 KX 155 or 165 I would prefer the 165 since I can get rid of the converter box that drives the HSI. Keep the GPS/NAV switch/annunciator box The advantage of going with a 430 or 530 is that I have flown them for 800+ hrs and am comfortable with the operating logic. I can't say the same about the 300X:L. Cost is an issue. This is a second airplane and I anticipate using it 95% VFR. I would rather spend the money on floats or skis :-). Since the airplane may be left unattended in the backcountry for days at a time, I would also like avionics that are not very attractive to a thief. What do you think? Mike MU-2 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 01:03:13 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote: The KX155 in my "new" airplane (Helio Courier) seems to have bitten the dust. It looks like an old POS and I am trying to figure out what to do. What are the functional differences between the KX155, KX165 and the KX155A and KX165A? The airplane has a Garmin 300XL as #1 and a switching relay to allow the 300XL or the KX155 to drive the HSI. I am trying to decide what to do. My options a A: #1 Garmin 430 #2 KX155 Get rid of the "GPS/NAV" switch/annunciator box B: Same as A but with 530. Pricey, but I could just buy the tray and connectors and shuttle the 530 in my MU-2 back and forth until Garmin has WAAS and then buy a 530A for the MU-2. This has the advantage of presumably saving the cost of the WAAS upgrade thereby reducing the 530 premium somewhat. C: #1 Currently installed 300XL. #2 KX 155 or 165 I would prefer the 165 since I can get rid of the converter box that drives the HSI. Keep the GPS/NAV switch/annunciator box The advantage of going with a 430 or 530 is that I have flown them for 800+ hrs and am comfortable with the operating logic. I can't say the same about the 300X:L. Cost is an issue. This is a second airplane and I anticipate using it 95% VFR. I would rather spend the money on floats or skis :-). Since the airplane may be left unattended in the backcountry for days at a time, I would also like avionics that are not very attractive to a thief. What do you think? Mike MU-2 Slightly tongue in cheek, but not entirely rediculous. A. Make the Courier a 100% VFR airplane for a while, bring a handheld, and spend the money on skiis or floats. When the WAAS technology comes out, you'll have more money again (hopefully) and you can do the radio upgrade once and the way you want it. B. Buy a used nav/comm cheap that will fit in the same slot, and use the money you save on skiis or floats. This 'll keep the IFR abilities and still get you the skiis or floats. May not be entirely practical but just thought I'd throw it out there. I think you can tell I like the idea of added use with skiis or floats. z PS. The 155A replaces the 155 which is no longer available. It has an internal CDI (which may help you get rid of your switching relay), 32 program sets, self dimming panel, yoke mounted frequency flip flop, timers, and some other goodies. HTH. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"zatatime" wrote in message ... On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 01:03:13 GMT, "Mike Rapoport" wrote: The KX155 in my "new" airplane (Helio Courier) seems to have bitten the dust. It looks like an old POS and I am trying to figure out what to do. What are the functional differences between the KX155, KX165 and the KX155A and KX165A? The airplane has a Garmin 300XL as #1 and a switching relay to allow the 300XL or the KX155 to drive the HSI. I am trying to decide what to do. My options a A: #1 Garmin 430 #2 KX155 Get rid of the "GPS/NAV" switch/annunciator box B: Same as A but with 530. Pricey, but I could just buy the tray and connectors and shuttle the 530 in my MU-2 back and forth until Garmin has WAAS and then buy a 530A for the MU-2. This has the advantage of presumably saving the cost of the WAAS upgrade thereby reducing the 530 premium somewhat. C: #1 Currently installed 300XL. #2 KX 155 or 165 I would prefer the 165 since I can get rid of the converter box that drives the HSI. Keep the GPS/NAV switch/annunciator box The advantage of going with a 430 or 530 is that I have flown them for 800+ hrs and am comfortable with the operating logic. I can't say the same about the 300X:L. Cost is an issue. This is a second airplane and I anticipate using it 95% VFR. I would rather spend the money on floats or skis :-). Since the airplane may be left unattended in the backcountry for days at a time, I would also like avionics that are not very attractive to a thief. What do you think? Mike MU-2 Slightly tongue in cheek, but not entirely rediculous. A. Make the Courier a 100% VFR airplane for a while, bring a handheld, and spend the money on skiis or floats. When the WAAS technology comes out, you'll have more money again (hopefully) and you can do the radio upgrade once and the way you want it. B. Buy a used nav/comm cheap that will fit in the same slot, and use the money you save on skiis or floats. This 'll keep the IFR abilities and still get you the skiis or floats. May not be entirely practical but just thought I'd throw it out there. I think you can tell I like the idea of added use with skiis or floats. z PS. The 155A replaces the 155 which is no longer available. It has an internal CDI (which may help you get rid of your switching relay), 32 program sets, self dimming panel, yoke mounted frequency flip flop, timers, and some other goodies. HTH. Thanks for your thoughts! Don't worry, I'm buying the skis and floats! Mike MU-2 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
You can update the looks of your KX155 by ordering a new front panel
(which includes the display). I see ads for this in Trade-a-Plane, but you could probably order from Bendix-King too. I never knew the deltas between the variations of King's Nav-Coms, so I spent a bit of time on their site (https://www3.bendixking.com/static/brochures/index.jsp). Here's what I distilled from the info: -KX155, 155A, 165, and 165A are all 10W radios. -All are 760 channels COM and 200 channels Nav (exception being 165A which can be ordered with 8.33kHz spacing). Difference between the 155s and 165s are primarily the integration of a VOR/LOC converter in the 165. As well the KX165 adds a digital radial readout (accessed by pulling out the Nav tuner button). The A suffix indicates a newer design that supports some cool microprocessor-oriented features: -Programmed COM channels -Stuck mic indications -Timer -Integrated CDI Also, If you go with option B below. Be sure to investigate how many insertion cycles the connectors on the 530 can take. I would be surprised if they are designed with that kind of mission in mind. It certainly wouldn't hurt to transfer it between planes a few times, but after a few hundred, who knows. On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 01:03:13 GMT, "Mike Rapoport" wrote: The KX155 in my "new" airplane (Helio Courier) seems to have bitten the dust. It looks like an old POS and I am trying to figure out what to do. What are the functional differences between the KX155, KX165 and the KX155A and KX165A? The airplane has a Garmin 300XL as #1 and a switching relay to allow the 300XL or the KX155 to drive the HSI. I am trying to decide what to do. My options a A: #1 Garmin 430 #2 KX155 Get rid of the "GPS/NAV" switch/annunciator box B: Same as A but with 530. Pricey, but I could just buy the tray and connectors and shuttle the 530 in my MU-2 back and forth until Garmin has WAAS and then buy a 530A for the MU-2. This has the advantage of presumably saving the cost of the WAAS upgrade thereby reducing the 530 premium somewhat. C: #1 Currently installed 300XL. #2 KX 155 or 165 I would prefer the 165 since I can get rid of the converter box that drives the HSI. Keep the GPS/NAV switch/annunciator box The advantage of going with a 430 or 530 is that I have flown them for 800+ hrs and am comfortable with the operating logic. I can't say the same about the 300X:L. Cost is an issue. This is a second airplane and I anticipate using it 95% VFR. I would rather spend the money on floats or skis :-). Since the airplane may be left unattended in the backcountry for days at a time, I would also like avionics that are not very attractive to a thief. What do you think? Mike MU-2 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan Young" wrote in message news You can update the looks of your KX155 by ordering a new front panel (which includes the display). I see ads for this in Trade-a-Plane, but you could probably order from Bendix-King too. I never knew the deltas between the variations of King's Nav-Coms, so I spent a bit of time on their site (https://www3.bendixking.com/static/brochures/index.jsp). Here's what I distilled from the info: -KX155, 155A, 165, and 165A are all 10W radios. -All are 760 channels COM and 200 channels Nav (exception being 165A which can be ordered with 8.33kHz spacing). Difference between the 155s and 165s are primarily the integration of a VOR/LOC converter in the 165. As well the KX165 adds a digital radial readout (accessed by pulling out the Nav tuner button). The A suffix indicates a newer design that supports some cool microprocessor-oriented features: -Programmed COM channels -Stuck mic indications -Timer -Integrated CDI Also, If you go with option B below. Be sure to investigate how many insertion cycles the connectors on the 530 can take. I would be surprised if they are designed with that kind of mission in mind. It certainly wouldn't hurt to transfer it between planes a few times, but after a few hundred, who knows. Thanks. Good point! I hadn't considered insertion/extraction limits. Mike MU-2 On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 01:03:13 GMT, "Mike Rapoport" wrote: The KX155 in my "new" airplane (Helio Courier) seems to have bitten the dust. It looks like an old POS and I am trying to figure out what to do. What are the functional differences between the KX155, KX165 and the KX155A and KX165A? The airplane has a Garmin 300XL as #1 and a switching relay to allow the 300XL or the KX155 to drive the HSI. I am trying to decide what to do. My options a A: #1 Garmin 430 #2 KX155 Get rid of the "GPS/NAV" switch/annunciator box B: Same as A but with 530. Pricey, but I could just buy the tray and connectors and shuttle the 530 in my MU-2 back and forth until Garmin has WAAS and then buy a 530A for the MU-2. This has the advantage of presumably saving the cost of the WAAS upgrade thereby reducing the 530 premium somewhat. C: #1 Currently installed 300XL. #2 KX 155 or 165 I would prefer the 165 since I can get rid of the converter box that drives the HSI. Keep the GPS/NAV switch/annunciator box The advantage of going with a 430 or 530 is that I have flown them for 800+ hrs and am comfortable with the operating logic. I can't say the same about the 300X:L. Cost is an issue. This is a second airplane and I anticipate using it 95% VFR. I would rather spend the money on floats or skis :-). Since the airplane may be left unattended in the backcountry for days at a time, I would also like avionics that are not very attractive to a thief. What do you think? Mike MU-2 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan Young" wrote in message news Difference between the 155s and 165s are primarily the integration of a VOR/LOC converter in the 165. As well the KX165 adds a digital radial readout (accessed by pulling out the Nav tuner button). The A suffix indicates a newer design that supports some cool microprocessor-oriented features: -Programmed COM channels -Stuck mic indications -Timer -Integrated CDI Also, If you go with option B below. Be sure to investigate how many insertion cycles the connectors on the 530 can take. I would be surprised if they are designed with that kind of mission in mind. It certainly wouldn't hurt to transfer it between planes a few times, but after a few hundred, who knows. Wouldn't that be reduced by the 430/530 preselecting frequencies which are then "flip-flopped"? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I wish I knew.
In fact I just dropped one off at the avionics shop. Hit the transmit key and the display goes blank, and the unit goes silent. Huh? Kent Felkins "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... The KX155 in my "new" airplane (Helio Courier) seems to have bitten the dust. It looks like an old POS and I am trying to figure out what to do. What are the functional differences between the KX155, KX165 and the KX155A and KX165A? The airplane has a Garmin 300XL as #1 and a switching relay to allow the 300XL or the KX155 to drive the HSI. I am trying to decide what to do. My options a A: #1 Garmin 430 #2 KX155 Get rid of the "GPS/NAV" switch/annunciator box B: Same as A but with 530. Pricey, but I could just buy the tray and connectors and shuttle the 530 in my MU-2 back and forth until Garmin has WAAS and then buy a 530A for the MU-2. This has the advantage of presumably saving the cost of the WAAS upgrade thereby reducing the 530 premium somewhat. C: #1 Currently installed 300XL. #2 KX 155 or 165 I would prefer the 165 since I can get rid of the converter box that drives the HSI. Keep the GPS/NAV switch/annunciator box The advantage of going with a 430 or 530 is that I have flown them for 800+ hrs and am comfortable with the operating logic. I can't say the same about the 300X:L. Cost is an issue. This is a second airplane and I anticipate using it 95% VFR. I would rather spend the money on floats or skis :-). Since the airplane may be left unattended in the backcountry for days at a time, I would also like avionics that are not very attractive to a thief. What do you think? Mike MU-2 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article . net,
Mike Rapoport wrote: The KX155 in my "new" airplane (Helio Courier) seems to have bitten the dust. In what way? Your cheapest option is probably to get it repaired. The displays in particular seem to have a much shorter lifespan than the rest of the radio. After that it's probably the harness or the antenna/connection. Never buy today what you can put off buying until tommorow. ;-) -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
THE major difference between the KX-155/165 and KX-155A/165A is this:
http://www.faa.gov/certification/air...st/8400-11.doc 3. Harmonic interference (12th and 13th harmonic) from VHF transmissions on 121.150, 121.175, 121.200, 131.250, 131.275, and 131.300 MHz has been observed to adversely affect reception of the GPS signal. Low pass or notch filters (with an insertion loss of 2 Db or less or the aircraft VHF COM radio must be re-certified) installed at the output of the VHF transmitter to attenuate the undesired harmonic signal, or modification of the VHF transmitter to improve internal harmonic attenuation, may be required. Shorted stubs, of appropriate lengths, could also possibly provide effective filtering and antenna matching." The straight 155/165 was designed long before GPS was ever envisioned, and are very noisy in 12th and 13th harmonics. Most IFR installations with these radios were made without regard to the interference, with the certifying pilot either ignorant or lying about the interference. The "A" model was designed to be free of these interferences. Other nice features are much better feeling rotary switches, with smoother, shorter and more precise clicks. Also, the 165A is available with 8.33 MHz spacing. The US may or may not go to 8.33 spacing, but since Europe already has the US will probably tow the line, like they did with METARS/TAF. Which brings up a funny point. I fly all over Europe regularly. IT is very uncommon to see a proper METAR/TAF report sequence. They report as they damn well please with any sequence that comes to mind at the moment. To get a proper sequence you need to fly in the US. So much for the vaulted "commonality" that was forced down our throats! Karl "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... The KX155 in my "new" airplane (Helio Courier) seems to have bitten the dust. It looks like an old POS and I am trying to figure out what to do. What are the functional differences between the KX155, KX165 and the KX155A and KX165A? The airplane has a Garmin 300XL as #1 and a switching relay to allow the 300XL or the KX155 to drive the HSI. I am trying to decide what to do. My options a A: #1 Garmin 430 #2 KX155 Get rid of the "GPS/NAV" switch/annunciator box B: Same as A but with 530. Pricey, but I could just buy the tray and connectors and shuttle the 530 in my MU-2 back and forth until Garmin has WAAS and then buy a 530A for the MU-2. This has the advantage of presumably saving the cost of the WAAS upgrade thereby reducing the 530 premium somewhat. C: #1 Currently installed 300XL. #2 KX 155 or 165 I would prefer the 165 since I can get rid of the converter box that drives the HSI. Keep the GPS/NAV switch/annunciator box The advantage of going with a 430 or 530 is that I have flown them for 800+ hrs and am comfortable with the operating logic. I can't say the same about the 300X:L. Cost is an issue. This is a second airplane and I anticipate using it 95% VFR. I would rather spend the money on floats or skis :-). Since the airplane may be left unattended in the backcountry for days at a time, I would also like avionics that are not very attractive to a thief. What do you think? Mike MU-2 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Rapoport wrote:
The KX155 in my "new" airplane (Helio Courier) seems to have bitten the dust. It looks like an old POS and I am trying to figure out what to do. What are the functional differences between the KX155, KX165 and the KX155A and KX165A? There's a list of the differences between KX155 and KX155A at http://www.seaerospace.com/king/kx155a.htm Look for the items in the list with an asterisk. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
weight difference | Lou Parker | Home Built | 7 | October 27th 04 02:42 AM |
The main difference between Europe and USA | noname | Military Aviation | 0 | May 31st 04 03:23 AM |
Difference in a Lycoming 65 vs. Contenintal 65 | JR | Home Built | 1 | November 29th 03 03:20 PM |
KX155 Pinouts | Richard Kelly | Owning | 1 | September 3rd 03 04:24 PM |
Mode S Transponders - Can ATC tell the difference? | Doodybutch | Owning | 2 | August 10th 03 06:21 AM |