A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

MRB DP NOTAM



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 10th 04, 05:27 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MRB DP NOTAM

NOTAM issued today:

USD 03/002 MRB TRIXY TWO DEPARTURE ... TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: RWY 8, 17:
STANDARD. RWY 26: 500-1 OR STANDARD WITH A MINIMUM CLIMB OF 310 FT PER
NM
TO 2000. RWY 35: NA. DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION: RWY 8: CLIMB VIA
HEADING
080 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT LDN
R-019
TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 17: CLIMB
VIA
HEADING 170 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT
LDN
R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 26:
CLIMB
VIA HEADING 260,INTERCEPT LDN R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION)
OR
(ASSIGNED ROUTE).


  #2  
Old March 10th 04, 05:39 PM
Michael 182
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is there a question or comment here?

Michael

wrote in message ...
NOTAM issued today:

USD 03/002 MRB TRIXY TWO DEPARTURE ... TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: RWY 8, 17:
STANDARD. RWY 26: 500-1 OR STANDARD WITH A MINIMUM CLIMB OF 310 FT PER
NM
TO 2000. RWY 35: NA. DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION: RWY 8: CLIMB VIA
HEADING
080 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT LDN
R-019
TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 17: CLIMB
VIA
HEADING 170 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT
LDN
R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 26:
CLIMB
VIA HEADING 260,INTERCEPT LDN R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION)
OR
(ASSIGNED ROUTE).




  #3  
Old March 10th 04, 06:04 PM
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, and that was it.
You'd need to read earlier parts of the thread, I suppose.
---JRC---

"Michael 182" wrote in message =
news:dpI3c.224440$jk2.924040@attbi_s53...
Is there a question or comment here?
=20
Michael
=20
wrote in message =

...
NOTAM issued today:

USD 03/002 MRB TRIXY TWO DEPARTURE ... TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS: RWY 8, 17:
STANDARD. RWY 26: 500-1 OR STANDARD WITH A MINIMUM CLIMB OF 310 FT =

PER
NM
TO 2000. RWY 35: NA. DEPARTURE ROUTE DESCRIPTION: RWY 8: CLIMB VIA
HEADING
080 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, INTERCEPT LDN
R-019
TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY 17: =

CLIMB
VIA
HEADING 170 TO 1600 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN VIA HEADING 260, =

INTERCEPT
LDN
R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA (TRANSITION) OR (ASSIGNED ROUTE). RWY =

26:
CLIMB
VIA HEADING 260,INTERCEPT LDN R-019 TO TRIXY INT THEN VIA =

(TRANSITION)
OR
(ASSIGNED ROUTE).


=20

  #4  
Old March 10th 04, 06:15 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
news

Yes, and that was it.
You'd need to read earlier parts of the thread, I suppose.


There are no earlier parts of the thread. The message containing the NOTAM
was the first message in the thread.


  #5  
Old March 10th 04, 06:15 PM
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message =
hlink.net...
=20
"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
news

Yes, and that was it.
You'd need to read earlier parts of the thread, I suppose.

=20
There are no earlier parts of the thread. The message containing the =

NOTAM
was the first message in the thread.
=20
=20

Mea Culpa, Steven.
I read *that other* thread, and just failed to notice he started a new =
one.
I'll do penance, I promise. :-(
---JRC---

  #6  
Old March 10th 04, 06:39 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael 182 ) wrote:

Is there a question or comment here?


I believe this refers to a previous r.a.ifr thread started by Richard
Kaplan discussing some ambiguity with a departure procedure text
description.

After a few posts, someone from here contacted the Feds and was able to get
the text of the departure procedure corrected. Hence the NOTAM.

--
Peter












----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #7  
Old March 10th 04, 06:39 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
...

Mea Culpa, Steven.
I read *that other* thread, and just failed to notice he started a new

one.
I'll do penance, I promise. :-(


Go out on the ramp, face Kill Devil Hill, kneel, and recite the poem "High
Flight" three times. Then go forth and sin no more.


  #8  
Old March 10th 04, 06:44 PM
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message =
hlink.net...
=20
"John R. Copeland" wrote in message
...

Mea Culpa, Steven.
I read *that other* thread, and just failed to notice he started a =

new
one.
I'll do penance, I promise. :-(

=20
Go out on the ramp, face Kill Devil Hill, kneel, and recite the poem =

"High
Flight" three times. Then go forth and sin no more.
=20
=20


Making the sign of the cross, and reciting slowly and solemnly:
"Omni, Omni, Tacan, DME."
---JRC---


  #9  
Old March 10th 04, 06:48 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Michael 182 wrote:

Is there a question or comment here?


No. You apparently didn't follow the extensive thread about this a couple of
weeks ago.

  #10  
Old March 10th 04, 06:50 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Peter R." wrote:

Michael 182 ) wrote:

Is there a question or comment here?


I believe this refers to a previous r.a.ifr thread started by Richard
Kaplan discussing some ambiguity with a departure procedure text
description.

After a few posts, someone from here contacted the Feds and was able to get
the text of the departure procedure corrected. Hence the NOTAM.


Correct. Since old threads die around here, I posted it anew.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AF/D's and NOTAM Andrew Sarangan Instrument Flight Rules 9 January 19th 04 09:19 PM
WinNotam - new Notam organizer tool JetVision Software Instrument Flight Rules 0 December 14th 03 08:00 PM
Misleading Notam Greg Esres Instrument Flight Rules 12 December 3rd 03 04:16 AM
ILS Notam question John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 6 August 22nd 03 11:53 PM
"GPS Unreliable" NOTAM Robert Henry Instrument Flight Rules 20 July 23rd 03 01:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.