If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
If ATC tells you to remain outside you have to remain outside, whay requires you to read it back? Because if you don't read it back, they have no way to know that you have acknowledged their call to you. Believe me, if ATC gives me an instruction and unless I respond to the contrary they assume that I've heard and will comply. The sole exception to this is runway hold-short/crossing restrictions. Where's the requirement for radar contact? Where's the requirement for a readback? For class C, they will always tell you 'radar contact location, say altitude' No they won't. Not in any stretch. They'll only tell you radar contact if you are indeed in radar contact. This usually happens after a transponder code is issued etc.... None of this has anything to do with your operating in class C airspace. Class B, they'll tell you 'radar contact location, cleared through/into xxx Class B airspace' along with an altimeter setting for the major airport in their area. Again, RADAR CONTACT is a different concept from either the clearance or the altimeter setting. The altimeter setting will be that of what they are using (which may or may not be associated with an airport). That is a requirement for ATC to give you when entering Class B or C airspace. See the 7110.65, sections 5-3-1 through 5-3-6. There's the requirement. If they tell you to remain outside a given airspace, you had best readback that you are remaining outside that airspace. 7-9-2 gives leeway for the readback. No, those sections don't have anything to do with entering airspace. This is again a fundamental issue you seem to fail to want to understand. Radar service is a service. The airspace indicates where you might expect to find it, but the authorization to operate in any given airspace is NOT dependent on RADAR SERVICES being offered. I've operated out of the primary airport of a CLASS B airspace with NO RADAR SERVICE POSSIBLE (my transponder was out and their primary radar was out at the same time). |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ron Natalie wrote: A Guy Called Tyketto wrote: No clearance is required. For Class C airspace, 2-way communication is the clearance into that airspace. No, ATC doesn't ahve to 'clear' you into it, but the communication is the clearance as is. No clearance is required. Do you know what CLEARANCE means? I never said that they will *CLEAR* you into Class C airspace; but that the 2-way communication *IS* the clearance. Class B is another story. Again I state, you don't seem to understand what a clearance is. No clearance is required and none is given in a class C. 2 Way communication is NEVER a clearance. There's your clearance through/into Class C. Not that ATC will *CLEAR* you, but if they respond to your call, and that Approach controller is operating Class C airspace, their call back to you *IS* your clearance into or through that Class C airspace. Yes, They will have you at Radar contact after you squawk the xpdr setting, but that doesn't require any readback. But you asked about clearance, so there you have it. No readbacks here are required at all and no clearance is involved. of BLD, cleared into Class Bravo Airspace, maintain VFR at or below 8500, Las Vegas altimeter xx.xx You then are cleared into Class B. Read the documents yourself, if you don't believe me. Better yet, call the ATC when they chastise you for not reading back anything that tells you to remain outside of a given airspace for a reason. I have read the documents, I know what they say. RADAR CONTACT and all that ather crap, readbacks, and 90% of your other assertions have nothing to do with authorization to operate in any airspace. The only restriction is two way comms for class C and D and a clearance for B. The rest, while it is frequently coincident with operation in these airspaces are NOT PART OF ANY ATC OR PILOT REQUIREMENT. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Happy Dog wrote:
If you were outside Class B, bull****. That area, above 1000' is class B airspace or a control zone. Nothing but the word "cleared" is a clearance. It may have happened. But you were in violation because the controller, whatever he meant, didn't clear you into Class B. Control Zones haven't existed in a decade. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Happy Dog wrote:
Funny that. I flew from Toronto to NYC around that time. Maybe the same day. I was astounded at the rate of change in settings. Never seen that happen before. Maybe you were one of the airline pilots I heard commenting on it. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Icebound wrote:
"Roger" is definitely more professional than "Thanks". Now THAT is truly a waste of bandwidth. Any "aviation-communication" text that I have ever read, discourages the use of "thanks" or "thank you" etc... as being totally redundant and useless... There's the text and then there is the reality, a difference that someone who only reads about aviation most likely misses. A small thank you is not redundant and useless, especially if the controller really did do something that made your flying just a bit easier. After all, we are still civilized human beings. For example, when I am approaching my class C airport from the opposite end of the active runway, I will often request a straight-in to the opposite runway (winds depending). A move like this will shave off perhaps ten minutes of vectors and after a long flight, this might mean the difference between a properly emptied bladder and an improperly emptied bladder. Often times ATC will go out of their way to accommodate this request, including slowing up an aircraft being vectored for an approach to the active runway. Keep in mind that ATC has absolutely no obligation to do this and a "thank you" from me hopefully demonstrates to him/her that his/her efforts were appreciated. Conversely, I have been thanked many times by ATC after doing something that made their work a little easier, such as 360s, S-turns, not complaining when being vectored through the localizer to join on the other side, or going around. I certainly like to hear those words. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron Natalie"
A Guy Called Tyketto wrote: If ATC tells you to remain outside you have to remain outside, whay requires you to read it back? Because if you don't read it back, they have no way to know that you have acknowledged their call to you. Believe me, if ATC gives me an instruction and unless I respond to the contrary they assume that I've heard and will comply. The sole exception to this is runway hold-short/crossing restrictions. I assume you mean that you only acknowledge the transmission. Or are you saying that an instruction to change heading, climb, descend etc. won't provoke a followup response of you don't respond? Traffic alerts? I hear ATC say the call sign and their facility name all the time to pilots who don't respond to transmissions quire frequently. Where's the requirement for radar contact? Where's the requirement for a readback? Class B, they'll tell you 'radar contact location, cleared through/into xxx Class B airspace' along with an altimeter setting for the major airport in their area. Again, RADAR CONTACT is a different concept from either the clearance or the altimeter setting. The altimeter setting will be that of what they are using (which may or may not be associated with an airport). Of course. What's the "major airport" in NYC airspace? That is a requirement for ATC to give you when entering Class B or C airspace. See the 7110.65, sections 5-3-1 through 5-3-6. There's the requirement. If they tell you to remain outside a given airspace, you had best readback that you are remaining outside that airspace. 7-9-2 gives leeway for the readback. No, those sections don't have anything to do with entering airspace. This is again a fundamental issue you seem to fail to want to understand. Radar service is a service. The airspace indicates where you might expect to find it, but the authorization to operate in any given airspace is NOT dependent on RADAR SERVICES being offered. I've operated out of the primary airport of a CLASS B airspace with NO RADAR SERVICE POSSIBLE (my transponder was out and their primary radar was out at the same time). Correct, unless otherwise indicated. Some control zones require Mode C. moo |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron Natalie"
If you were outside Class B, bull****. That area, above 1000' is class B airspace or a control zone. Nothing but the word "cleared" is a clearance. It may have happened. But you were in violation because the controller, whatever he meant, didn't clear you into Class B. Control Zones haven't existed in a decade. Oops! I'm from Canada. We still have them. moo |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
"Happy Dog" wrote in message . .. Correct, unless otherwise indicated. Some control zones require Mode C. We don't have control zones in the US, haven't had them for almost twelve years now. When we did have them none of them required Mode C. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
Correct, unless otherwise indicated. Some control zones require Mode C. We don't have control zones in the US, haven't had them for almost twelve years now. When we did have them none of them required Mode C. As I said in a previous post, I'm from Canada. We have them and some require Mode C. moo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What F-102 units were called up for Viet Nam | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 101 | March 5th 06 03:13 AM |