B747 Loses All 4 Generators Due To Clogged Sink In 1st Class Galley

Fortunately the flight wasn't mid-Pacific when this occurred:


http://www.smh.com.au/news/travel/cr...554654270.html
Crash threat

January 9, 2008

A Qantas 747 with 344 passengers on board could have faced
catastrophe after losing power from all four of its generators on
its descent into Bangkok on Monday.
...
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau said it had been told the
power from the main generators was lost 15 minutes away from
Bangkok.
...


http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#196921
...
"In this case it looks as if it has gone to the last stage of
emergency power for communication and navigation," Dr. Arvind
Sinha, director of aerospace at RMIT University in Melbourne, told
the Sydney Morning Herald. "After that it comes down to the skill
and experience of the crew." He added that the loss of all four
generators is "unheard of" but Murphy can and does find a way,
this time through a sink with a clogged drain in the first class
galley. ...

The sink is right over the electrical distribution unit and Boeing
engineers evidently considered the potential for leaks when they
put it there. A drip tray is installed to catch any overflow from
the sink but the tray on this aircraft was cracked.

On Jan 10, 2:37*pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
Fortunately the flight wasn't mid-Pacific when this occurred:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/travel/cr...08/11995546542...
* * Crash threat

* * January 9, 2008

* * A Qantas 747 with 344 passengers on board could have faced
* * catastrophe after losing power from all four of its generators on
* * its descent into Bangkok on Monday.

Lar, This story doesnt make a whole lotta sense and seems a bit too
dramatic ("Could have faced catasophe"?). I wouldnt believe everything
on Avweb.
Frank

Larry Dighera wrote:
Fortunately the flight wasn't mid-Pacific when this occurred:


http://www.smh.com.au/news/travel/cr...554654270.html
Crash threat

January 9, 2008

A Qantas 747 with 344 passengers on board could have faced
catastrophe after losing power from all four of its generators on
its descent into Bangkok on Monday.
...
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau said it had been told the
power from the main generators was lost 15 minutes away from
Bangkok.
...


http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#196921
...
"In this case it looks as if it has gone to the last stage of
emergency power for communication and navigation," Dr. Arvind
Sinha, director of aerospace at RMIT University in Melbourne, told
the Sydney Morning Herald. "After that it comes down to the skill
and experience of the crew." He added that the loss of all four
generators is "unheard of" but Murphy can and does find a way,
this time through a sink with a clogged drain in the first class
galley. ...

The sink is right over the electrical distribution unit and Boeing
engineers evidently considered the potential for leaks when they
put it there. A drip tray is installed to catch any overflow from
the sink but the tray on this aircraft was cracked.


Did you really need to post it twice? And we know it wasn't an accident
because you've got 2 different pre-post comments.


Now for the guys with "Heavy" experience. Does the 747 really only have
enough onboard battery power to last a little over an hour for the
flight deck?

On Jan 10, 3:14*pm, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote:
Fortunately the flight wasn't mid-Pacific when this occurred:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/travel/cr...08/11995546542...
* * Crash threat

* * January 9, 2008

* * A Qantas 747 with 344 passengers on board could have faced
* * catastrophe after losing power from all four of its generators on
* * its descent into Bangkok on Monday.
* * ...
* * The Australian Transport Safety Bureau said it had been told the
* * power from the main generators was lost 15 minutes away from
* * Bangkok.
* * ...

*http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#196921
* * ...
* * "In this case it looks as if it has gone to the last stage of
* * emergency power for communication and navigation," Dr. Arvind
* * Sinha, director of aerospace at RMIT University in Melbourne, told
* * the Sydney Morning Herald. "After that it comes down to the skill
* * and experience of the crew." He added that the loss of all four
* * generators is "unheard of" but Murphy can and does find a way,
* * this time through a sink with a clogged drain in the first class
* * galley. ...

* * The sink is right over the electrical distribution unit and Boeing
* * engineers evidently considered the potential for leaks when they
* * put it there. A drip tray is installed to catch any overflow from
* * the sink but the tray on this aircraft was cracked.

Did you really need to post it twice? And we know it wasn't an accident
because you've got 2 different pre-post comments.

Now for the guys with "Heavy" experience. Does the 747 really only have
enough onboard battery power to last a little over an hour for the
flight deck?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, that's about all the time the batteries will last.

Dean

On Jan 10, 3:14*pm, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote:

Now for the guys with "Heavy" experience. Does the 747 really only have
enough onboard battery power to last a little over an hour for the
flight deck?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

About an hour depending on the model, BUT, they can just start the APU
and this would run at least one of the main busses.
Frank

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:14:01 -0600, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote in
:

Did you really need to post it twice?

I canceled the first article, and re-posted it with additional
information.

You're welcome.

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:39:25 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:14:01 -0600, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote in
:

Did you really need to post it twice?

I canceled the first article, and re-posted it with additional
information.

You're welcome.

The vast majority of news servers stopped honoring cancel messages
yonks ago due to abuse.

Does the apu power go through the same distribution panel connected with
the problem?

F. Baum wrote:

On Jan 10, 3:14 pm, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote:

Now for the guys with "Heavy" experience. Does the 747 really only have
enough onboard battery power to last a little over an hour for the
flight deck?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


About an hour depending on the model, BUT, they can just start the APU
and this would run at least one of the main busses.
Frank

On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:13:46 -0800 (PST), "F. Baum"
wrote in
:

On Jan 10, 2:37*pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
Fortunately the flight wasn't mid-Pacific when this occurred:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/travel/cr...08/11995546542...
* * Crash threat

* * January 9, 2008

* * A Qantas 747 with 344 passengers on board could have faced
* * catastrophe after losing power from all four of its generators on
* * its descent into Bangkok on Monday.

Lar, This story doesnt make a whole lotta sense and seems a bit too
dramatic ("Could have faced catasophe"?). I wouldnt believe everything
on Avweb.
Frank

If you'll notice, it's The Sydney Morning Herald that contained that
quote, not AvWeb.

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:14:01 -0600, Gig 601XL Builder
wrote in
:

Did you really need to post it twice?

I canceled the first article, and re-posted it with additional
information.

You're welcome.



You really ought to know that there isn't a mainstream news server on
the planet that still accepts cancel commands.