A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 10th 07, 10:26 PM posted to us.military.army,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,us.military.navy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

Despite denials, Pentagon plans for possible attack on nuclear sites
are well advanced

Ewen MacAskill in Washington
Saturday February 10, 2007
The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,2010086,00.html...

Stop the Coming Iran War (for Israel) Before It Starts:

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=67774

Ads
  #3  
Old February 11th 07, 06:18 PM posted to us.military.army,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,us.military.navy
Mark Test
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

wrote in message
oups.com...
Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

Despite denials, Pentagon plans for possible attack on nuclear sites
are well advanced

Ewen MacAskill in Washington
Saturday February 10, 2007
The Guardian

Hey nomorewar.....what are you doing to prevent Iran from
buildings nukes? It seems to me you want Iran to go nuclear....

Do you really believe Iran has peaceful intentions? We all lose
if the mid-east goes nuclear....

Mark



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #4  
Old February 12th 07, 11:24 AM posted to us.military.army,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,us.military.navy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

On 2月11日, 上午6时26分, wrote:
Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

Despite denials, Pentagon plans for possible attack on nuclear sites
are well advanced

Ewen MacAskill in Washington
Saturday February 10, 2007
The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,2010086,00.html...

Stop the Coming Iran War (for Israel) Before It Starts:

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=67774


really? I don` t think the US will attack Iran.Iran has a powerful
army after all.
If the US attack Iron ,Iron might use the missle attack the base or
the carrier of United States.
I don`t think Americans like to see this situation

  #5  
Old February 12th 07, 08:11 PM posted to us.military.army,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,us.military.navy
David Nicholls
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

The mid-east is already nuclear (Isreal) - it is the appearance of a balance
that appears to worry the US.

David

"Mark Test" wrote in message
.. .
wrote in message
oups.com...
Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

Despite denials, Pentagon plans for possible attack on nuclear sites
are well advanced

Ewen MacAskill in Washington
Saturday February 10, 2007
The Guardian

Hey nomorewar.....what are you doing to prevent Iran from
buildings nukes? It seems to me you want Iran to go nuclear....

Do you really believe Iran has peaceful intentions? We all lose
if the mid-east goes nuclear....

Mark



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com



  #6  
Old February 12th 07, 08:40 PM posted to us.military.army,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,us.military.navy
Defendario
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

Mark Test wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

Despite denials, Pentagon plans for possible attack on nuclear sites
are well advanced

Ewen MacAskill in Washington
Saturday February 10, 2007
The Guardian

Hey nomorewar.....what are you doing to prevent Iran from
buildings nukes? It seems to me you want Iran to go nuclear....


Why not? No nation can consider itself truly free without the Atomic
bomb, or so Charles DeGaulle thought.

He was right.

Do you really believe Iran has peaceful intentions? We all lose
if the mid-east goes nuclear....


Little****tystan is nuclear. Pakistan and India are too, and not far
away at all. Some say the KSA is cryptonuclear armed, and some fSoviet
Republics as well.

Frankly just about everyone in the region has WMD of some sort or other,
except the Iraqis. Of course, that's who we attacked.

I wonder why...NOT!

;D

Mark




  #7  
Old February 12th 07, 10:00 PM posted to us.military.army,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,us.military.navy
Michael Wise
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

In article ,
"David Nicholls" wrote:

The mid-east is already nuclear (Isreal) - it is the appearance of a balance
that appears to worry the US.


That and the fact that officials in the Iranian government (from the top
down) have repeatedly made public comments that various countries (such
as Israel) should be wiped off the map.


--Mike



David

"Mark Test" wrote in message
.. .
wrote in message
oups.com...
Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

Despite denials, Pentagon plans for possible attack on nuclear sites
are well advanced

Ewen MacAskill in Washington
Saturday February 10, 2007
The Guardian

Hey nomorewar.....what are you doing to prevent Iran from
buildings nukes? It seems to me you want Iran to go nuclear....

Do you really believe Iran has peaceful intentions? We all lose
if the mid-east goes nuclear....

Mark



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #8  
Old February 12th 07, 10:34 PM posted to us.military.army,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,us.military.navy
Defendario
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

Michael Wise wrote:
In article ,
"David Nicholls" wrote:

The mid-east is already nuclear (Isreal) - it is the appearance of a balance
that appears to worry the US.


That and the fact that officials in the Iranian government (from the top
down) have repeatedly made public comments that various countries (such
as Israel) should be wiped off the map.


You make that sound like a *bad* thing...
:-\


--Mike


David

"Mark Test" wrote in message
.. .
wrote in message
oups.com...
Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

Despite denials, Pentagon plans for possible attack on nuclear sites
are well advanced

Ewen MacAskill in Washington
Saturday February 10, 2007
The Guardian

Hey nomorewar.....what are you doing to prevent Iran from
buildings nukes? It seems to me you want Iran to go nuclear....

Do you really believe Iran has peaceful intentions? We all lose
if the mid-east goes nuclear....

Mark



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com



  #9  
Old February 13th 07, 12:02 AM posted to us.military.army,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,us.military.navy
Michael Wise
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

In article ,
Defendario wrote:

Michael Wise wrote:
In article ,
"David Nicholls" wrote:

The mid-east is already nuclear (Isreal) - it is the appearance of a
balance
that appears to worry the US.


That and the fact that officials in the Iranian government (from the top
down) have repeatedly made public comments that various countries (such
as Israel) should be wiped off the map.


You make that sound like a *bad* thing...



Are you saying that the guaranteed nuclear counter response and
resulting regional death, destruction, and nuclear fallout around the
world are good things?


--Mike
  #10  
Old February 13th 07, 12:34 AM posted to us.military.army,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,us.military.navy
Defendario
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring

Michael Wise wrote:
In article ,
Defendario wrote:

Michael Wise wrote:
In article ,
"David Nicholls" wrote:

The mid-east is already nuclear (Isreal) - it is the appearance of a
balance
that appears to worry the US.
That and the fact that officials in the Iranian government (from the top
down) have repeatedly made public comments that various countries (such
as Israel) should be wiped off the map.

You make that sound like a *bad* thing...



Are you saying that the guaranteed nuclear counter response and
resulting regional death, destruction, and nuclear fallout around the
world are good things?


Iran will recover, but IsReeL will not.

And that, of course, would be a *good* *thing*


--Mike


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iran: Pieces in Place for Escalation/"The fuel for a fire is in place" [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 January 21st 07 08:02 PM
Major investment bank issues warning on strike against Iran [email protected] Naval Aviation 0 January 16th 07 03:34 AM
Crime of the Century: Are Bush & Cheney Planning Early Attack on Iran? [email protected] Naval Aviation 7 December 29th 06 12:42 AM
Bush Iran War Plans - 4 Strike Groups in the Persian Gulf Airyx Naval Aviation 13 November 1st 06 01:08 AM
Bush administration finalizes military attack on Iran [email protected] Naval Aviation 11 January 5th 06 09:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.