Modern aces

Associate asked interesting question.

Is there any kind of listing of "modern" jet aces? And are any of those
in service today?

I'd guess best bet are the Israelis. Elsewhere some are from Vietnam
(US, Vietnam, Russian?) and what else?

There was air to air fighting at Eritrean-Etiopian war but I'd dare to
guess that total losses can be counted with one hand?

I'd limit the list to piloted aircraft also (no missiles, drones or
choppers).

jok

Associate asked interesting question.

Is there any kind of listing of "modern" jet aces? And are any of those
in service today?

I'd guess best bet are the Israelis. Elsewhere some are from Vietnam
(US, Vietnam, Russian?) and what else?

jok

There are several websites and a number of books. The Israelis have over 35
pilots who qualify as ace with scores from 5 to 17. There last ace probably
qualfied in the early 1980's. Some of them are certainly still in the reserves
if not active duty. Giora Even who scored 17 was still flying reserve fighter
missions in the F-16 in his late 50s just a few years ago.

There are apparently quite a number of aces in Iran from the war against Iraq.
I am not sure how historians or other experts greet their claims which are
apparently only recently known in the west.

The US had two pilot aces in Vietnam, one Navy and one Air Force each claiming
five and three Weapons Officers two Air Force and one Navy. As important as
the rear seater is in a two seat fighter aircraft there is to me something a
little disengenuous about crediting them as aces. For example both Navy aces
flew together as a team. To compare their claims at first glance it seems they
downed ten aircraft together and there is a photo of thier aircraft with ten
victory markings but in fact together they only destroyed five. Of the Air
Forces Weapons Officer aces one scored four with the one pilot ace.

The Vietnamese had at least a dozen aces and maybe more. The Vietnamese did
include drones in thier victory claims. At least one Vietnamese ace has had
his 7 claims studied and there is a corresponding American loss for every
claim.

I don't think there is a valid claim for a fighter ace since the early 1980s.
For Desert Storm and the campaigns over the Balkans the highest total appears
to be 3. For the Fleet Air Arm in the Falklands I think the highest score was
4.

One last area is the Peruvian aerial drug smuggling interdiction campaign where
dozens of aircraft have been shot down. I hardly think this qualifies as air
combat though.

John Dupre'

(JDupre5762) wrote in
:


One last area is the Peruvian aerial drug smuggling interdiction
campaign where dozens of aircraft have been shot down. I hardly
think this qualifies as air combat though.

An interesting note on that:


http://lacc.fiu.edu/PUBLICATIONS_res...vol6num2/menze
l.html

"A two year tally by early 1992 indicated that some 124 aircraft
had been reported as shot down (out of an estimated total of
some 2,000 flights) and things were thought to be going
reasonably well until May 1992, when the Peruvian Air Force
shot down one of SOUTHCOM's C-130s on a clandestine
reconnaissance mission."


Regards...

The US had two pilot aces in Vietnam, one Navy and one Air Force each
claiming
five and three Weapons Officers two Air Force and one Navy. As important
as
the rear seater is in a two seat fighter aircraft there is to me something
a
little disengenuous about crediting them as aces. For example both Navy
aces
flew together as a team. To compare their claims at first glance it seems
they
downed ten aircraft together and there is a photo of thier aircraft with
ten
victory markings but in fact together they only destroyed five.

Well, the RIO gets the same grave or prison cell if you screw up. It seems
only fair he shares the credit for the kills. A good RIO is worth his
weight in gold. A fair to middlin' one isn't worth 300 pounds of JP. I've
experienced both.

I've never seen a publicity shot of the Cunningham/Driscoll jet with ten
kills displayed, just the five.

R / John

Howdy John.


I've never seen a publicity shot of the Cunningham/Driscoll jet with ten
kills displayed, just the five.


neither have I - if it was painted that way, chances are that it was for a
one-time photo op. Cunningham's jet is portrayed in flight at the San Diego
Aerospace Museum, trailing a suspended MiG 17 in NVN colors - Duke's bird is
painted with five stars, just the way I have seen in VN air war books.

v/r
Gordon
====(A+C====
USN SAR

Donate your memories - write a note on the back and send your old photos to a
reputable museum, don't take them with you when you're gone.

From: "John Carrier"

For example both Navy
aces
flew together as a team. To compare their claims at first glance it seems
they
downed ten aircraft together and there is a photo of thier aircraft with
ten
victory markings but in fact
together they only destroyed five.

Well, the RIO gets the same grave or prison cell if you screw up. It seems
only fair he shares the credit for the kills. A good RIO is worth his
weight in gold. A fair to middlin' one isn't worth 300 pounds of JP. I've
experienced both.

All true I am sure and it is a trivial thing compared to all that a combat
aircrew must deal with and be prepared for to question how victory claims are
credited or painted on an aircraft. Certainly the RIO deserves credit. I
gather that early in the war the Air Force credited each one of a two man crew
ony half credit for each victory so that for many years Robin Olds was
officially credited for only 4 half victories. I suppose there is no way of
establishing credit that would please everyone and certainly the crews actually
involved know best who deserves it.

I've never seen a publicity shot of the Cunningham/Driscoll jet with ten
kills displayed, just the five.


I checked my books and found the photo but it shows Cunningham and Driscoll in
an F-4 with 8 victory markings. This is a signed photo to the author Chris
Shores. The markings are small Vietnamese flags and are on the right side of
the aircraft. Maybe these are the kill markings credited to an individual
aircraft? The photo doesn't show bureau numbers though the tactical number
seems to start with 10..... and is from the book Air Aces

John Dupre'

(JDupre5762) wrote:
From: "John Carrier"

For example both Navy
aces
flew together as a team. To compare their
claims at first glance it seems
they
downed ten aircraft together and there is
a photo of thier aircraft with
ten
victory markings but in fact
together they only destroyed five.

Well, the RIO gets the same grave or prison
cell if you screw up. It seems
only fair he shares the credit for the kills.
A good RIO is worth his
weight in gold. A fair to middlin' one isn't
worth 300 pounds of JP. I've
experienced both.

All true I am sure and it is a trivial thing
compared to all that a combat
aircrew must deal with and be prepared for to
question how victory claims are
credited or painted on an aircraft. Certainly
the RIO deserves credit. I
gather that early in the war the Air Force credited
each one of a two man crew
ony half credit for each victory so that for
many years Robin Olds was
officially credited for only 4 half victories.
I suppose there is no way of
establishing credit that would please everyone
and certainly the crews actually
involved know best who deserves it.

I've never seen a publicity shot of the Cunningham/Driscoll
jet with ten
kills displayed, just the five.


I checked my books and found the photo but it
shows Cunningham and Driscoll in
an F-4 with 8 victory markings. This is a signed
photo to the author Chris
Shores. The markings are small Vietnamese flags
and are on the right side of
the aircraft. Maybe these are the kill markings
credited to an individual
aircraft? The photo doesn't show bureau numbers
though the tactical number
seems to start with 10..... and is from the
book Air Aces

John Dupre'


I've seen that picture in The Hook magazine; those kill flags refer to
all kills scored by their squadron, VF-96.

Posted via www.My-Newsgroups.com - web to news gateway for usenet access!

On 10 Jan 2004 02:45:01 GMT, (JDupre5762) wrote:

Certainly the RIO deserves credit.

In WWI fighters, especiallly the early ones, the gunner was the man
who shot down the enemy aircraft, and he was credited with the kill
along with the pilot.

Having demonstrated their quick reflexes and immunity to air sickness,
some (perhaps many) of these men were re-trained as pilots. (It didn't
take long--a few weeks, with due allowance for England's unfriendly
flying weather.)

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com

(JDupre5762) wrote in message ...
Associate asked interesting question.

Is there any kind of listing of "modern" jet aces? And are any of those
in service today?

I'd guess best bet are the Israelis. Elsewhere some are from Vietnam
(US, Vietnam, Russian?) and what else?

jok

There are several websites and a number of books. The Israelis have over 35
pilots who qualify as ace with scores from 5 to 17. There last ace probably
qualfied in the early 1980's. Some of them are certainly still in the reserves
if not active duty. Giora Even who scored 17 was still flying reserve fighter
missions in the F-16 in his late 50s just a few years ago.

There are apparently quite a number of aces in Iran from the war against Iraq.
I am not sure how historians or other experts greet their claims which are
apparently only recently known in the west.

The US had two pilot aces in Vietnam, one Navy and one Air Force each claiming
five and three Weapons Officers two Air Force and one Navy. As important as
the rear seater is in a two seat fighter aircraft there is to me something a
little disengenuous about crediting them as aces. For example both Navy aces
flew together as a team. To compare their claims at first glance it seems they
downed ten aircraft together and there is a photo of thier aircraft with ten
victory markings but in fact together they only destroyed five.

This is more than likely the score of all of VF-96 that you're seeing
displayed, not just Cunningham and Driscoll's score.

~Michael

To compare their claims at first glance it seems they
downed ten aircraft together and there is a photo of thier aircraft with
ten
victory markings but in fact together they only destroyed five.


This is more than likely the score of all of VF-96 that you're seeing
displayed, not just Cunningham and Driscoll's score.

From: (Michael)

Thanks, that would explain it. I found the photo and it actually shows 8
Vietnamese flags on the right hand splitter plate with Cunningham and Driscoll
in their respective seats.

John Dupre'