Flying Mag Clueless about LPV and NACO

Anyone else pick up the bit in the May issue where the editor and
Richard Collins slam NACO's charting of LPV IAPs, yet those guys are
clueless about the NACO designation of the P-FAF with their traditional
lightening bolt?

Sam Spade wrote:
Anyone else pick up the bit in the May issue where the editor and
Richard Collins slam NACO's charting of LPV IAPs, yet those guys are
clueless about the NACO designation of the P-FAF with their traditional
lightening bolt?


I did.

However, it didn't make all that much sense to me, as most all of my
experience is with NACO plates, and they make sense to me. Lacking the
experience and reference point with Jepp plates, I simply turned the page.

B A R R Y wrote:
Sam Spade wrote:

Anyone else pick up the bit in the May issue where the editor and
Richard Collins slam NACO's charting of LPV IAPs, yet those guys are
clueless about the NACO designation of the P-FAF with their
traditional lightening bolt?



I did.

However, it didn't make all that much sense to me, as most all of my
experience is with NACO plates, and they make sense to me. Lacking the
experience and reference point with Jepp plates, I simply turned the page.

Their bone was with NACO LPV charts because they don't understand NACO's
way of portraying the P-FAF with a lightening bolt. Apparently you
do. Also, apparently a lot of their readers don't.

"Sam Spade" wrote in message


Their bone was with NACO LPV charts because they don't understand
NACO's way of portraying the P-FAF with a lightening bolt. Apparently you
do. Also, apparently a lot of their readers don't.

What's the demographic of the typical "Flying" reader?

--
John T
http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer
http://sage1solutions.com/products
NEW! FlyteBalance v2.0 (W&B); FlyteLog v2.0 (Logbook)
____________________

John T wrote:
"Sam Spade" wrote in message


Their bone was with NACO LPV charts because they don't understand
NACO's way of portraying the P-FAF with a lightening bolt. Apparently you
do. Also, apparently a lot of their readers don't.


What's the demographic of the typical "Flying" reader?

Armchair pilots I suppose.

In article , says...


John T wrote:
"Sam Spade" wrote in message


Their bone was with NACO LPV charts because they don't understand
NACO's way of portraying the P-FAF with a lightening bolt. Apparently you
do. Also, apparently a lot of their readers don't.


What's the demographic of the typical "Flying" reader?

Armchair pilots I suppose.


Sincerely doubt it.
Why don't you write to them instead of writing about it here?
Pilots are supposed to be goal oriented - only balloon pilots are hot winded. .
..

(I'm like Mac on this one - only use Jepp charts so I have no idea how off the
wall you are on this. Write to them directly and you are sure to win your
reward or meet your match.)

On Apr 28, 8:29*am, Sam Spade wrote:
John T wrote:
"Sam Spade" wrote in message


Their bone was with NACO LPV charts because they don't understand
NACO's way of portraying the P-FAF with a lightening bolt. Apparently you
do. *Also, apparently a lot of their readers don't.

What's the demographic of the typical "Flying" reader?

Armchair pilots I suppose.

Not a chance. However, I do suspect that the average reader is
probably pretty old. I'd love to read Flying Mag but with a career,
family ,etc there is no chance that the issue will even get cracked
anymore.

-Robert