A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is there a problem with rah?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old February 7th 07, 02:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Dan[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 465
Default Is there a problem with rah?

Richard Riley wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:38:43 -0600, Dan wrote:

Montblack wrote:
("ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote)
OK,OK OK you guys all I'm gonna say is MOSES was my first flight
instructor and he was tough.Kept hitting me with a big stick when I screwd
up :-)

Q: When instructing, and Moses wants the plane back, what does he say?

A: "Let my Piper go!"

I heard back then the (PTS) "...has given unto you these fifteen... [oops!]
Oy! Ten! Ten commandments for all to obey!"

http://www.faa.gov/education_researc...est_standards/


Montblack


Y'know, I may wind up regretting having started all this


You don't regret it yet?!


OK, OK, so I'm a masochist.

Send in the Nuns!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAVJ9ZyghlA


No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #42  
Old February 7th 07, 02:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
John Price
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default Is there a problem with rah?


Last I saw it it was almost done but it was way short on wing area IMHO. Had
plenty of room tho' :-)

Chuck

Noah translated into English is Moller.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired



Speaking of, . . . A promo for an pcoming PBS show started off with about
2 second shot of the Moller flying!, It's amazing what they can do with
special effects. I wonder if they can make the worlds smallest jet fly?
John
Ducking ;-)

  #43  
Old February 7th 07, 03:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Dan[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 465
Default Is there a problem with rah?

John Price wrote:
Last I saw it it was almost done but it was way short on wing area IMHO. Had
plenty of room tho' :-)

Chuck

Noah translated into English is Moller.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired



Speaking of, . . . A promo for an pcoming PBS show started off with about
2 second shot of the Moller flying!, It's amazing what they can do with
special effects. I wonder if they can make the worlds smallest jet fly?
John
Ducking ;-)


It already has flies.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #44  
Old February 7th 07, 12:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
ChuckSlusarczyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 216
Default Is there a problem with rah?

In article , Dan says...

Send in the Nuns!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAVJ9ZyghlA


No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!


Bring out ..gasp!! the comfy chair!!!bigger gasp!!

Chuck ( IT"S ) S

  #45  
Old February 7th 07, 04:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 217
Default Is there a problem with rah?

On Feb 6, 7:55 am, "TigerPilot" wrote:
Usually after a particularly nasty flamefest between a few members, many
people are unwilling to continue reading, so they don't read and don't post.


Give it a couple weeks.


Flamefests, as "righteous" as they may be, damage the group. Just my
opinion.
--
Jim in NC


You are so right, Jim. In the late 90th, this group used to be the
most active group of them all. After some people joined that only had
mayhem on their mind it dwindled down to barely active. It never
really recoverd from that.


Oh, THAT's what happened. I thought they deviated from
the plans and all augered in on their test flights...

--

FF


  #46  
Old February 7th 07, 09:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 146
Default Is there a problem with rah?


wrote

Oh, THAT's what happened. I thought they deviated from
the plans and all augered in on their test flights...


Cute :-)
--
Jim in NC
  #47  
Old February 8th 07, 04:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Whome?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Is there a problem with rah?

On 2/5/2007 8:50:55 AM, ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article 2gGxh.1016$Yl3.973@trndny09, Jerry Springer says...

Maybe all is not known about airplanes but I sure don't care if I ever
see the words juan or zoom again. I know that most of the people I know
that read this newsgroup are tired of hearing about them over and over
and over again. The same things are hashed over and over and over
about them. It gets really tedious reading about them. I know, change my
browser to ignore them or don't read it but it is still get aggravating
to see the same subjects all the time.


In a way that's exactly what zoom wants,he wants everyone to forget what he has
done to people for the last 20 years. He backs off and waits until a new group
of newbies show up who are unaware of his past and then he can play hero all
over again.

I realize that for some, this fight gets old but it's a necessary fight. To
expose zoom is to protect newbies ,be they readers or advertizers from what zoom
will do time and time again. To readers he will portray himself as the next
coming of Chuck Yeager and a super hero who has done and flown all things
aeronautical. Newbies will take him at face value and think he's super pilot.
All wonderful and full of goodness.When in fact he's a phony.

Newbie advertizers will soon learn that if you start to advertize with him he
will run ads you didn't want and bill you for them .If you don't pay up he'll
sue you, something that Liberty Aerospace and ControlVision are now involved
in.I bet now they wish they knew about zoom's tactics before they started
advertizing with ANN .

So there is a reason for all this whether you agree or not is your decision but
I hold no grief with those who don't find it of interest. Usually it only
interests those who have been zoomed :-)

See ya

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret


Sorry Chuck, but Jerry is right. 99% of that stuff has just become either
feeding Juan the troll, or Campbell stuff that is so far off topic it just
doesn't belong here. Everone here realizes where that pair is coming from,
give the rest of us a break.
  #48  
Old February 8th 07, 12:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Mark Hickey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 61
Default Is there a problem with rah?

"Whome?" wrote:

Sorry Chuck, but Jerry is right. 99% of that stuff has just become either
feeding Juan the troll, or Campbell stuff that is so far off topic it just
doesn't belong here. Everone here realizes where that pair is coming from,
give the rest of us a break.


Is it time for a full and official shunning of both, forever? In
truth, nothing would torque them off more than being assigned
"irrelevant status". It's kinda fun to picture yawn jumping up and
yapping, looking for attention and getting not a key click in reply.

Mark Hickey
  #49  
Old February 8th 07, 01:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Whome?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Is there a problem with rah?

On 2/8/2007 6:55:35 AM, Mark Hickey wrote:

Is it time for a full and official shunning of both, forever? In
truth, nothing would torque them off more than being assigned
"irrelevant status". It's kinda fun to picture yawn jumping up and
yapping, looking for attention and getting not a key click in reply.

Mark Hickey


You've got my vote, them or anything about them. I actually enjoy playing
*Pac Juan*. The first thing I do is highlight and delete anything with Juan's
name or it, before I ever open it. I also delete the entire thread on things
like *Sebering and Hitlaw*, and *Monkey in a Flight Suit* or whatever it was.
This causes all those messages to float to the top for easy deletion without
opening them.

It's amazing how much better this group looks with all the nonsense cut out
of it, and how little we actually talk about aircraft and building
techniques. I know if I were a newcomer, I'd be scared to death to ask a
question.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So...about that plane on the treadmill... Ray Piloting 135 December 18th 06 10:30 PM
Problem with Unison Lasar Ignition hmoser Home Built 2 December 2nd 06 02:10 PM
Mooney Engine Problem in Flight - Advise Paul Smedshammer Owning 17 December 21st 04 06:39 AM
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) Snowbird Owning 77 December 3rd 03 09:10 PM
Problem: Ground Speed Estimate with Volkslogger and WinPilot RamyYanetz Soaring 3 August 26th 03 03:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.