If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Glenfiddich
wrote: On 21 May 2004 19:14:11 GMT, (B2431) wrote: I have seen phased array aircraft radars that look as if they still mechanically sweep the dish. I thought the entire reason for phased arrays was so they wouldn't need to mechanically move. I know how phased arrays work in principle, but that's as far as I go. What am I missing here? A flat phased array antenna can instantly swing its beam electronically to point *anywhere* ahead but can NOT look 'behind' the plane of the antenna array. And its efficiency falls off as it squints to extreme port or starboard... Therefore, to get 'all-round' coverage you either add more arrays (facing left, right and rear, as you see on the bridge structure of many modern ships) - or physically swing the one antenna you already have. Adding a turntable to a single antenna sounds like an engineer's answer to the design problem. A simple, robust rotator, being very 'old-tech', is probably a lot cheaper and more reliable than 3 more arrays... OK for big platforms like AWACS or E-2C, but problematic for fast-movers. From an engineering standpoint... -- Harry Andreas Engineering raconteur |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "The
Enlightenment" wrote: Some phased arrays rotate but and are only phase steered in the vertical for height finding purposes. For instance the antenna on US AWACS aircraft use this technique, though the Israeli AWACS use fixed antena inside the dome. This technique goes back to the 2nd world war. (I think the German radars Wassermann and Jagdschloss used it as did the radars for the Soviet missiles SA1 and SA2) Alternatively and cluster of 4 antena as seen on the USN Aegis system can be used. There must be great difficulty in integrating the 4 antena to work together. Having a phased array is pretty important these days. Modern fighter tactics involve splitting in such a way that the enemy can not track the multiple targets with a mechanical antenna anymore and using this as an opportunity to attack. As with most things, there are pro's and con's. AESAs let you track more targets effectively instantly, when the nose is pointed in the right direction. But a mechanically scanned array has a larger off-boresite look angle. Above statements for fighter aircraft, not surveillance types. -- Harry Andreas Engineering raconteur |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[AU] Light plane sparked terror alert | David Bromage | Military Aviation | 41 | September 11th 03 05:37 PM |