Logging time in a P51D?

"Michael" wrote in message
om...
Therefore, one can log PIC time without an LOA, in the same way that
one can log PIC time in a taildragger without having a tailwheel
endorsement. One simply can't act as PIC.

If the other guy is an insructor then I guess you could log it as
Pu/t (pilot under training) or whatever it's called in the US.
That would be quite cool. A "lesson" in a P51!

Paul

"Jack" wrote in message
...
And you can't make your criticisms more appropriate by putting two
spaces after a period instead of one, as though you were still using a
typewriter.

"You're an asshole". Now, that's a criticism. I was just offering an
observation. I find it pretty funny when people add extra question marks
and exclamation points, for the reason I already stated.

As for the extra space, you mean you aren't reading this using a
fixed-spaced font? How do you enjoy all the wonderful sig art then?

-- "You're an asshole".
shouldn't that be
"You're an asshole."

Peter Duniho wrote:

"Jack" wrote in message
...

And you can't make your criticisms more appropriate by putting two
spaces after a period instead of one, as though you were still using a
typewriter.


"You're an asshole". Now, that's a criticism. I was just offering an
observation. I find it pretty funny when people add extra question marks
and exclamation points, for the reason I already stated.

As for the extra space, you mean you aren't reading this using a
fixed-spaced font? How do you enjoy all the wonderful sig art then?

Thanks to everyone,
I had the same problems going through the FAR's and the section on
LOA's.
It wasn't an hour of dual but I don't really care because I don't need
any hours for further checkrides or ratings. Regardless of anything
else it was a dream flight out over the Sierras to Lake Tahoe. There
is nothing like excess power to make flying fun. That whole flight is
burned into my memory. I logged it for the memory, and for total
time. I definitely agree with the post below, I am lucky, and I have
great friends. Now I have to go work on the guy with a Stearman and
another one with a 1929 Bellanca.
M. Grinnin


"Bushy" wrote

Who cares how you log it?

Lucky C...
;)

Peter

"Matt Young" wrote in message
ink.net...
-- "You're an asshole".
shouldn't that be
"You're an asshole."

No.

According to my grammar handbook and any style guides available online,
periods always go inside closing quotation marks.

http://www.english.uiuc.edu/cws/wwor...ons.htm&e=7370

With that, I hope to never discuss grammar on an aviation newsgroup
again. I'll try to remember that there are those on here who think that
correspondence on here should always be in formal style.

Peter Duniho wrote:

"Matt Young" wrote in message
ink.net...

-- "You're an asshole".
shouldn't that be
"You're an asshole."


No.

"Matt Young" wrote in message
ink.net...
According to my grammar handbook and any style guides available online,
periods always go inside closing quotation marks.

"Any style guides available online"? Really? You've read every single one?

Interesting. In any case, a) you are referring only to the American
"standard" usage, and b) it's based on out-dated typographical needs (to
protect delicate periods and commas from wear and tear during the printing
process). You didn't even bother to ask whether I learned English in the
US, or elsewhere where a different standard is used.

Many people, in the US and including myself, find the logical British
convention more compelling and use that instead. This is the way of the
future, and I choose to be there earlier than the laggards.

Pete

Many people, in the US and including myself, find the logical British
convention more compelling and use that instead. This is the way of the
future, and I choose to be there earlier than the laggards.


You are the first I have ever seen.


-John
*You are nothing until you have flown a Douglas, Lockheed, Grumman or North
American*