If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Known Icing requirements
I'm a little confused as to the requirements that an aircraft must meet
to launch into known icing conditions. To further add to my confusion, the regulatory requirements (may be just the interpretation of?) has changed over the years. My personal situation, I own a '69 Aztec (D model) and 1974 the aircraft had received an STC for "Flight into known icing conditions". The STC included the follow: de-ice boots on the main wings outboard of the engines only de-ice boots on all the tail feathers heated anti-ice (?) pads for both props hot plate (anti-ice) for the windshield In addition the Pitot tube is heated (static port is on the pitot tube so its heated too). The STC specifically says (wording is from memory however) "Approved for flight into known icing conditions" and then gives the severity of the icing encounters as "occasional light to moderate". It further goes on to list what equipment must be working and installed to meet the certification, otherwise if anything is not working or installed, I need to place a plaque saying that flight into know icing conditions is prohibited. I guess the questions are, 1) if the testing for the STC was to be done all over again today, would this aircraft succeed? or is todays certification process for icing so much tougher that it wouldn't pass? 2) What is occasional? less than 1/2 hr in icing conditions? Just long enough to climb or descend through it? 3) Reading through an article on known icing aircraft requirements recently published by AOPA (ASF?) it was said that a heated stall warning switch was also required, I do not have one, and its not listed as a requirement in the STC. thanks... Jeff |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeffrey Ross" wrote in message ... I'm a little confused as to the requirements that an aircraft must meet to launch into known icing conditions. To further add to my confusion, the regulatory requirements (may be just the interpretation of?) has changed over the years. My personal situation, I own a '69 Aztec (D model) and 1974 the aircraft had received an STC for "Flight into known icing conditions". The STC included the follow: de-ice boots on the main wings outboard of the engines only de-ice boots on all the tail feathers heated anti-ice (?) pads for both props hot plate (anti-ice) for the windshield In addition the Pitot tube is heated (static port is on the pitot tube so its heated too). The STC specifically says (wording is from memory however) "Approved for flight into known icing conditions" and then gives the severity of the icing encounters as "occasional light to moderate". This is fairly common, very few airplanes are approved for flight into severe icicng. It further goes on to list what equipment must be working and installed to meet the certification, otherwise if anything is not working or installed, I need to place a plaque saying that flight into know icing conditions is prohibited. I guess the questions are, 1) if the testing for the STC was to be done all over again today, would this aircraft succeed? or is todays certification process for icing so much tougher that it wouldn't pass? The test is done be conducting a flight for a certain time into a certain droplet size icing to simulate stratiform clouds and then again into larger droplets to simulate cumulus clouds. AFAIK the test has not changed for many years. 2) What is occasional? less than 1/2 hr in icing conditions? Just long enough to climb or descend through it? I think that occasional is defined in weather info (maybe in the AIM) as being less than half the time but you can look it up. 3) Reading through an article on known icing aircraft requirements recently published by AOPA (ASF?) it was said that a heated stall warning switch was also required, I do not have one, and its not listed as a requirement in the STC. This may very well be true but should not really concern you since the stall warning system does not accurately predict a stall on an iced up airplane. The airplane will stall at a higher speed with ice and different portions of the wing or tail may stall first depending on the shape and amount of ice. Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Icing Airmets | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 51 | March 3rd 04 01:20 AM |
FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 07:44 PM |
Supercooled Water - More on Icing | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 50 | December 11th 03 01:20 PM |
FAR 91.157 Operating in icing conditions | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 98 | December 11th 03 06:58 AM |
Overly restrictive business flying requirements. | Wily Wapiti | Owning | 53 | August 25th 03 11:34 PM |