If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why turbo normalizer?
This started on a Mooney list. I cannot for the life of me (and an
engineering degree) figure out why a turbo normalizer would be any easier on an engine than a regular turbo. Is this just marketing crap from the turbo normalizer people? Turbo'd engines cost more to run because of the increased stress on the cylinders, rings, etc do to the pressure. Running an engine at 30MP when outside is 20" is just as much pressure difference as running at 40MP when outside is 30". It seems like the turbo norm crowd is trying to confuse people. Unless the entire engine was pressurized to 30", you should expect turbo style stressed on your engine when running 30" when outside is 20". This is *much* different than running 30" when outside is 30" (down low). Am I missing something? -Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Duo Discus Turbo - Texas, USA | Mark Zivley | Soaring | 2 | May 4th 05 11:34 PM |
turbo stc? | The Weiss Family | Owning | 21 | October 3rd 04 10:35 PM |
Turbo prop AT-6/SNJ? | frank may | Military Aviation | 11 | September 5th 04 02:51 PM |
Turbo 182: correct mixture for final approach at high altitude? | Barry Klein | Piloting | 38 | January 15th 04 03:25 AM |
A36 Bonanza turbo prop | Jeff | Owning | 46 | January 7th 04 02:37 PM |