If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?
"Morgans" wrote in message ... "Rocketeer" wrote Why yes, sailplanes! And there is a sailplane port not far from here. And NO MEDICAL REQUIRED!! Not for student or pilot. Thanks for making me look that up! But if they sent me the certified letter, is that for ONLY powered planes? I will have to have them answer that one for me cause the letter sounded awful hard against any flying. There is a gotcha in the sport pilot rating, in that there is no medical required IF you have not been turned down at your last FAA medical. That is your condition, so no sport pilot for you. For sailplanes, there is NO medical of any kind required for it. It does not matter if you have been turned down in the past. You are self certifying, before every flight, that you have no condition that is going to cause a safety problem during that flight. It would seem to me, that is your only catch. You must be honest enough to be aware of your limitations. The sailplane ticket also allow for self launch, or motor gliders. There are definitions that have to be met to call it a motor glider, but at least with an engine, you can go somewhere when the lift is marginal. Here is a link with most of the vital information. http://webpages.charter.net/engreenwell/ASA/Motorglider_criteria_2004.pdf -- Jim in NC You also have FAR part 103 ultralights, and one other possibility for you depending on your condition. If it wasn't done during the intital attempt at getting a medical, and I doubt it was in that Light Sport is very new, you can ask that they review your medical certification again for Light Sport only. It wouldn't be a 3rd class, but a review to see if you could safely operate an LSA. Many homebuilts can fall into that category. To deal with these types of issues AOPA is the place to call and ask for the medical certification dept. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?
"mark" wrote You also have FAR part 103 ultralights, and one other possibility for you depending on your condition. If it wasn't done during the intital attempt at getting a medical, and I doubt it was in that Light Sport is very new, you can ask that they review your medical certification again for Light Sport only. What on earth are you talking about? There is only one minimum level of medical that will do; at least a 3rd class medical, that he can let expire. There is no light sport medical review. -- Jim in NC |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?
"Morgans" wrote in message ... "mark" wrote You also have FAR part 103 ultralights, and one other possibility for you depending on your condition. If it wasn't done during the intital attempt at getting a medical, and I doubt it was in that Light Sport is very new, you can ask that they review your medical certification again for Light Sport only. What on earth are you talking about? There is only one minimum level of medical that will do; at least a 3rd class medical, that he can let expire. There is no light sport medical review. -- Jim in NC He can not just let his medical expire. If I understood correctly he attempted to get a 3rd class and was denied. That means the self certify does not apply to him, but the FAA will review the file again if it has not already done so, for allowing him to fly Light Sport Aircraft only. Once they review the file they could possibly issue a letter giving him the ok to self certify for LSA or under what conditions he would have to meet to fly LSA. Its also possible that they could turn him down again for LSA. That would limit him to 103 and possibly gliders. Its really one of the big catch 22's in LSA. If you attempt to get a medical and find a problem or if you try to jump through the hoops and someone say no, you lose the light sport as an option without more hoops. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?
"mark" wrote He can not just let his medical expire. If I understood correctly he attempted to get a 3rd class and was denied. Correct That means the self certify does not apply to him, but the FAA will review the file again if it has not already done so, for allowing him to fly Light Sport Aircraft only. Where have you ever heard of reviewing an application for allowing sport pilot only? You are proposing a procedure that is not in place. Once they review the file they could possibly issue a letter giving him the ok to self certify for LSA or under what conditions he would have to meet to fly LSA. Its also possible that they could turn him down again for LSA. They have already turned him down for LSA by turning down his medical. His medical MUST be reinstated fully, to fly, then he can let it expire and fly LSA. If you know of a procedure other than full medical reinstatement like you have posted, explain fully, and post cites. Until then, don't get some people's hopes up. -- Jim in NC |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?
"Morgans" wrote in message ... "mark" wrote He can not just let his medical expire. If I understood correctly he attempted to get a 3rd class and was denied. Correct That means the self certify does not apply to him, but the FAA will review the file again if it has not already done so, for allowing him to fly Light Sport Aircraft only. Where have you ever heard of reviewing an application for allowing sport pilot only? You are proposing a procedure that is not in place. Once they review the file they could possibly issue a letter giving him the ok to self certify for LSA or under what conditions he would have to meet to fly LSA. Its also possible that they could turn him down again for LSA. They have already turned him down for LSA by turning down his medical. His medical MUST be reinstated fully, to fly, then he can let it expire and fly LSA. If you know of a procedure other than full medical reinstatement like you have posted, explain fully, and post cites. Until then, don't get some people's hopes up. -- Jim in NC It is not the full medical. I wouldn't be getting peoples hopes up if I wasn't positive. The full review with the appeals likely was for the 3rd class. Third class has no restrictions on size, speed or type of airplane. Its perfectly legal with the right paperwork and pilot certificates to fly ANY certified airplane with a class 3. High perfomance twins, turbocharged and pressurized airplanes complex and high speed airplanes are all fair game with a class 3 and medically that affects both the operating environment and the risks involved with flight with various conditions. The review for light sport only puts very definate speed and weight restrictions on the pilots. Those restrictions most certainly lower the risks of flight involved to others. The procedure is in place, but must be requested if it was not done so with the request of the class 3. A class 3 request does not automatically call for a review for light sport qualifications. Once requested, the FAA can review the file and then make a determination as to his or her safety based on the lower performance of the aircraft and the lower demands on the pilot for the slower airplanes. That can be as simple as a letter to the applicant stating that his or her file has been reviewed and that they are now approved to self certify. It may also require other conditions like a phyisical from an AME every so often, and maybe specfic procedures to be done at that interval just as they can do now with a 3rd or any other class of medical certificate that might have an issue which would be a potential problem. It also can be a denial. They have great latitude. AOPA medical certification department 1 800 872 2672 (join if not a member its worth it) and AME's have the proper information available on how to make such a request and how such a request might be looked upon. Yes this is an option that can be explored and has been since the implementation of LSA. Hopefully in time this review will be automatic with the denial of a 3rd or any other class. Like many things though how you ask matters and its so new many AME's are just learning the ropes too. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?
"mark" wrote in message
news:SvWtg.816$WF6.188@trndny06... snip The review for light sport only puts very definate speed and weight restrictions on the pilots. snip Mark............. This sounds wonderful, however you still fail to give any reference in the FAR's for such a procedure. I have read them carefully from day one and do not remember any such clause. Would you please give chapter and verse. This information would be eagerly received by many. Rich S. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?
"mark" wrote It is not the full medical. I wouldn't be getting peoples hopes up if I wasn't positive. The review for light sport only puts very definate speed and weight restrictions on the pilots. Those restrictions most certainly lower the risks of flight involved to others. The procedure is in place, but must be requested if it was not done so with the request of the class 3. A class 3 request does not automatically call for a review for light sport qualifications. Once requested, the FAA can review the file and then make a determination as to his or her safety based on the lower performance of the aircraft and the lower demands on the pilot for the slower airplanes. How did you find out about this procedure? Do you know anyone who has been successful with the review? If this is a viable procedure, there must be a written record, as to how it is done, what it's limitations and requirements are, ect. The FAA does not do anything that is not on paper. Can you point to a reg., circular, or something on paper? Anyone else out there ever hear of this? I, for one, am still skeptical, but would *love* to be proven wrong, by seeing it in print, in a government record. Thanks for keeping this as a civil discussion. -- Jim in NC |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?
Its there but I have to dig it out. If you are interested in doing the
research for yourself it probably won't be in 67 yet. Look in LSA pamplets. AOPA has chapter and verse as to where its found. Anyone in that situation should be joining for their advise in these types of matters. Knowing how to fill out the paperwork is 3/4 ths of the battle. They know far better than any of us unless maybe there is an AME here that can quote straight from their manual. FWIW I researched it for my own purposes a while back. "Rich S." wrote in message . .. "mark" wrote in message news:SvWtg.816$WF6.188@trndny06... snip The review for light sport only puts very definate speed and weight restrictions on the pilots. snip Mark............. This sounds wonderful, however you still fail to give any reference in the FAR's for such a procedure. I have read them carefully from day one and do not remember any such clause. Would you please give chapter and verse. This information would be eagerly received by many. Rich S. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?
"Morgans" wrote in message ... "mark" wrote It is not the full medical. I wouldn't be getting peoples hopes up if I wasn't positive. The review for light sport only puts very definate speed and weight restrictions on the pilots. Those restrictions most certainly lower the risks of flight involved to others. The procedure is in place, but must be requested if it was not done so with the request of the class 3. A class 3 request does not automatically call for a review for light sport qualifications. Once requested, the FAA can review the file and then make a determination as to his or her safety based on the lower performance of the aircraft and the lower demands on the pilot for the slower airplanes. How did you find out about this procedure? Do you know anyone who has been successful with the review? If this is a viable procedure, there must be a written record, as to how it is done, what it's limitations and requirements are, ect. The FAA does not do anything that is not on paper. Can you point to a reg., circular, or something on paper? Anyone else out there ever hear of this? I, for one, am still skeptical, but would *love* to be proven wrong, by seeing it in print, in a government record. Thanks for keeping this as a civil discussion. -- Jim in NC Jim one of the issues with this type of procedure is that its a case by case basis. I did the research a while back because of my own health issues. They are still new so as I said they are not in 67 yet. They should be LSA information or the Aviation Medical Examiners manual. It will be several days for me to dig it out. It really isn't anything more than they do on any other medical. It is effectively a special issuance for the ability to fly LSA. I gave the AOPA number in a previous post. Don't take my word for it. Call them yourself. It is very possible that this request might have been done for the orginal poster with the inital application. Its also possible it wasn't. Only he would know and its none of our business the nature of the medical issue. Anyone that wants to fly that bad and is willing to press his medical that far, is someone I hope can be safe, approved and legal. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Grounded - Where to get rid of the Building Materials?
Morgans wrote: "Rocketeer" wrote Why yes, sailplanes! And there is a sailplane port not far from here. And NO MEDICAL REQUIRED!! Not for student or pilot. Thanks for making me look that up! But if they sent me the certified letter, is that for ONLY powered planes? I will have to have them answer that one for me cause the letter sounded awful hard against any flying. The single msot important consideration is to what extend you would be at greater risk than a pilot with a current medical. There is a gotcha in the sport pilot rating, in that there is no medical required IF you have not been turned down at your last FAA medical. That is your condition, so no sport pilot for you. Keeping the above consideration in mind, you might look into this strategy, described by "Jim" on the yahoo Texas Parasol group: Last year the FAA presented details of the medical rules at the Illinois Safety Seminar in Springfield. Here is a key item. If your last medical was not cancelled, you can then use your drivers license. And is here the way around your last cancellation per the FAA. Request a single flight medical for a ferry flight of a short distance. Almost always granted. Now your last medical is not a failure. You dont need to actually make the flight, just have permission. Your request of course would be for a single flight, VFR, no passengers, etc so there is no danger to anyone. I have no first hand experience at this, but am quoting an FAA employee from Oklahoma who addressed the crowd of 500 with this method. Please keep in mind those are Jim's words above, not mine. But again, the single most important consideration is if and to what extent your medical condition puts you (and the public) at increased risk should you fly. -- FF |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11 | Wake UP! | Piloting | 184 | April 7th 06 04:05 AM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONSon 9/11 | Frank F. Matthews | Piloting | 26 | March 1st 06 12:13 AM |
FA: Book - Aircraft Materials and Processes by Titterton Pub 1937 | Brad | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 21st 05 01:59 AM |
Defining Composites (long) | B Lacovara | Soaring | 1 | September 13th 03 08:04 PM |