If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
County Sheriff Arrests Pilot After Botched Landing
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:38:19 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law. Really Larry, you didn't know? How would I know? It's not in the FARs that I'm aware of. Are you able to cite the specific federal law that indicates airmen have implied consent to law enforcement taking bodily specimens? That's not what I asked. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
County Sheriff Arrests Pilot After Botched Landing
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
County Sheriff Arrests Pilot After Botched Landing
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote: On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:38:19 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law. Really Larry, you didn't know? How would I know? It's not in the FARs that I'm aware of. Are you able to cite the specific federal law that indicates airmen have implied consent to law enforcement taking bodily specimens? That's not what I asked. Gig, you deliberately edited Larry's original sentence from: "I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law," to: "I had no idea airmen operate under a federal law." then had the nerve to falsely attribute the latter sentence to him. Larry actually had to edit your reply to return the sentence to its original statement. What's up with that sort of nonsense? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
County Sheriff Arrests Pilot After Botched Landing
On Fri, 16 May 2008 12:40:08 -0500, Jim Logajan
wrote in : Gig, you deliberately edited Larry's original sentence from: "I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law," to: "I had no idea airmen operate under a federal law." then had the nerve to falsely attribute the latter sentence to him. Larry actually had to edit your reply to return the sentence to its original statement. What's up with that sort of nonsense? Revealing isn't it? Disappointing too. Not to mention immature, sophomoric, duplicitous, devious, disingenuous, shifty, sneaky, underhanded, deceptive, deceitful, sly, dishonest ... And here I thought no one was paying attention. You've got a sharp eye, Jim. I think some folks use Usenet as a tavern. They just don't realize how transparent they are when inebriated. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
County Sheriff Arrests Pilot After Botched Landing
Jim Logajan wrote:
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote: Larry Dighera wrote: On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:38:19 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law. Really Larry, you didn't know? How would I know? It's not in the FARs that I'm aware of. Are you able to cite the specific federal law that indicates airmen have implied consent to law enforcement taking bodily specimens? That's not what I asked. Gig, you deliberately edited Larry's original sentence from: "I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law," to: "I had no idea airmen operate under a federal law." then had the nerve to falsely attribute the latter sentence to him. Larry actually had to edit your reply to return the sentence to its original statement. What's up with that sort of nonsense? That is exactly what I did because he did the same thing to one of my posts earlier this week. You caught it, he didn't. Good work. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
County Sheriff Arrests Pilot After Botched Landing
Gig 601Xl Builder wrote:
Jim Logajan wrote: Gig 601Xl Builder wrote: Larry Dighera wrote: On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:38:19 -0500, Gig 601Xl Builder wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law. Really Larry, you didn't know? How would I know? It's not in the FARs that I'm aware of. Are you able to cite the specific federal law that indicates airmen have implied consent to law enforcement taking bodily specimens? That's not what I asked. Gig, you deliberately edited Larry's original sentence from: "I had no idea airmen operate under a federal implied consent law," to: "I had no idea airmen operate under a federal law." then had the nerve to falsely attribute the latter sentence to him. Larry actually had to edit your reply to return the sentence to its original statement. What's up with that sort of nonsense? That is exactly what I did because he did the same thing to one of my posts earlier this week. You caught it, he didn't. Good work. I'm afraid I missed that transgression because I haven't read all your posts or his. Do you happen to have the message ID or Google Groups link of his post? Still, I know you know the old saw about two wrongs not making a right (but that three rights make a left). Perhaps if you are more explicit in what you are doing and why then you wont have slow witted readers like myself assuming you are the original perp and not a victim seeking payback. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
County Sheriff Arrests Pilot After Botched Landing
Jim Logajan wrote:
Still, I know you know the old saw about two wrongs not making a right (but that three rights make a left). Perhaps if you are more explicit in what you are doing and why then you wont have slow witted readers like myself assuming you are the original perp and not a victim seeking payback. It was in the thread about the guy who got stuck in the JetBlue bathroom. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cook county | Big John[_2_] | Piloting | 5 | March 13th 08 05:36 AM |
Another Botched use of runways | Skunk | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | November 7th 06 02:37 AM |
Bad landing; lucky pilot | Dave in San Diego | Naval Aviation | 9 | March 26th 05 06:10 PM |
Study pilot workload during approach and landing | Freshfighter | Piloting | 5 | December 7th 03 04:06 PM |
British pilot (in Britain), survives forced mountain landing | Tim K | Piloting | 3 | July 11th 03 04:14 PM |